9 votes

US Speaker Mike Johnson touts GOP wins on migrant detention in funding deal

4 comments

  1. skybrian
    (edited )
    Link
    This article is from Monday, but it has some background on ICE budget issues: Congress, White House agree on spending but may still miss deadline (Washington Post) Edit: this article from the same...

    This article is from Monday, but it has some background on ICE budget issues:

    Congress, White House agree on spending but may still miss deadline (Washington Post)

    The bipartisan bill that failed in the Senate last month included nearly $14 billion in supplemental funding for immigration and border security, including $6 billion for ICE detention and deportation operations. The funds would have allowed the agency to boost its detention capacity from 40,000 to 50,000 beds, according to administration officials.

    Instead, ICE officials are facing a $700 million budget shortfall, and the agency has started drafting emergency plans to cut costs by releasing thousands of detainees. With fewer available detention beds, ICE has warned that it will also have to cut back on the number of people who cross the border illegally that it can accept from U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

    That would increase the odds that migrants who enter the United States illegally will be released into the country, rather than detained and deported, regardless of whether they have strong asylum claims.

    White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters Monday that the department has deported or returned more migrants during the past 10 months than during any year since 2013: “They have maximized their operations.”

    But deportations have soared because record numbers of migrants are entering the United States. Authorities have tallied about 2 million illegal crossings along the Mexican border on average since Biden took office, the busiest stretch in history.

    Edit: this article from the same reporter has still more background:

    Biden toughened asylum screening. It won’t contain a new border surge (Washington Post)

    For much of the past decade, as soaring numbers of migrants crossed illegally and expressed fear, most were able to pass the initial screening, which sent their cases to U.S. immigration courts. A much smaller number of those who made a fear claim — about 20 percent — were ultimately granted U.S. asylum. Many migrants never complete the application process after they are released from custody to await a court hearing, court data shows.

    The gap between the relative ease of passing the initial screening and the tougher odds of getting U.S. asylum is considered by lawmakers from both parties to be an incentive for illegal border crossings. Migrants with weak or fake claims can avoid deportation and live and work in the United States while waiting for their asylum case to plod through clogged U.S. immigration courts — a process that takes five to seven years on average, according to the latest government estimates.

    And because DHS doesn’t have enough asylum officers to screen all the migrants expressing fear, border crossers who don’t get initial interviews are referred to the immigration court system and released into the United States. About half of illegal border crossings are families with children, who are generally not detained.

    ...

    DHS’s emphasis on asylum cases has diverted so much attention to the border that its other caseloads are growing worse. The backlog of “affirmative asylum” cases — from applicants who seek protection after entering the country legally — nearly doubled last year to more than 1.1 million cases.

    7 votes
  2. [3]
    LukeZaz
    Link
    Archive link: https://archive.is/KbgU7 Please note that I'm posting this article for reasons unrelated to the title itself – namely the specific content of the bill – and would choose a completely...

    Archive link: https://archive.is/KbgU7

    Please note that I'm posting this article for reasons unrelated to the title itself – namely the specific content of the bill – and would choose a completely different one were it not for consensus here of keeping the original. As I see it, the title Bloomberg used is terrible and says nothing of import where it could have said a lot. The snippets I found worth reading have been included below. If anyone with title editing privileges agrees that the title should change and has an idea for a better one, feel free to edit.

    Johnson also touted as a conservative win a provision he said the deal includes banning the LGBTQ Pride flag from being flown over US embassies, according to the person familiar. Some US embassies have displayed the rainbow-colored Pride flag to mark LGBTQ Pride Month or other occasions.

    [...]

    Democrats are claiming as victories including 12,000 new visas for Afghans who helped the US during the Afghanistan War as well as increases to Title I education funding, Head Start, cancer research and Alzheimer’s research, said a person familiar with those conversations. Democrats also secured a one year extension of international HIV/AIDS prevention efforts.

    [...]

    In the Republican meeting, Johnson told GOP lawmakers last-minute negotiations on Homeland Security funding led to an increase in immigrant detention beds from 34,000 to 42,000 and a 20% cut to non-governmental organizations dealing with migration. A total of 22,000 border agents would be funded by the bill.

    President Joe Biden had sought both a detention bed increase and more funding for border agents.

    The speaker also touted a pay increase for US troops, cuts to diversity programs and to the Pentagon’s climate change program as victories along with a 6% cut to foreign aid.

    He also chalked up as a win a prohibition on US funding for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNWRA), some of whose workers are accused of participating in Hamas attacks against Israel.

    (emphasis mine)

    This bill1 has, as of today, been passed.


    1. Note that this file is from before the bill was passed. I only found it from this Forbes article, as the links I find on official sites only lead to a 404.

    5 votes
    1. updawg
      Link Parent
      Pretty crazy that Democrats have to secure funding for W's biggest success as President. Good to see that the Republicans are celebrating cutting the budget for things the Pentagon has identified...

      Democrats also secured a one year extension of international HIV/AIDS prevention efforts.

      Pretty crazy that Democrats have to secure funding for W's biggest success as President.

      The speaker also touted a pay increase for US troops, cuts to diversity programs and to the Pentagon’s climate change program

      Good to see that the Republicans are celebrating cutting the budget for things the Pentagon has identified as critical national security threats and force multipliers. Really shows how much they care. And that second sentence doesn't even have to be read sarcastically!

      Anyway, everybody who supports the Republicans has shown where their priorities lie and it's so hypocritical when they act like they're trying to be the good guys making friends across the aisle while promoting hate. Blindly supporting the Democrats is problematic, too, but at least they aren't comic book villains at this point.

      It's really hard to get me to lose hope, but the more I talk to "ReLuCtAnT" Trump supporters...

      14 votes
    2. [2]
      Comment deleted by author
      Link Parent
      1. LukeZaz
        Link Parent
        Fair, but I'd still rather someone else come up with one. Given my feelings on the topic, I am unsure I could write one that would be sufficiently unbiased.

        Fair, but I'd still rather someone else come up with one. Given my feelings on the topic, I am unsure I could write one that would be sufficiently unbiased.

        4 votes