Is the Helsinki meeting the tipping point for US politicians?
From what I've seen, it has had a universally bad reaction. From D. From R. From every news network out there. Is this the tipping point?
31
votes
-
-
US President Donald Trump's trade offensive is producing brutal local headlines
9 votes -
The EU and Japan have signed an unprecedented free trade agreement which will create one of the world's largest trading blocs
21 votes -
California judge halts deportations of reunited migrant families
8 votes -
At last, a law that could have stopped Tony Blair and George W Bush invading. The Hague’s new crime of aggression might give belligerent heads of states a reason to pause.
10 votes -
Israel in turmoil over bill allowing Jews and Arabs to be segregated
7 votes -
Ocasio-Cortez floats a “sub-caucus” of progressives willing to vote together as a bloc
7 votes -
Donald Trump hints at the Queen's private views on UK Brexit
3 votes -
What are the limits of viewpoint diversity?
4 votes -
Eritrea and Ethiopia have made peace. How it happened and what next
11 votes -
The Russian "firehose of falsehood" propaganda model - Why it might work and options to counter It
11 votes -
‘Evil has won’ - Pro-American Germans feel betrayed
8 votes -
Guccifer 2.0 slipped up and revealed he was a Russian intelligence officer
6 votes -
The futility of trade war explained by economist Michael Pettis
6 votes -
Sabotage laws give Australian PM Peter Dutton new powers over energy, port facilities
0 votes -
Russian influence campaign sought to exploit Americans' trust in local news
16 votes -
Miami grandma targeted as US takes aim at naturalized immigrants with prior offenses
23 votes -
Boris Johnson resigns in major Brexit blow to UK PM Theresa May
24 votes -
China vows firm and forcefull retaliation for $200 Billion US tariff threat
11 votes -
Beijing hits out at Washington for ‘playing Taiwan card’ after US warships sail through strait
4 votes -
Democrats value communal personality traits while Republicans value agentic traits
4 votes -
Marc Elrich edges out David Blair in Democratic primary for Montgomery County executive
5 votes -
Two weeks after “ending” US family separation, parents still can’t contact their children
7 votes -
Northrop Grumman employee who allegedly attended violent white-supremacist rally is no longer employed at the company
10 votes -
Oppression obsession
2 votes -
Data suggest that gentrifying neighborhoods powered Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's victory
6 votes -
Canada tariffs on US goods from ketchup to lawn mowers begin
24 votes -
Australia is stopping its direct aid to Palestinians, and will instead give to the United Nations' humanitarian relief efforts.
6 votes -
Susan Collins, pivotal US moderate, says ‘hostility’ to Roe would sway her vote
13 votes -
Democrat. Dictator. Which path will Thailand's Prayuth Chan-ocha choose?
6 votes -
A better reason to delay US Justice Anthony Kennedy’s replacement (People under the cloud of investigation do not get to pick the judges who may preside over their cases.)
14 votes -
US Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy is retiring
63 votes -
A political scientist argues that the Democratic Party must play "procedural hardball" too: The Republicans aren’t engaged in a policy fight. instead, they’re waging a “procedural war.”
13 votes -
John Bolton just did a complete 180 on his Russia stance after meeting with Vladimir Putin
7 votes -
Tips for staying civil while debating child prisons
23 votes -
How come seven people (the US Supreme Court) can have so much power?
I am not American but it seems to me that it is an incredibly broken system that 7 judges can essentially halt an entire country's progress. They decided that corporations have rights like a...
I am not American but it seems to me that it is an incredibly broken system that 7 judges can essentially halt an entire country's progress. They decided that corporations have rights like a person, they can decide if gay marriage is legal, they can decide basically anything if they wanted as I understand it.
So why does this even exist? Surely such gigantic decisions should be left to a parliament or something.
19 votes -
Inside the White House’s quiet campaign to create a US Supreme Court opening
9 votes -
EU leaders reach breakthrough deal on migrant crisis
5 votes -
Democrats are wrong about Republicans. Republicans are wrong about Democrats.
27 votes -
Portland anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement occupiers evicted in pre-dawn raid by Department of Homeland Security officers in riot gear
16 votes -
'We need more time': Malcolm Turnbull government concedes defeat on Australian company tax cuts
3 votes -
Young, progressive, DSA-backed Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ousted ten-term incumbent in New York primary
31 votes -
US Supreme Court delivers a sharp blow to labor unions
13 votes -
US Supreme Court upholds Donald Trump travel ban
26 votes -
In Louisiana, Donald Trump's trade war spooks America's biggest port
5 votes -
How James Comey intervened to kill WikiLeaks' US immunity deal
4 votes -
Saudi moves forward with plan to turn Qatar into island
3 votes -
Australia to spend nearly $7 billion buying unmanned military planes from America
5 votes -
Algeria expels thousands of migrants in forced Sahara march
6 votes -
In Turkish election, jailed candidate seeks presidency and to keep Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's party below majority in parliament
14 votes