So far SCOTUS has been adept to do nothing with a lot of words. The incredible part is that if the President was of another party (and dare I say color) decisions would be expeditious. Law may be...
So far SCOTUS has been adept to do nothing with a lot of words. The incredible part is that if the President was of another party (and dare I say color) decisions would be expeditious. Law may be blind, but men aren't and so far these people have clearly shown themselves to everyone. Don't believe a thing an article purports to represent of SCOTUS.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday seemed skeptical of President Donald Trump’s authority to impose sweeping tariffs in a series of executive orders earlier this year. During more than two-and-a-half hours of oral arguments, a majority of the justices appeared to agree with the small businesses and states challenging the tariffs that they exceeded the powers given to the president under a federal law providing him the authority to regulate commerce during national emergencies created by foreign threats.
Wouldn’t it be nice if they included cases like this on the shadow docket then instead of letting him wreak havoc on the global economy for a year?
So far SCOTUS has been adept to do nothing with a lot of words. The incredible part is that if the President was of another party (and dare I say color) decisions would be expeditious. Law may be blind, but men aren't and so far these people have clearly shown themselves to everyone. Don't believe a thing an article purports to represent of SCOTUS.
From the blog: