31
votes
Young, progressive, DSA-backed Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ousted ten-term incumbent in NY primary
Link information
This data is scraped automatically and may be incorrect.
- Title
- Democrats see major upset as socialist beats top-ranking US congressman
- Authors
- Ben Jacobs, Lauren Gambino
- Published
- Jun 27 2018
- Word count
- 967 words
This is fantastic news for the young progressives out there! We still have a chance. Let's get rid of the baby boomers and take our country back from the right wing authoritarians!
The majority of her campaign funds were donations under $200, and she spent nearly nothing on TV ads. You can check out her platform, here.
I think she's awesome. Spits fire and has a positive vision for the future. She has the same kind of energy in her that I saw in a lot of my peers during the 2016 Presidential Primary.
There is also a breakdown of some other primaries that happened yesterday.
I definitely don't like the idea of socialism growing in influence, but holy crap do I approve of removing someone whose been there 20 years. We need term limits, badly.
The DSA really isn't that radical of an organization, I mean it's in the name (democratic socialist).
Socialism is the only way we can face all of the coming challenges: ecological catastrophe leading to unforeseen immigration, massive unemployment due to automation, right-wing authoritarianism, etc.
What is your idea of socialism?
I'm mixed on term limits.
On one hand it would be good to remove a lot of these calcified incumbents who never run in a real competitive election. On the other hand it removes a lot of expertise from government, and if voters in a district want to keep electing the same person, why shouldn't they? Plus what is the incentive to actually govern well, when you're going to be out of your seat no matter what? That seems like it would create an incentive to buddy up to lobbyist firms and special interests, which I think is why there's a push for it from the right.
I think a better solution might be to end political gerrymandering. Let an independent body draw districts so that incumbents can't create safe seats for themselves every ten years.
This is one blip in a much larger trend of incumbents getting re-elected. In 2016, the incumbency advantage was 3.2% (that is, being an incumbent got you 3.2% more of the vote than not being an incumbent). That was up from 2014's advantage of 2.55%.
Celebrating one of the few defeats for incumbents, while more than 98% of incumbents in the house are getting re-elected, is a lot like saying "Yes! Pablo was never separated from his family" while talking about immigration policy at the US-Mexico border. Sure, celebrate the one, but really guys.