13 votes

8chan is raided by the FBI regarding California synagogue shooter

@swodinsky:
lmaooooooo 8chan just got search warranted

12 comments

  1. Neverland
    (edited )
    Link
    Sorry about the twitter link but I don’t see this anywhere else yet. Also, some interesting analysis in those tweets.

    Sorry about the twitter link but I don’t see this anywhere else yet. Also, some interesting analysis in those tweets.

  2. [10]
    Eva
    Link
    The person who posted this tweet is a bit of a dunce, aren't they? "8chan account."

    The person who posted this tweet is a bit of a dunce, aren't they? "8chan account."

    1. [5]
      Neverland
      Link Parent
      That seems to be the language in the warrant.

      That seems to be the language in the warrant.

      4 votes
      1. [4]
        Eva
        Link Parent
        Not particularly, unless I'm misreading something; it specifies for "Ch.net"; a site that seemingly has no connection to anyone connected to 8chan whatsoever, judging by ICANN records & archive.org.

        Not particularly, unless I'm misreading something; it specifies for "Ch.net"; a site that seemingly has no connection to anyone connected to 8chan whatsoever, judging by ICANN records & archive.org.

        1 vote
        1. [3]
          Neverland
          Link Parent
          Thanks for looking that up. I wonder what that disconnect is all about. They don’t use the same name servers or anything. Geez, hope they didn’t screw that up and get all this thrown out.

          Thanks for looking that up. I wonder what that disconnect is all about. They don’t use the same name servers or anything. Geez, hope they didn’t screw that up and get all this thrown out.

          3 votes
          1. [2]
            alyaza
            Link Parent
            can we please stop idly speculating about things we don't know about and whether or not they fucked up based on small slivers of evidence from what are basically tertiary sources sources and leave...

            can we please stop idly speculating about things we don't know about and whether or not they fucked up based on small slivers of evidence from what are basically tertiary sources sources and leave it to the people who are actually investigating it?

            1 vote
            1. Eva
              Link Parent
              For the record, my comment wasn't about any govt. agency "fucking up," it was about someone saying an account with a third-party service was an 8chan account.

              For the record, my comment wasn't about any govt. agency "fucking up," it was about someone saying an account with a third-party service was an 8chan account.

              5 votes
    2. [4]
      Eva
      Link Parent
      Second impression: they're also terribly unaware of the culture of chanboards, and seem to be missing the motivation of the shooter in the first place (which is somewhat unsurprising): Ah, I see,...

      Second impression: they're also terribly unaware of the culture of chanboards, and seem to be missing the motivation of the shooter in the first place (which is somewhat unsurprising):

      dude, giving yrself up to authorities is like... the most n00b move ever? maybe? p sure the other channers are gonna chew him out over this one

      Ah, I see, it's an Adweek writer. Because of course it is.

      1 vote
      1. [2]
        Neverland
        Link Parent
        Yeah, that is dumb. This is very interesting though: https://twitter.com/swodinsky/status/1139622901332754434

        Yeah, that is dumb. This is very interesting though: https://twitter.com/swodinsky/status/1139622901332754434

        1 vote
        1. Eva
          Link Parent
          Really wish the poster would stop adding commentary, but yes, that is interesting; the implications of it, at least.

          Really wish the poster would stop adding commentary, but yes, that is interesting; the implications of it, at least.

          1 vote
      2. [2]
        Comment removed by site admin
        Link Parent
        1. Eva
          Link Parent
          You misread; I'm saying the Adweek writer doesn't understand it. As is trivial to tell by the content of their tweets. Don't know the gender, so I used "they." That's why I quoted them.

          You misread; I'm saying the Adweek writer doesn't understand it. As is trivial to tell by the content of their tweets. Don't know the gender, so I used "they." That's why I quoted them.

          2 votes
  3. [2]
    Comment removed by site admin
    Link
    1. Neverland
      Link Parent
      Thanks! May I ask how you found that?

      Thanks! May I ask how you found that?