Yeah I think they get into this in the talk, but this seems like the default view (well, that or theism.) It's rarer that an analytically rigorous case for cosmic purpose is given without theism...
Yeah I think they get into this in the talk, but this seems like the default view (well, that or theism.) It's rarer that an analytically rigorous case for cosmic purpose is given without theism in mind.
This talk is also available on YouTube
For an earlier, skeptical take, see: No Cosmic Meaning (David Chapman).
Yeah I think they get into this in the talk, but this seems like the default view (well, that or theism.) It's rarer that an analytically rigorous case for cosmic purpose is given without theism in mind.