15
votes
US District Court Judge dismisses Hans Niemann's $100 million lawsuit against Magnus Carlsen, among others, in chess cheating scandal
Link information
This data is scraped automatically and may be incorrect.
- Authors
- Ben Morse
- Published
- Jun 28 2023
Good.
Saying "I think he may be cheating" is not the same as saying "he's cheating", it was not a direct accusation and it was fair to assume so given his sketchy postgame interviews and his online track record. Niemann could have handled this so much better and even come out on top of the situation hadn't he let his edgy internet persona spill into the real world.
Hahaha, I truly wonder if this is something Carlsen did. He can be a bit overboard sometimes.
All in all, the article reads like there's a lot of animosity that spiralled out of control. Considering the stats of Hans it may not be outside the realm of possibility that he was indeed cheating.. at least online.
One of the main reasons people aren't willing to give him the benefit of the doubt is that he's already admitted to cheating online himself some years ago. He was just a kid then IIRC since he is still so young, but even if he never even thought about cheating after that, the track record is already tarnished.
if i recall correctly he only admitted of cheating in a couple of games, when in reality chess.com anticheat software detected that he cheated on hundreds of games instead during covid.
He has definitely cheated online. But as far as I'm aware there is zero evidence that he has cheated in real life.
Quite unsurprising - given the wildness of the accusations in the filing and seeming lack of limitation and configuration of scope towards what he might actually feasibly prove in court, it seemed to me that (a bit ironically i suppose) he was primarily attempting to use the filing's content and the act of filing it as a device to publicly slate Carlsen's reputation. This too seems to have backfired, in my opinion.