19 votes

The Banality of Brett Kavanaugh

7 comments

  1. psi
    (edited )
    Link
    The guys like Brett Kavanaugh who run the show have no special qualities or insights that should oblige us to put up with their bullshit. They would hate for us to realize that. Edit: Also there's...

    The guys like Brett Kavanaugh who run the show have no special qualities or insights that should oblige us to put up with their bullshit. They would hate for us to realize that.

    What struck me most about yesterday’s hearing, cutting through Kavanaugh’s tone-deaf retorts and indignant whinging and his frequent professions of love for beer, is how utterly ordinary he is. This guy is juvenile, arrogant, sexist — and very familiar. It pointed to a larger truth: the people running the show are callous and dangerous, but they’re also astonishingly average. They have no irreplaceable qualities or insights that would oblige us to put up with their bullshit. They would hate for us to realize this.

    What dawns upon you when you bear witness to Trump — even more so than with Bush, who more closely resembles Kavanaugh in both his fatuous smugness and his more conventional unobstructed path to political power — is that the people at the helm don’t necessarily know anything special. It cannot be deduced from the mere fact of their power that they have access to a higher wisdom, beyond the grasp of commoners. The powerful aren’t sages, you realize. What they know that the rest don’t know is how to appreciate money and influence. And, most importantly, they know each other

    One got the impression from Kavanaugh’s hearing that it’s his boyhood friend Tobin, he of the home weight room, whose admiration Kavanaugh covets most of all — then, now, and forever. Many people are like this. It can sometimes be a good thing. But here’s where it differs from other types of loyalty: the reason these guys cling so tight is because they’re each other’s ticket to the top, and each other’s insurance policy once they get there. Their fidelity, their solidarity, is how they run the world in the absence of remarkable personal qualities.

    [A]s long as we have a political economic system that floats chumps like Kavanaugh on wings of respectable pedigree and impressive social connections to the highest strata of society, and as long as we continue fostering in people’s hearts — even of liberals, especially liberals — the fantasy of those people’s inherent superiority, these guys will continue to have power they don’t deserve. They will continue to be in charge of monumental decisions like Roe v. Wade or Janus v. AFSCME, or going to war or eliminating social programs, or who’s guilty and who’s innocent.

    Edit: Also there's a similar opinion piece in the NY Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/01/opinion/kavanaugh-white-male-privilege.html

    7 votes
  2. [6]
    cfabbro
    (edited )
    Link
    Thoughts on moving this to ~misc rather than ~news? This is seemingly a pure opinion piece with no real substantive news about Kavanaugh, the hearing or investigation. p.s. Feel free to label this...

    Thoughts on moving this to ~misc rather than ~news? This is seemingly a pure opinion piece with no real substantive news about Kavanaugh, the hearing or investigation.

    p.s. Feel free to label this comment off-topic since it's a meta-discussion.

    6 votes
    1. [3]
      spit-evil-olive-tips
      Link Parent
      I think ~news is appropriate - the group description says it includes analysis/opinion pieces. The way I look at it is that we have two "catch-all" groups for when a topic doesn't fit anywhere...

      I think ~news is appropriate - the group description says it includes analysis/opinion pieces.

      The way I look at it is that we have two "catch-all" groups for when a topic doesn't fit anywhere else. ~news is for "current" stuff, ~misc is for "timeless" stuff. If it'd be as interesting/relevant a year from now as it is today, ~misc it is. If a year (or even a month) from now it'll be "yeah, that's pretty outdated" then it should be ~news.

      7 votes
      1. [2]
        cfabbro
        (edited )
        Link Parent
        Fair enough. Although I think at some point a ~news.opinions would be nice to separate this sort of content from more fact based news. And at the very least for now I think an opinion tag should...

        Fair enough. Although I think at some point a ~news.opinions would be nice to separate this sort of content from more fact based news. And at the very least for now I think an opinion tag should be applied to these sort of topics so people can filter them out, should they desire... so I have added that tag to this topic.

        4 votes
        1. spit-evil-olive-tips
          Link Parent
          Yep, I think an opinion tag is the way to go, and when the subgroup-pocalypse happens ~news.opinion will probably be one of the first to be created.

          Yep, I think an opinion tag is the way to go, and when the subgroup-pocalypse happens ~news.opinion will probably be one of the first to be created.

          3 votes
    2. [2]
      psi
      Link Parent
      That would be fine with me. I'm not entirely sure what the appropriate group is for an opinion piece on current affairs.

      That would be fine with me. I'm not entirely sure what the appropriate group is for an opinion piece on current affairs.

      3 votes
      1. cfabbro
        Link Parent
        Heh, no worries. None of us are really sure about this sort of stuff yet. That's why I asked, to see what everyone thought about it first. ;)

        Heh, no worries. None of us are really sure about this sort of stuff yet. That's why I asked, to see what everyone thought about it first. ;)

        2 votes