-
58 votes
-
A legal historian who studies the US abortion battle explains why the Alabama state Supreme Court’s decision on in vitro fertilization is so momentous
35 votes -
Texas is right. The tech giants need to be regulated.
10 votes -
Conservative government would require websites to verify age to watch porn: Pierre Poilievre
36 votes -
Germany's new cannabis law to pass this week and take effect in April
17 votes -
The CHIPS Act treats the symptoms, but not the causes
23 votes -
Megathread - Update on state court cases challenging legality of Donald Trump candidacy under the 14th amendment section 3 of the US constitution
45 votes -
Secretive US right wing advocacy group promotes model legislation to limit public nuisance claims like those responsible for tobacco and opioid verdicts
18 votes -
US FDA recommends easing restrictions on marijuana
62 votes -
US President Joe Biden pardons thousands on federal marijuana charges, commutes others
79 votes -
Iran has accused Swedish EU employee Johan Floderus of spying for Israel and "corruption on earth", a crime that carries the death penalty under Tehran's Islamic laws
9 votes -
Oklahoma and Federal authorities crack down on Glock "switches"
11 votes -
Leonard Leo: The man behind the Republican US Supreme Court majority
24 votes -
New developments in US antitrust enforcement - more and new types of cases brought under Joe Biden, new leaders at the Federal Trade Commission
14 votes -
‘Once we win California, the nation is next’: What a caste discrimination ban means for Americans
19 votes -
Why the US left's version of the Federalist Society failed
16 votes -
Opinion: Why a Navajo leader’s federal conviction gives US prosecutors a road map to take on former president Donald Trump
15 votes -
US Supreme Court accepts case challenging Donald Trump's eligibility to run for president based on the 14th amendment and the January 6 capitol riot
60 votes -
A proposed law to ban caste discrimination in California has touched a nerve, led to controversy
41 votes -
Interactive tool infographic shows antiprotest bills and laws in the United States
11 votes -
Opinion - Antonin Scalia was wrong about the meaning of ‘bear arms’
33 votes -
Analysis: Defendant Mark Meadows testifies in hearing on whether to remove Georgia election trial to federal court
7 votes -
US federal judge to hear arguments on Mark Meadows’ request to move Georgia election case from state court to federal court
12 votes -
Two prominent conservative law professors write article arguing Donald Trump ineligible to run for US President under 14th amendment
72 votes -
Laurence Tribe dissects alleged Donald Trump co-conspirator Kenneth Chesebro's misrepresentation of Laurence Tribe's writing to support the false US elector scheme and January 6
10 votes -
US President Joe Biden's IRA shuts Africa out of critical minerals supply chains
6 votes -
"Blood on your hands" - The legal dimension of metaphors in the case of Zooey Zephyr
7 votes -
US President Joe Biden signs historic order moving prosecution of US military sexual assault outside chain of command
133 votes -
Israel’s top court will hear challenges to a new law that weakens its power, the law has sparked large protests
10 votes -
The invasion of Iraq was a turning point on to a path that led towards Ukraine
9 votes -
Sanna Marin's human rights legislation for indigenous Sámi fails – Sámi Parliament Act failed to get past the final committee stage in Finnish parliament
3 votes -
Why most gun laws aren’t backed up by evidence
7 votes -
New Jersey requiring students to learn 'media literacy' to fight 'disinformation'
15 votes -
Congress passes law banning non-disclosure agreements in sexual harassment cases
14 votes -
Sanna Marin's Finnish government could collapse, as human rights laws stalled – new Sámi Parliament Act is the right of self-determination
6 votes -
Regardless of the outcome of the November 1 polls, Denmark is expected to maintain its restrictive immigration policies
2 votes -
How to make class action lawsuits more meaningful to the public
Have you ever received notice that you might be eligible for something from a class-action settlement? Ever notice that the effort required to recover is significant, and the recovery perhaps...
Have you ever received notice that you might be eligible for something from a class-action settlement? Ever notice that the effort required to recover is significant, and the recovery perhaps insultingly miniscule?
I don't know of any data, but I suspect that's true of nearly every class action lawsuit, even those that win in court battles. Maybe the original plaintiffs get a decent recovery, sometimes there's injunctive relief (which means the court forces the defendant to do or not do something). Every once in a while, individual members of the class get a meaningful outcome (vw's dieselgate comes to mind).
The public interest justification for the outcomes where the recover for class members is really small, if one is even ever really offered, is that the cost of the action to the defendant serves as an inducement to all defendants to keep their act together. But see, Tyler Durden's explanation of the actuarial function from Fight Club.
My thought is that instead of any recovery for the individual class members ("fuck 'em, right?"), their portion of the money should go to a public interest fund dedicated to consumer protection. My reason for this is that these small recoveries don't make any useful change for the individual class member consumers. But collectively, might add up to enough to make a meaningful difference to the future activities of producers.
Of course, all the usual caveats about corruption and accountability come into play. But there's a few reasons it might help, if those can be overcome. First, it might prompt faster, lest costly settlements. The payouts would be lower, and also the transaction costs. This shifts the litigation process from focussing on big recoveries to high volume of suits, bringing in more defendants. It would also enable smaller firms to bring suit, the hope being that smaller firms would take on more marginal cases and get more action.
Second, it might actually create a feedback loop. If the fund gets large enough, it could lobby and investigate, providing more information more new suits, and identifying the worst actors, and encouraging useful regulation. Imagine if Consumers Union could return to its glory of the 80's and have a big lobbying fund?
Or, we could just have decent government level consumer protections (hahhahahahahahahah!)
9 votes -
Recordings within eight feet of police illegal in Arizona under bill signed into law by Ducey
20 votes -
The conservative Supreme Court's favorite judicial philosophy requires a very, very firm grasp of history — one that none of the justices seem to possess
16 votes -
Texas is quietly using redistricting lawsuits to launch a broader war against federal voting rights law
5 votes -
Belgium to decriminalise sex work
19 votes -
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau invokes Emergencies Act to address trucker protests
22 votes -
Decrying “bounties” in Texas’ S.B. 8 is a political trap
2 votes -
Taiwan supports Lithuania as China applies sanctions
10 votes -
Jailed for fifty-one weeks for protesting? Britain is becoming a police state by stealth
18 votes -
Millions in UK face disenfranchisement under voter ID plans
7 votes -
The Supreme Court’s newest Justices produce some unexpected results
15 votes -
Denmark is set to adopt legislation enabling it to open asylum centres outside Europe where applicants would be sent to live
6 votes -
Europeans get ‘right to repair’ for some electrical goods
15 votes -
US trade group asks VP Mike Pence to ‘seriously consider' invoking 25th Amendment to remove Donald Trump
37 votes