18 votes

Clarence Thomas and the US billionaire

3 comments

  1. [3]
    AugustusFerdinand
    Link

    IN LATE JUNE 2019, right after the U.S. Supreme Court released its final opinion of the term, Justice Clarence Thomas boarded a large private jet headed to Indonesia. He and his wife were going on vacation: nine days of island-hopping in a volcanic archipelago on a superyacht staffed by a coterie of attendants and a private chef.

    If Thomas had chartered the plane and the 162-foot yacht himself, the total cost of the trip could have exceeded $500,000. Fortunately for him, that wasn’t necessary: He was on vacation with real estate magnate and Republican megadonor Harlan Crow, who owned the jet — and the yacht, too.

    For more than two decades, Thomas has accepted luxury trips virtually every year from the Dallas businessman without disclosing them, documents and interviews show. A public servant who has a salary of $285,000, he has vacationed on Crow’s superyacht around the globe. He flies on Crow’s Bombardier Global 5000 jet. He has gone with Crow to the Bohemian Grove, the exclusive California all-male retreat, and to Crow’s sprawling ranch in East Texas. And Thomas typically spends about a week every summer at Crow’s private resort in the Adirondacks.

    The extent and frequency of Crow’s apparent gifts to Thomas have no known precedent in the modern history of the U.S. Supreme Court.

    These trips appeared nowhere on Thomas’ financial disclosures. His failure to report the flights appears to violate a law passed after Watergate that requires justices, judges, members of Congress and federal officials to disclose most gifts, two ethics law experts said. He also should have disclosed his trips on the yacht, these experts said.

    Thomas did not respond to a detailed list of questions.

    9 votes
    1. rosco
      Link Parent
      The answer is simple. As a constitutionalist he doesn't need to report those kinds of gifts because jets and yachts didn't exist in 1776 so they are outside the purview of those laws. /s

      The answer is simple. As a constitutionalist he doesn't need to report those kinds of gifts because jets and yachts didn't exist in 1776 so they are outside the purview of those laws. /s

      15 votes
    2. Nivlak
      Link Parent
      And nothing of consequence will happen to him… rules for thee, not for me.

      And nothing of consequence will happen to him… rules for thee, not for me.

      5 votes