-
8 votes
-
The race for next generation submarines - ageing fleets, innovation, and undersea dominance
16 votes -
The engineering of duct tape
19 votes -
How bridge engineers design against ship collisions
4 votes -
The most powerful fire truck ever created
2 votes -
US nuclear missile program set the launch code to "00000000" during the cold war
37 votes -
Weird Wings: The M-21, an A-12 (SR-71 Blackbird predecessor) modified to launch a drone for recon missions over China in the 60s
10 votes -
The blue LED was supposed to be impossible—until a young engineer proposed a moonshot idea
26 votes -
The world’s largest earthquake simulator, and how it works
6 votes -
A matter of millimeters: the story of Qantas flight 32
35 votes -
Sewing machines are mechanical marvels – here’s how they work
43 votes -
Welding and the automation frontier
6 votes -
How the gas turbine conquered the electric power industry
8 votes -
The ritual of the calling of an engineer
30 votes -
The insane engineering of the F-16
11 votes -
How Japan's maglev train works
13 votes -
"Motors and Generators" (1961)
11 votes -
Lens rotation (United States Lighthouse Society)
12 votes -
How a World War II submarine works
6 votes -
Camp Century - The Hidden City Beneath the Ice
9 votes -
A look back at some robotic inventions that didn't quite get there
12 votes -
Philadelphia I-95 bridge collapse explained
11 votes -
The inventor of glitter, Henry Ruschmann, also helped develop the atomic bomb
14 votes -
Why did nuclear flop in Britain?
14 votes -
Watching paint dry: The chemical engineering of car paint
16 votes -
The US's flirtation with nuclear powered jet aircraft
If everything had worked perfectly, it still would have been a bum airplane." - Charles Wilson, Secretary of Defense Back in the 1950s and 1960s, the United States attempted to design nuclear...
If everything had worked perfectly, it still would have been a bum airplane." - Charles Wilson, Secretary of Defense
Back in the 1950s and 1960s, the United States attempted to design nuclear powered aircraft. This was part of a larger "nuclear craze" in the era where everything and anything was proposed to have nuclear technology applied to it. This led to all kinds of things like the Chrysler TV-8 and "peaceful" earthmoving construction projects. The only place where nuclear power or propulsion really took off was for large ocean going ships both for military navies as well as civilian tankers, cargo ships and icebreakers. Spacecraft technology was the only other "success story."
Nuclear powered aircraft, while more realistic than say nuclear cars, never quite caught on except for a few experimental engines and just one actual working aircraft. The most extensive efforts towards this during the Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion (ANP) program were the HTRE-2 and HTRE-3 experimental nuclear reactors with heat transfer assemblies designed for nuclear powered aircraft at the Idaho National Laboratory. Rather than burning fuel, the jet turbine would use the heat from the nuclear reaction to heat air sent through a compressor which would then be expelled as exhaust for thrust.
On of the more fascinating tests were the test flights of the NB-36H which while conventionally powered, flew while carrying a working nuclear reactor to test the protective shielding of the crew. It carried an air-cooled 1 megawatt reactor. The engineers and crew worked within a specially shielded nose cabin with 12-inch-thick lead-glass windows.
The project was canceled by the Kennedy administration a few months after taking office in 1961 citing high costs, poor management, and little progress towards a flight ready reactor saying:
At the time of termination, the Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion Program was still in the research and development stage, with primary emphasis on high performance reactors. Although a number of research and development achievements can be credited to this program, at the time of termination an airplane had never been flown on nuclear power nor had a prototype airplane been built. - Joseph Campbell, Comptroller General
and
Nearly 15 years and about $1 billion have been devoted to the attempted development of a nuclear-powered aircraft; but the possibility of achieving a militarily useful aircraft in the foreseeable future is still very remote. - John F. Kennedy, POTUS
Footnote: This post is a rework of a reddit post I made here a couple years back. It's not really meant to be a coherent or lengthy article but has some links and thoughts which I found interesting.
20 votes -
Building a cathedral without science or mathematics: The engineering method explained
4 votes -
The origins of precision
6 votes -
Why river channels shift and meander, and what tools engineers use to manage the process (Part 1)
2 votes -
How do seatbelts work?
2 votes -
What really happened during the 2003 blackout?
7 votes -
How road barriers stopped killing drivers
6 votes -
Repairing underground, high voltage power lines is nearly impossible
6 votes -
Screws - The early years
8 votes -
Where Manhattan’s grid plan came from
5 votes