This is a coincidence! I'm currently re-reading the omnibus 'The World of Jeeves', and I also started watching the DVDs of Stephen Fry's and Hugh Laurie's 'Jeeves & Wooster'. And now this. I know...
This is a coincidence! I'm currently re-reading the omnibus 'The World of Jeeves', and I also started watching the DVDs of Stephen Fry's and Hugh Laurie's 'Jeeves & Wooster'. And now this. I know what I'm doing this weekend! :)
Damn, reading this I am now super disappointed that I missed the Phantom airing. I have seen it way too many times to count over the years, but I would have loved to see the more recent Australian...
Damn, reading this I am now super disappointed that I missed the Phantom airing. I have seen it way too many times to count over the years, but I would have loved to see the more recent Australian cast/production. :(
Ah well, at least I can mark my calendar now so I don't miss By Jeeves. It's one I haven't ever seen, so I am kinda excited about finally being able to. Thanks for sharing this, @Algernon_Asimov!
p.s. I edited the title to add the date/time of the release for people.
I'd never seen 'Phantom' before, so I was looking forward to it. I didn't like it. I stopped about a third of the way through. I thought the 'Phantom' video was from an English production. It was...
I am now super disappointed that I missed the Phantom airing.
I'd never seen 'Phantom' before, so I was looking forward to it. I didn't like it. I stopped about a third of the way through.
I would have loved to see the more recent Australian cast/production. :(
I thought the 'Phantom' video was from an English production. It was the sequel, 'Love Never Dies', which was an Australian production.
p.s. I edited the title to add the date/time of the release for people.
So that people don't have to read the article for themselves?
Ah, looks like they aired the 25th Anniversary edition, which I have already seen, and actually own a copy of. That's makes me feel a bit better since I didn't really miss anything new. The...
The broadcast will be the version of the show recorded for its 25th anniversary at the Royal Albert Hall in 2011, starring Ramin Karimloo as the Phantom and Sierra Boggess as Christine. -Source
Ah, looks like they aired the 25th Anniversary edition, which I have already seen, and actually own a copy of. That's makes me feel a bit better since I didn't really miss anything new.
So that people don't have to read the article for themselves?
The condescension is really not appreciated, or warranted IMO. The headline as it was made it seem like it might be available to watch right now, which it's not. Adding the date/time clears that up, and can also help remind people later of when it actually is airing in case they want to watch it.
The headline is just to show people a musical is streaming. If people are interested in that musical, they can read the article to find out where and when it's streaming. If they're not...
The headline is just to show people a musical is streaming. If people are interested in that musical, they can read the article to find out where and when it's streaming. If they're not interested, they don't care where and when it's streaming.
It's just a few extra words and yet could potentially clear up any confusion and save people some effort later. Why must you question absolutely everything people do on this site? I'm just trying...
It's just a few extra words and yet could potentially clear up any confusion and save people some effort later. Why must you question absolutely everything people do on this site? I'm just trying to help people, as I myself was a bit confused (and disappointed) by the headline at first too.
Why not? Because those actions being "inefficient, illogical, and encouraging laziness" is just your opinion, not objective fact... and constantly questioning people's every action in such a...
Why not? Because those actions being "inefficient, illogical, and encouraging laziness" is just your opinion, not objective fact... and constantly questioning people's every action in such a condescending manner is annoying as hell, and can potentially drive people off the site as a result!
Some people, myself included, appreciate having more clarity in headlines, and being saved a bit of effort in the future in case we need to find certain information again later. But what I and many others don't appreciate is receiving incredibly snide remarks and looked down upon by you every time we do something you deem inappropriate, especially when we're often just trying to help people (yourself included in many cases)!
Because it's tiresome and rude, and you often put forward your own opinion as though it were a hard fact. I can certainly believe that it could cause people to be driven off the site - I think...
Because it's tiresome and rude, and you often put forward your own opinion as though it were a hard fact. I can certainly believe that it could cause people to be driven off the site - I think it's had that effect on me somewhat.
This is a coincidence! I'm currently re-reading the omnibus 'The World of Jeeves', and I also started watching the DVDs of Stephen Fry's and Hugh Laurie's 'Jeeves & Wooster'. And now this. I know what I'm doing this weekend! :)
Damn, reading this I am now super disappointed that I missed the Phantom airing. I have seen it way too many times to count over the years, but I would have loved to see the more recent Australian cast/production. :(
Ah well, at least I can mark my calendar now so I don't miss By Jeeves. It's one I haven't ever seen, so I am kinda excited about finally being able to. Thanks for sharing this, @Algernon_Asimov!
p.s. I edited the title to add the date/time of the release for people.
I'd never seen 'Phantom' before, so I was looking forward to it. I didn't like it. I stopped about a third of the way through.
I thought the 'Phantom' video was from an English production. It was the sequel, 'Love Never Dies', which was an Australian production.
So that people don't have to read the article for themselves?
Ah, looks like they aired the 25th Anniversary edition, which I have already seen, and actually own a copy of. That's makes me feel a bit better since I didn't really miss anything new.
The condescension is really not appreciated, or warranted IMO. The headline as it was made it seem like it might be available to watch right now, which it's not. Adding the date/time clears that up, and can also help remind people later of when it actually is airing in case they want to watch it.
The headline is just to show people a musical is streaming. If people are interested in that musical, they can read the article to find out where and when it's streaming. If they're not interested, they don't care where and when it's streaming.
It's just a few extra words and yet could potentially clear up any confusion and save people some effort later. Why must you question absolutely everything people do on this site? I'm just trying to help people, as I myself was a bit confused (and disappointed) by the headline at first too.
Because I see people doing stupid things, inefficient things, illogical things, and things to encourage laziness. Why would I not question that?
Why not? Because those actions being "inefficient, illogical, and encouraging laziness" is just your opinion, not objective fact... and constantly questioning people's every action in such a condescending manner is annoying as hell, and can potentially drive people off the site as a result!
Some people, myself included, appreciate having more clarity in headlines, and being saved a bit of effort in the future in case we need to find certain information again later. But what I and many others don't appreciate is receiving incredibly snide remarks and looked down upon by you every time we do something you deem inappropriate, especially when we're often just trying to help people (yourself included in many cases)!
Because it's tiresome and rude, and you often put forward your own opinion as though it were a hard fact. I can certainly believe that it could cause people to be driven off the site - I think it's had that effect on me somewhat.