-
16 votes
-
Show Tildes: we built the world's first legal AI API
22 votes -
US Department of Justice again files demand to break up Google’s search monopoly
27 votes -
Meredith Whittaker said Signal intends to exit Sweden should its government amend existing legislation essentially mandating the end of end-to-end encryption
26 votes -
Experience with data protection laws (GDPR, ePD, CCPA, etc..)
This is a topic I keep revisiting. It's constantly evolving, with new laws in different parts of the world happening pretty often. And also there's a lot of grey area with vague or incomprehensive...
This is a topic I keep revisiting. It's constantly evolving, with new laws in different parts of the world happening pretty often. And also there's a lot of grey area with vague or incomprehensive language that hasn't yet been tested in courts.
I recognize that it's a bit of a niche topic, but I think there are a lot of us at Tildes who have to think about it. After all it potentially impacts anyone maintaining or building a non-platform web presence. It also applies to less obvious things like running an advertising campaign that involves media requested from a server you control (which can therefore potentially log requests).
For my part, I've needed to research laws relating to PII in order to come up with policies and practices in various contexts. In broad strokes it's pretty simple but as you get into details what I continue to find is that there are a lot of conflicting opinions both from professionals and lawyers. A lot of it is still open to interpretation.
I'm wondering what kinds of experience other tildenauts have around data protection and PII? Have you implemented solutions? Do you wonder about it for your own websites? Have you been involved with it at companies where you've worked? Do you have questions about it?
13 votes -
Canada-US cross-border surveillance negotiations raise constitutional and human rights whirlwind under US CLOUD Act
16 votes -
UK orders Apple to let it spy on users’ encrypted accounts
49 votes -
Right to root access
41 votes -
Brazil bans Sam Altman's tech firm Tools for Humanity from paying for iris scans
23 votes -
Amazon to close Quebec facilities, insists it's not because of new union
57 votes -
TikTok makes app unavailable for US users ahead of ban
54 votes -
US Supreme Court unanimously backs law banning TikTok if it’s not sold by its Chinese parent company
48 votes -
New York starts enforcing $15 broadband law that ISPs tried to kill
51 votes -
Supreme Court seems ready to back Texas law limiting access to pornography
20 votes -
TikTok says it plans to shut down site for US unless Supreme Court strikes down law forcing it to sell
38 votes -
UK users: Lobsters needs your help with the Online Safety Act
24 votes -
New California law prohibits using AI as basis to deny insurance claims
51 votes -
Copyright abuse is getting Luigi Mangione merch removed from the internet – artists, merch sellers, and journalists making and posting Luigi media have become the targets of bogus DMCA claims
65 votes -
MasterCard sells my transaction data in "anonymised" form; but I get targeted spam related to credit card use. How does it work?
26 votes -
Sweden's government considering imposing age limits on social media platforms if tech companies find themselves unable to prevent gangs from recruiting young people online
20 votes -
OpenAI whistleblower found dead in San Francisco apartment. Suchir Balaji, 26, claimed the company broke copyright law.
35 votes -
Australia’s social media ban and why it's not cut and dry
Australia’s proposed social media ban is deeply concerning and authoritarian. It's disturbing to see how much of the general public supports this measure. Prominent organizations, including...
Australia’s proposed social media ban is deeply concerning and authoritarian. It's disturbing to see how much of the general public supports this measure.
Prominent organizations, including Amnesty International, the Australian Human Rights Commission, and Electronic Frontiers Australia, have voiced significant concerns about this legislation:
Amnesty International's Explanation of the Social Media Ban
Australian Human Rights Commission on the Proposed Social Media Ban for Under-16s
EFA's Critique of the Social Media Age BanAustralia has a troubling history with internet legislation. Noteworthy examples include the Australian Internet Firewall under Stephen Conroy and Malcolm Turnbull's infamous statement, "The laws of mathematics are very commendable, but the only law that applies in Australia is the law of Australia," regarding encryption backdoors.
While I recognize the issues with social media, "don't feed the trolls," along with maintaining online anonymity and implementing parental controls ( no phones with unfettered internet access ), should work. This law indiscriminately punishes all Australians for the missteps of a few, potentially leading to increased identity theft through phone and email scams and causing older family who are not tech literate to lose connections with their families due to the complexities of government-issued tokens.
Adults will be the ones who are going to be most impacted by this legislation.
The scope of this law is extensive. The Online Safety website suggests that this is merely the beginning, with plans to cover the entire web, including games, adult content, and more. The consequences are profound: the erosion of true anonymity and increased risk to government whistle-blowers and journalistic sources.
Requiring individuals to provide their identity to a third party to access the internet, which many have used freely for decades, is alarming. It threatens to sanitize search results and revoke access to purchased games if users refuse additional identity verification measures. There are no grandfathered exceptions, highlighting the law's intent to de-anonymize the internet.
Although Australia lacks a constitutionally protected right to free speech, this law poses significant risks to whistleblowers and marginalized youth in remote communities. Instead of banning access and creating allure through prohibition, we should address the root causes of why younger people are drawn to such content.
Once entrenched in law, any opposition will be met with accusations of perversion or indifference to child safety, compounded by the spread of misinformation. We must critically assess and address these laws to protect our freedoms and privacy.
There wouldn't be speculation if they defined how they intend the law to work. Instead of a "don't worry about it we will work it out", give people something to say that's not so bad and I can live with it
15 votes -
Australian Parliament bans social media for under-16s with world-first law
61 votes -
AI seeks out racist language in property deeds for termination
18 votes -
Millions of people are using abusive AI ‘Nudify’ bots on Telegram
24 votes -
Brazil's top court threatens to suspend X (formerly Twitter) by Thursday night if Elon Musk does not comply with regulations
23 votes -
It may soon be legal to jailbreak AI to expose how it works
29 votes -
New York passes legislation that would ban 'addictive' social media algorithms for kids
51 votes -
Minnesota repeals law that protected ISPs from municipal competition
22 votes -
US v. Google: As landmark 'monopoly power' trial closes, here's what to look for
21 votes -
A lawsuit argues Meta is required by law to let you control your own feed
30 votes -
ChatGPT provides false information about people, and OpenAI can’t correct it
47 votes -
It's not just TikTok. ByteDance has a variety of apps that could also be banned.
21 votes -
In US lawsuit, ex-Amazon AI exec claims she was asked to ignore IP law
25 votes -
Polish court orders Google to stop favouring its own price-comparison service in search results
16 votes -
America's first right-to-repair bill that bans parts pairing
40 votes -
European Union approves landmark AI law, leapfrogging US to regulate critical but worrying new technology
26 votes -
"By all means, go after big tech. But for the love of the next generation, don’t pretend that it’s going to help vulnerable youth."
33 votes -
Popular AI chatbots found to give error-ridden legal answers
19 votes -
Google formally endorses right to repair, will lobby to pass repair laws
25 votes -
AI and trust
21 votes -
The most dangerous Canadian internet bill you’ve never heard of is a step closer to becoming law
34 votes -
Reddit moderators of r/law and r/scotus filed an amicus brief in US Supreme Court first amendment case Moody v NetChoice LLC
62 votes -
In Canada’s battle with Big Tech, smaller publishers and independent outlets struggle to survive
15 votes -
YouTube anti-adblock detection is illegal in the EU
77 votes -
We were wrong about the GPLs
32 votes -
Google US antitrust trial - judge ordered trial exhibits removed from the web - the Verge responds by publishing them
24 votes -
UK's Online Safety Bill: Crackdown on harmful social media content agreed
27 votes -
California passes strongest right-to-repair bill yet, requiring seven years of parts
39 votes -
The pirate preservationists - a long history
20 votes