-
7 votes
-
C.S. Peirce on science and belief
4 votes -
Like Michael Jackson and R Kelly's songs but not them? Ethical approaches for how to deal with it.
11 votes -
"Work," from "The Philosophy of Andy Warhol"
4 votes -
Two kinds of freedom
8 votes -
If anyone can see the morally unthinkable online, what then?
5 votes -
"How to do what you love": An essay on finding goals and discovering what things you really enjoy doing.
9 votes -
Who is the doomer? - Dealing with an age of hopelessness
8 votes -
The cultural significance of cyberpunk
7 votes -
The 'debate of the century': What happened when Jordan Peterson debated Slavoj Žižek
8 votes -
"Ethics" and ethics
6 votes -
Moral circle expansion: How humanity’s idea of who deserves moral concern has grown — and will keep growing
9 votes -
The banality of empathy
4 votes -
Logical Consequence
4 votes -
Noam Chomsky & Michel Foucault - On human nature
5 votes -
The philosopher redefining equality
9 votes -
Socrates versus Roger Stone
9 votes -
If universities sacrifice philosophy on the altar of profit, what’s next?
7 votes -
The Principle of Charity: on the Importance of Using Constructive Arguments
8 votes -
Do you have a moral duty to leave Facebook?
31 votes -
Believing without evidence is always morally wrong
10 votes -
Does anyone here share a passion for spiritual development, the occult, metaphysics, or fringe science/academia?
One of my biggest hobbies and passions over the last 10 or 15 years has been essentially all of the above. I'm not the smartest or the most well-read lady out there by any means but I enjoy...
One of my biggest hobbies and passions over the last 10 or 15 years has been essentially all of the above. I'm not the smartest or the most well-read lady out there by any means but I enjoy exploring the more shadowy realms of discourse. There's lots and lots of dross but occasionally a nugget of something magnificent, and over the years it's eroded away my original scientific materialist atheism completely and my thinking now is more animist, panpsychist, deist. I've spent years off and on experimenting with (actual, not stage) magic, and though I was never super committed to the full ceremonial experience like others I've seen, it's become a part of how I think.
So I was wondering if there's any here that don't fit into the typical scientific materialist box in one form or another. And if so, what're you reading or experimenting with right now?
Currently I'm reading through Conversations with God and it's persuaded me to start practicing loving-kindness meditation. I've only been at that a few days but I'm interested to see what impact it has on my daily life. It's definitely true that up until these past few days I've never actively focused on trying to love myself and others, which kind of surprises me when I think about it. But that sort of thing isn't really something I see emphasized in our culture or in my own little circle.
How about you?
21 votes -
About time: why western philosophy can only teach us so much
6 votes -
How alt-right is Friedrich Nietzsche really?
6 votes -
Philosophical/cognitive works on the concept of "pattern"?
I'm interested in patterns and culture. I think it's a fascinating topic from many perspectives. Mathematically there are many tools for pattern analysis and formation, but at the same time...
I'm interested in patterns and culture. I think it's a fascinating topic from many perspectives. Mathematically there are many tools for pattern analysis and formation, but at the same time philosophically our minds try to make things fit into patterns generally (maybe because it requires more energy to remember a whole thing than a set of rules that describe the thing). A mathematical example of cases where order arises from pure disorder (or maximum entropy) would be Ramsey theory.
I'd like to discuss the cultural influence on our pattern analysis/synthesis, but also explore a bit what is a pattern, whether everything is a pattern or nothing is a pattern, whether patterns are interesting in themselves or not, etc.
I was wondering if anyone has recommendations for readings in this area, or if anyone has an opinion on it. I know of many works regarding a single pattern (for example the different theories of linguistics, the different theories of music, the different theories of cooking... you get the idea) but I've never seen a meta-perspective on why are we so interested on patterns and whether our approach actually makes sense.
Thanks!
9 votes -
Postmodernism is not identity politics
7 votes -
Neoliberalism, world music, and corporate aesthetics
7 votes -
You think you're free? Think again.
6 votes -
What's next after Liberal Democracy
5 votes -
What does it mean to die well?
3 votes -
George Orwell: Why socialists don't believe in fun
6 votes -
I'm having a hard time reading the Myth of Sisyphus, is there a more accessible intro to absurdism?
I read some things about the philosophy and I'd really like to go deeper into it, but the book is so hard for me to read! I can't make sense of much of what I'm reading, maybe it's the vocabulary...
I read some things about the philosophy and I'd really like to go deeper into it, but the book is so hard for me to read! I can't make sense of much of what I'm reading, maybe it's the vocabulary I'm not sure... Is there a more accessible book about absurdism?
7 votes -
Friedrich Nietzsche and the alt right
13 votes -
Siddhartha discussion
12 votes -
Mass authentic
5 votes -
Purpose and existence in a post-scarcity civilization
6 votes -
How does language change our perception of reality? Does it reflect fundamental limitations of human understanding?
After seeing some interest in philosophical discussion threads in this group last night, here's one for all of you. Ever since I watched the movie Arrival and saw this quote, I've had this set of...
After seeing some interest in philosophical discussion threads in this group last night, here's one for all of you.
Ever since I watched the movie Arrival and saw this quote, I've had this set of questions about humans and how our minds and our perception of reality is influenced by language. I'm going to throw some of those questions out below as a discussion starter and see where we end up. Sorry they're a bit general, feel free to restate any of them to be more specific or more interesting to you.
How does language limit us? Is our inability to really understand and explain concepts such as quantum reality, existence past an event horizon, or a scenario without spacetime (e.g. prior to the big bang) a product of the limitations of language or is it a fundamental limitation of humanity? Can language evolve to be able to capture such concepts? If language does evolve, how will it affect our perception of reality?
13 votes -
A Shaggy and dog story
2 votes -
The mystery of the millionaire metaphysician
4 votes -
Ideology, intelligence, and capital with Nick Land
1 vote -
Speaking on behalf of … In the tapestry of diverse social groups, the loudest and most extreme get heard. To whom should we actually listen?
5 votes -
Say goodbye to the information age: it’s all about reputation now
25 votes -
Voltaire and the Buddha: How the French Enlightenment thinker prefigured an approach now familiar in the West
5 votes -
What can Aristotle teach us about happiness?
6 votes -
The mind-expanding ideas of Andy Clark
8 votes -
Cyborg discourse is useless: Philosophy, ethics and technology
5 votes -
Steven Pinker's arguments are flawed; this article shows why
4 votes -
Truth and consequences: In complicated times, a case for more skepticism
6 votes