13 votes

Payments app Zelle begins refunds for imposter scams after Washington pressure

2 comments

  1. [2]
    skybrian
    Link
    From the article: … …

    From the article:

    The 2,100 financial firms on Zelle, a peer-to-peer network owned by seven banks including JPMorgan Chase (JPM.N) and Bank of America (BAC.N), began reversing transfers as of June 30 for customers duped into sending money to scammers claiming to be from a government agency, bank or existing service provider, said Early Warning Services (EWS), the banks' company that owns Zelle.

    The new policy marks a major shift from last year when bankers, including JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, told lawmakers worried about rising scams that it was unreasonable to require banks to refund transfers that customers were tricked into approving.

    Following its launch in 2017, Zelle grew to become one of the largest U.S. peer-to-peer payments networks by total payments. A March 2022 New York Times report that scams were flourishing on Zelle caught the attention of lawmakers frequently critical of big banks, including Senator Elizabeth Warren.

    Banks worry that covering the cost of authorized transactions will encourage more fraud and put them on the hook for potentially billions of dollars. Instead of requiring lenders to reimburse customers, EWS has implemented a mechanism that allows banks to claw back funds from the recipient's account and return them to the sender, said Chance.

    Lenders on Zelle are also now required to implement a tool that flags transfers with risky attributes, such as a payment to an account that has never transacted on the Zelle network, said Chance. He said Zelle has seen "a step-change reduction" in fraud and scam rates this year but declined to provide details.

    4 votes
    1. BitsMcBytes
      Link Parent
      Sort of reminds me of a similar case, but the other way around, where Citi accidentally sent out $900M and legally could not claw it back (though they were returned $400M)....

      JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, told lawmakers worried about rising scams that it was unreasonable to require banks to refund transfers that customers were tricked into approving

      Sort of reminds me of a similar case, but the other way around, where Citi accidentally sent out $900M and legally could not claw it back (though they were returned $400M).
      https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/16/business/citibank-revlon-lawsuit-ruling/index.html

      8 votes