-
18 votes
-
Google is testing the ‘impact’ of removing EU news from search results
21 votes -
Google asked to remove ten billion “pirate” search results
29 votes -
Google will now link to The Internet Archive to add more context to Search results
37 votes -
Google violated antitrust laws in online search, US judge rules
47 votes -
Google now only search engine allowed to provide results from Reddit
88 votes -
DuckDuckGo seems like a significantly worse search engine than Google despite SEO bloat, and I think community discussions mislead people by omitting that
In the recent months I started getting dissatisfied with Google the company in general, but also with its search engine due to privacy reasons, and SEO bloat affecting certain searches. A few...
In the recent months I started getting dissatisfied with Google the company in general, but also with its search engine due to privacy reasons, and SEO bloat affecting certain searches. A few weeks ago I switched to Duckduckgo from Google. Some searches are fine but there are three main issues I've been experiencing with Duckduckgo since the switch.
- The search "fails" and shows me results that are tangentially related to the query. Happens quite often and for various topics.
- It shows me a semi-related search results instead of the one I searched for, because it says there are not enough results for my query. Then I have to click again on the small text to search for the actual query.
- The automatic prompts that complete your query are scarce and unsatisfactory.
Because of this I've been switching back and forth between Google and Duckduckgo lately. I don't want to use Google, but Duckduckgo is definitely the worse option in general in my experience. It's better in some searches and shows useful results instead of big site bloat, but my overall experience was one of getting heavily downgraded.
This led me to a criticism about the discussions around this topic. People talk a lot about SEO bloat affecting search results, and it's definitely a real issue. It's especially a problem for some political searches, as it results in you getting propaganda results. However, recommending people Duckduckgo without mentioning its significantly worse search quality seems misleading.
I am of course not against using or recommending Duckduckgo. In fact, I wish them greater success in market share and development, as I think their policies are much better. But I think mentioning Duckduckgo's downsides is important to adequately inform people. I expected a noticeable downgrade, but I didn't expect it to be this worse because nobody mentioned it. As a result, I felt misled, and I definitely didn't know what I was getting into. Being adequately informed would have prevented that, as I would adjust my expectations.
So, this seems to be largely unaddressed in discussions around this topic, and I suspect the echo chamber effect around anti-Google discourse and privacy issues might be to blame.
What are your thoughts? Has anyone experienced something similar?
65 votes -
Before smartphones, an army of real people helped you find stuff on Google
21 votes -
Google just updated its algorithm. The Internet will never be the same.
56 votes -
"&udm=14" strips AI junk from Google results
61 votes -
Google scrambles to manually remove weird AI answers in search
20 votes -
Google begins enforcement of site reputation abuse policy with portions of sites being delisted
16 votes -
The man who killed Google Search
82 votes -
Polish court orders Google to stop favouring its own price-comparison service in search results
16 votes -
How sixteen companies are dominating the world’s Google search results (2024 Edition)
24 votes -
Google announces major update to combat AI-generated spam in search results
21 votes -
What happened to Google Search?
13 votes