22 votes

Hungarian president Tamás Sulyok signs constitutional amendment ending his own mandate

4 comments

  1. [4]
    unkz
    Link
    In America, that age limit alone would remove Alito, Thomas, Sotomayor, and Roberts. I am a little skeptical that allowing such major turnover will be good though, 9 years is short. Even 12 was short.

    In America, that age limit alone would remove Alito, Thomas, Sotomayor, and Roberts. I am a little skeptical that allowing such major turnover will be good though, 9 years is short. Even 12 was short.

    7 votes
    1. [3]
      MimicSquid
      Link Parent
      USA Supreme court justices are elected for life, and the average tenure is 16 years. Because senior judges are the ones who get the nod for the top court, they don't have decades of good life left...

      USA Supreme court justices are elected for life, and the average tenure is 16 years. Because senior judges are the ones who get the nod for the top court, they don't have decades of good life left in them when they get there. Is a 9 year term really that awful?

      5 votes
      1. skybrian
        Link Parent
        More recently that average is a lot higher. From this article: To get the average term down to 9 years, there would need to be one new judge appointed per year and that seems like too much...

        More recently that average is a lot higher. From this article:

        The average term length of U.S. Supreme Court justices is by far the longest among established constitutional democracies. With no limits on tenure, the average Supreme Court term since 1993 has reached 28 years — over twice as long as most peer countries — making the United States a notable global outlier.

        To get the average term down to 9 years, there would need to be one new judge appointed per year and that seems like too much turnover. Imagine if Trump were able to appoint 8 judges! Two new judges per 4-year term, resulting in 18-year terms, seems more reasonable, though appointing 4 judges still a lot of power for a two-term president.

        It seems like making it a fixed number of appointments per term instead of waiting for people to resign or die would be an improvement.

        7 votes
      2. unkz
        (edited )
        Link Parent
        Yes. It’s not good if a single president can realistically replace the entire bench, which could easily happen in a double term. It’s even worse in Hungary where they are proposing 12 year terms...

        Yes. It’s not good if a single president can realistically replace the entire bench, which could easily happen in a double term. It’s even worse in Hungary where they are proposing 12 year terms for the elected officials and 9 year terms for judges.

        I am more inclined to something like a 20 year limit, and a cap at 70 which is about a generation and a very rough safeguard against senility and just being totally out of touch with the modern world. Good stability, less dinosaurs. Wtf is with Thomas poisoning the court for 35 years? That limit would also kick Alito and Roberts btw.

        5 votes