This book review makes post-apartheid South Africa sound like an unmitigated disaster: … … I’m reluctant to share it because, although it roughly agrees with what I half-remember reading in the...
This book review makes post-apartheid South Africa sound like an unmitigated disaster:
Like the air force, that water system is now basically non-functional. It’s estimated that something like 10 million people no longer have reliable access to running water. When the water does run, it’s frequently filthy and contaminated with human sewage. South Africa had its first urban cholera outbreak in the year 2000, and they are now a regular occurrence. Again, like the air force, this isn’t for lack of money or effort. The state has spent billions on trying to fix the water problems, and the government’s water bureaucracy has tripled in size since 1994. Something else has gone wrong.
Neither of these examples is cherry-picked. Ask about literally any of the necessities for human life, and the picture is the same: basically first-world quality under the apartheid Nationalist government, and basically post-apocalyptic today. The electric grid is failing, with rolling blackouts consuming the country on a daily basis. The rail network, once one of the finest on earth, is now so degraded that mines in the North of the country prefer to truck their products overland to ports in Mozambique rather than risk the rail journey to Durban. The medical system was once the jewel of Africa and now teeters on the brink of collapse, with qualified doctors and nurses fleeing the country in droves. As for education, one South African author notes: “When Anthony Sampson’s authorized biography of Mandela appeared one of its more embarrassing asides was that all the educational institutions which had nourished Mandela had since collapsed. A Mandela could be produced in colonial times, but no longer.”
…
Oversimplifying a bit, [Black Economic Empowerment] was a program in which South African corporations were bullied or threatened into selling some or all of their shares at favorable prices to politically-connected black elites, who generally returned the favor by looting the company’s assets or otherwise running it into the ground (note that this is not the description you will find on Wikipedia). The whole thing was so astoundingly, revoltingly corrupt that even the ANC has had to back off and admit in the face of criticism from the left that something went wrong here.
What made BEE so “successful” is that it was actually far more consensual than you might have guessed from that description. In many cases, the white former owners of these corporations were looking around at the direction of the country and trying to find any possible excuse to unload their assets and get their money out. The trouble was that it was difficult to do that without seeming racist, because obviously racism was the only reason anybody could have doubts about the wisdom of the ANC. The genius of BEE is that it allowed these white elites to perform massive capital flight while simultaneously framing it as a grand anti-racist gesture and a mark of their confidence in the future of the country.
…
The horror of it all is that by this point there were very good drugs that could massively cut the risk of mother-child HIV transmission and somewhat reduced the odds of contracting the virus after a traumatic sexual encounter. There were a lot of traumatic sexual encounters. A contemporaneous survey found that around 60 percent of South Africans believed that forcing sex on somebody was not necessarily violence, and a common “Africanist” belief was that sex with a virgin could cure AIDS, all of which led to extreme levels of child rape. The government then did everything in its power to prevent the victims of these rapes from accessing drugs that could stave off a deadly disease. At first the excuse was that they were too expensive, then when the drug companies called that bluff and offered the drugs for free, it became that they caused “mutations.”
I’m reluctant to share it because, although it roughly agrees with what I half-remember reading in the news, I somewhat distrust the author (based on reading other articles) and have only a shallow knowledge of South Africa. So I’ll just make it a question: Does this hold up? What does this review get wrong about South Africa? Anyone know?
An older review by someone else (scihub can help) suggests that the book itself has a fair bit of value to it, although with some questionable bits. Like accusing murder with no verifyable evidence.
An older review by someone else (scihub can help) suggests that the book itself has a fair bit of value to it, although with some questionable bits. Like accusing murder with no verifyable evidence.
I was born and raised in SA until 18 then I moved to the UK. Half my family now lives in Asia as well as Australia due to the crumbling infrastructure of SA. I remember growing up and not having...
I was born and raised in SA until 18 then I moved to the UK. Half my family now lives in Asia as well as Australia due to the crumbling infrastructure of SA.
I remember growing up and not having any real prospects for the future because my parents couldn't afford uni for me and being a white guy the odds of me getting a job without any kind of degree or qualification would be impossible so my mom shipped me.off to the UK. I also remember the start of the load shedding(blackouts). It was early days but even I could see the government would never solve the problem. So it seemed bleak for the country in the mid 2000s.
While reading these excerpts I wasn't surprised at all. Just a "yeap that sounds about right" from me. Its unfortunate because the ANC should have been better but they proved just as inept and corrupt many other African leaders.
This book review makes post-apartheid South Africa sound like an unmitigated disaster:
…
…
I’m reluctant to share it because, although it roughly agrees with what I half-remember reading in the news, I somewhat distrust the author (based on reading other articles) and have only a shallow knowledge of South Africa. So I’ll just make it a question: Does this hold up? What does this review get wrong about South Africa? Anyone know?
An older review by someone else (scihub can help) suggests that the book itself has a fair bit of value to it, although with some questionable bits. Like accusing murder with no verifyable evidence.
I was born and raised in SA until 18 then I moved to the UK. Half my family now lives in Asia as well as Australia due to the crumbling infrastructure of SA.
I remember growing up and not having any real prospects for the future because my parents couldn't afford uni for me and being a white guy the odds of me getting a job without any kind of degree or qualification would be impossible so my mom shipped me.off to the UK. I also remember the start of the load shedding(blackouts). It was early days but even I could see the government would never solve the problem. So it seemed bleak for the country in the mid 2000s.
While reading these excerpts I wasn't surprised at all. Just a "yeap that sounds about right" from me. Its unfortunate because the ANC should have been better but they proved just as inept and corrupt many other African leaders.