15
votes
Hanford Viaduct - California High-Speed Rail construction progress
Link information
This data is scraped automatically and may be incorrect.
- Title
- Hanford Viaduct - September 27, 2024
- Authors
- California High-Speed Rail Authority
- Duration
- 4:01
- Published
- Oct 9 2024
Comment box
California High-Speed Rail is a large transportation project in the US state of California. It ultimately seeks to link the populous metropolitan areas of San Francisco and Los Angeles in its first phase of construction. Pretty much the entire route has been environmentally approved (by far the most arduous bureaucratic hurdle for linear transportation projects), so all that remains is funding and construction. You can see a map of the route here.
Currently, the CAHSR Authority is overseeing the construction of the "Initial Operating Segment" (IOS), between the Central Valley cities of Merced in the north and Bakersfield in the south with stops in Madera, Fresno, and Tulare/Kings Counties. The high-speed track does not yet connect with the SF and LA rail networks, although it will in the future, as long as it receives funding. The IOS is scheduled for completion in ~2027, with trainsets arriving the following year. After testing, which could take another year or two, passenger service will begin around 2030. (It's almost 2025: not so far off!)
This video shows the Hanford Viaduct in the Central Valley, a grade separation project to ensure that there are no conflicts between CAHSR, freight rail, and highway traffic. These enormous structures are essential to the operation of high-speed trains for logistical, safety, and legal reasons. There are hundreds of them along the route, and their construction is one reason why megaprojects like this take a long time. It's like building a hundred horizontal skyscrapers while contending with active traffic around your whole site. In many cases, they also have to relocate canals and utilities before constructing the guideway.
CAHSR is often the target of derision in an endlessly negative media landscape, but seeing actual construction helps demonstrate the real-world progress being made here. And contrary to media narrative, the project is not a "railroad to nowhere"; the fast-growing Central Valley cities mentioned are home to over 1.1 million people. They are an important part of the route from SF to LA and will support its ridership.
For CAHSR to succeed beyond the Central Valley, it requires significant funding from the state of California and, in an ideal world, the federal government. The latter may be unlikely for the next four years, but that's probably okay because they're still finishing up the IOS. The next step after the IOS is most likely going to be the "Valley to Valley" line, an extension from Madera/Merced to San Jose and San Francisco. This is because the Caltrain line in the Bay Area has already been electrified with funding from CAHSR. After that, the Authority will have to connect the track in Bakersfield to the city of Palmdale and beyond to Los Angeles. Future phases of CAHSR are intended to reach Sacramento and San Diego, but there isn't a timeline for any of that.
In theory, all of this could happen concurrently. It pretty much just needs funding. Since basically all of Phase 1 is environmentally cleared, there are no particular barriers to construction otherwise.
Love seeing these progress updates from CAHSR, gives me some faith that I'll see this line operational in my lifetime.
Comment box
Fortunately, the Central Valley segment is just about fully funded, so if you can hold out until 2030–2031, you’ll see it!
Counter-intuitively, I’ve considered the possibility that the hostility of the incoming federal administration to the state of California (and likely withholding of infrastructure grants) will prompt the state government to fund more of the CAHSR project itself. Perhaps another bond measure, or a sales tax, or more cap and trade funding, or something else. There’s a certain “California spirit” that enjoys improving itself in spite of the direction of rest of the country.
Also of note is the Brightline West project connecting Los Angeles and Las Vegas, which will supposedly be done by 2027–2028, in time for the Olympics.
Yeah the next few years will definitely be a bit rough as federal funding dries up. The idea of a state-level tax or bond measure to fund the HSR does make sense to me, I'd certainly support it if it means we'll get the full SF to LA route funded and built lol.
Sorry but that's a disappointingly dull video. Even the "music" is off-puttingly dull! I hoped for more but it never got off the ground
Comment box
Dirt, concrete, and rebar aren’t known for being inherently thrilling. To me, such engineering is interesting for what it represents.
If you’re looking for a video with commentary, the CAHSR Authority’s quarterly construction updates provide a more conventional discussion of progress. You can find those videos, along with interviews, board meetings, and other materials on the CAHSR Authority YouTube channel.
Same could be said for the high-speed rail. Was a bit excited to see so-far useless bridge staging in Fresno last year.
Comment box
Apologies if I’m misinterpreting your sentiment, but did you expect a project scheduled for completion around 2030 to have a surprise early completion in 2024?
If you’re interested in seeing faster construction progress, more could happen concurrently if the state allocates greater funding to the project. But we’re still dealing with the physical world. It takes time to build infrastructure.
Lol not at all. I hadn't visited since it had been officially OK'd, and I was honestly surprised to see since I knew it had run into a few hiccups.
Just the slow moving process was similar to "disappointingly dull", as the video comment I was referring to.
Comment box
Oh, got it. Well I agree with you. It is pretty amazing to see things being physically constructed after it was just an idea in people's heads for so many years. Even if it is a bit glacial.
Being real, the project is happening slower than equivalent European and Asian projects. I wouldn't say that's a problem with CAHSR but rather a problem with American construction in general. Alon Levy writes about this sort of thing often. Americans literally don't know how to build transit cost-effectively. They let the soft costs run wild, and then the hard costs go up because the planning was bad to begin with.
I look at the CAHSR capital outlays and all that every month, and they're working, and they're working hard, but the contingency drawdowns or whatever are sometimes questionable. They sometimes struggle to hire enough workers to be on-schedule. And because the cost of everything increases over time, the longer they wait, the more they spend. They will probably be over budget again in 2-3 years. Not by a whole lot, but it's not a perfect process.
With all that said, I absolutely support the project and believe it should be built pretty much no matter what the cost (within reason). We spend way more on highways annually, and this would be a way more valuable line than most of that. $100 billion for something that lasts decades is no problem to me. The economic, environmental, and social benefits, if they were to be quantified, would be enormously higher than that.