I know there's different standards for music and podcasts but it's just amusing to hear this take from a company that hosts no less than three songs with "pimping ain't easy" in the title and...
However, its rules bar content that makes “dehumanising” statements about a person or groups based on protected characteristics such as gender, identity or sex.
I know there's different standards for music and podcasts but it's just amusing to hear this take from a company that hosts no less than three songs with "pimping ain't easy" in the title and countless others that reference the exact act. I can pull up Big Daddy Kane and hear not only about pimping hoes but also about his homophobia and yet, if it doesn't have a good beat, it breaks terms and conditions.
Spotify also has porngrind/goregrind bands which often has "questionable" song titles. It can be hard to find the lines between artistic license and what constitute an actual statement of an...
Spotify also has porngrind/goregrind bands which often has "questionable" song titles. It can be hard to find the lines between artistic license and what constitute an actual statement of an opinion, but I think music (and other art forms) needs to at least initially be looked at with as a work of fiction. We generally allow for books or movies with plenty of immoral elements, but of course even those can be used to make a political statement where it isn't "just for fun" anymore.
Any red-pill influencer who giggles like a schoolgirl at the thought of a Muslim woman being stoned to death for adultery should not be trusted with dating advice. And Donald Trump bullied Romania...
And Donald Trump bullied Romania into releasing these men from custody. What the fuck?
How did Andrew and Tristan Tate even make it to the point of releasing anything on Spotify? Didn't mainstream social media collectively ban them for their rife misogyny?
I know there's different standards for music and podcasts but it's just amusing to hear this take from a company that hosts no less than three songs with "pimping ain't easy" in the title and countless others that reference the exact act. I can pull up Big Daddy Kane and hear not only about pimping hoes but also about his homophobia and yet, if it doesn't have a good beat, it breaks terms and conditions.
Spotify also has porngrind/goregrind bands which often has "questionable" song titles. It can be hard to find the lines between artistic license and what constitute an actual statement of an opinion, but I think music (and other art forms) needs to at least initially be looked at with as a work of fiction. We generally allow for books or movies with plenty of immoral elements, but of course even those can be used to make a political statement where it isn't "just for fun" anymore.
Any red-pill influencer who giggles like a schoolgirl at the thought of a Muslim woman being stoned to death for adultery should not be trusted with dating advice.
And Donald Trump bullied Romania into releasing these men from custody. What the fuck?
How did Andrew and Tristan Tate even make it to the point of releasing anything on Spotify? Didn't mainstream social media collectively ban them for their rife misogyny?