15 votes

Niacin has long been a public health darling. But an excess could be bad for the heart, study suggests.

1 comment

  1. skybrian
    Link
    From the article: … … … Seems like this raises a lot of questions and they’re going to have to do more studies.

    From the article:

    Niacin, or vitamin B3, has long been a U.S. public health darling to the point that it is added, by law, to cereal products. But a new study published Monday in Nature Medicine points to a potentially concerning effect of an excess of the vitamin: It may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease.

    The study looked into two cohorts of patients without active heart disease, 60% of whom were treated with statins, and found a strong association between a metabolic product of excess niacin and an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events such as a heart attack or stroke. One in four of the people in the study had excess niacin, which doubled their risk of major cardiovascular events to levels comparable with diabetes or a previous heart attack.

    Researchers identified the cause of increased cardiovascular risk in N1-methyl-4-pyridone-3-carboxamide (4PY), a niacin metabolite. They argue that 4PY increases cardiovascular risk through an inflammatory reaction and say they’ve identified a previously unknown pathway that can cause adverse cardiovascular events. In fact, said Hazen, the researchers didn’t set off to study niacin in the first place. They were originally trying to understand why, when traditional risk factors such as high cholesterol, smoking, and diabetes are treated, half of patients still go on to have cardiovascular events.

    “We began by looking to see if there was something in fasting blood samples from subjects who were followed over time to see who went on and developed a heart attack or stroke or died — and it ended up being a compound which was unknown,” said Hazen, referring to 4PY. “And when we finally figured out what it was and where it came from, it can only be made by excess niacin ingestion.”

    Cereals such as wheat and rice are a dietary staple for billions of people. The authors argue that their findings suggest that it may be time to reconsider the mandatory fortification of foods with niacin.

    “There is no doubt that mandated fortification has been one of the best public health programs and was an amazing success,” said Hazen, who notes that there have been no recent U.S. cases of pellagra, a potentially deadly condition caused by niacin deficiency that can lead to diarrhea, dementia, and excruciating mouth sores. Still, he said, it may be time to allow for non-fortified cereal products to be sold in the U.S. — as they are in most parts of the world — to offer an alternative to people who may have increased risk of cardiovascular disease and could benefit from reduced intake of niacin.

    The study does not address the situation of patients taking prescription niacin, which is delivered in concentrations 20 times higher than in supplements, said Daniel Rader, a professor of medicine and genetics at the University of Pennsylvania who was also not involved in the study. “What are the levels of 2PY and 4PY in people who are taking pharmacologic doses of niacin? The expectation would be that they would be astronomically higher because the amount of intake of niacin is orders of magnitude higher,” said Rader. (Hazen responded by noting that while none of the participants in this study took prescription niacin, other studies have reported increased levels of 2PY and 4PY.)

    Seems like this raises a lot of questions and they’re going to have to do more studies.

    10 votes