-
15 votes
-
Aleksandr Solzhenytsyn essay Live Not By Lies
6 votes -
How progressives froze the American dream
10 votes -
Protesters demonstrate outside Tesla showrooms in US
38 votes -
Eastern Kentucky activists bought land where feds wanted to build a prison
10 votes -
TikTok ban fueled by Israel, not China: US Congressional insiders spill the beans on how the law was passed
17 votes -
Donald Trump media company sues a Brazilian Supreme Court justice investigating Jair Bolsonaro
13 votes -
Europeans need to reduce their dangerous dependence on an adversarial America
46 votes -
Denmark will spend an additional €6.7bn on defence over the next two years, amid the ongoing threat Russia poses to Europe, PM Mette Frederiksen has announced
11 votes -
I'm alarmed by the apparent lack of an actual deep state
Yes I know the "deep state" is just a phrase that means different things to different people. But Trump is completely out of control and undermining the very fabric of American society and world...
Yes I know the "deep state" is just a phrase that means different things to different people. But Trump is completely out of control and undermining the very fabric of American society and world politics. Siding with Russia, undermining long time relationships with close allies, threatening invading Canada and other countries, calling himself a King. His next step seems to be dismantling the military industrial complex (drastically cutting military spending, reducing American power worldwide).
Isn't there supposed to be some people who are sort of secretly in charge and prevent a single traitorous idiot from destroying the world order, whatever that is? "The Invisible Government"?. Don't most of us sort of believe that JFK was removed by internal actors for much less?
What is really going on here? Is a large amount of the US government completely captured by Russia? Or is it exactly what it seems to be - nobody expected a handful of rich corrupt idiots to just take over and the handful of people who could stop it are just letting it happen. I mean, I can see how it was a serious of unfortunate events, mostly caused by the corruption in the Republican party which allowed a seditionist to get away with trying to overthrow the government and Biden's DOJ just sleeping for about 3 years. But along the way you'd think there would be better checks against all of this.
42 votes -
Brazil’s former President Jair Bolsonaro has been charged over an alleged coup. What’s next for him?
9 votes -
Who's afraid of Hasan Piker?
17 votes -
Donald Trump directs US Treasury to stop making pennies
46 votes -
US President Donald Trump order challenges independence of Federal Communications Commission, Federal Trade Commission and financial regulators
20 votes -
The legal blueprint for radical federalism - to protect state autonomy in the US
9 votes -
A quarter of US shoppers have dumped favorite stores over political stances
22 votes -
How can one determine "true" sentiment?
In an age of increasing misinformation and division, I've found that it's increasingly easy to find yourself in an echo chamber of opinions (of people and/or bots). And when I go searching outside...
In an age of increasing misinformation and division, I've found that it's increasingly easy to find yourself in an echo chamber of opinions (of people and/or bots). And when I go searching outside that echo chamber, I usually don't find well reasoned discussion, but a different echo chamber with the opposite opinion.
This is especially true on sites like Reddit and Twitter, but also applies to pretty much every website (including Tildes) to some extent. Even newspapers aren't helpful as they are all largely owned by a handful of billionaires with an agenda. And real life isn't much better. My friends and family all share similar values and ideals, which is great for getting along, but it doesn't help me figure out how many people actually support something in particular.
The closest thing I've found to objective polling are elections. Unfortunately, they largely group everything into one of two buckets and don't have room for nuance on individual topics. Also, a lot of people don't even vote, which doesn't necessarily muddy the data, but it does leave out the opinions of a lot of people.
Is it even possible to determine this without an individual referendum on each topic? Am I worrying too much about something unknowable?
Some example issues
(copy/pasted from my reply to chocobean)
-
Belief in annexation of Canada as the 51st state. Most people (that I've seen) are not in favour of this, but some people are super gung-ho about this. Is this bot-led behaviour, or is there really such a large number of people that want to invade Canada? And how many Canadians want to become a state? Is it any, or are they all bots? How can I tell if it's 10%, 1%, or 0.1% of the population that actually wants this? A gut feeling from everything I've seen online tells me that more Americans want this than Canadians, but that doesn't really mean much without an anchor point.
-
Similarly, trampling individual rights (especially when it comes to LGBTQ+ policies). The current US administration is doing everything they can to destroy this. I've seen similar sentiment in Canada, but I don't know how much this is supported by either population. Does everyone who didn't vote or who voted Republican hate queer people? Hopefully not. But there's no way to separate (in the data) a Republican full of hatred from a Republican who thought that Trump would fix the economy and prioritized that above all else. So how many people hate "the gays"? How many people say they don't hate gay people, but also don't care if they're collateral damage in a fight against "transgender indoctrination"? Maybe nuance like that doesn't actually matter, but assuming it does, the nuance disappears in any online discussion and can't be properly observed.
-
Sentiment about [country]'s position in Palestine/Israel. Everything I've seen leads me to believe that almost every politician supports Israel, and almost every non-politician supports Palestine. Obviously there's a lot more nuance to "support" than I'm giving here, but it's hard to actually believe that the divide is so stark and well-defined.
13 votes -
-
Timothy Snyder: Appeasement at Munich
7 votes -
Analysis of US President Donald Trump's executive orders focusing on impact to countries in the Global South
11 votes -
The path to American authoritarianism - what comes after democratic breakdown
33 votes -
Remarks by Singapore minister for defence Dr Ng Eng Hen at the BMW Foundation Leaders Roundtable, “On the horns of a trilemma: Geopolitical recession, technological leadership and energy security"
6 votes -
What insights do you have as to why and how the US right is accepting blatant corruption and why the government cuts are so extreme and unrelated to stated goals?
This question was inspired by a question from a US immigrant citizen who came from a country that had been under Soviet political hegemony. They said that in their experience authoritarianism and...
This question was inspired by a question from a US immigrant citizen who came from a country that had been under Soviet political hegemony. They said that in their experience authoritarianism and corruption were kept camoflauged for fear of political backlash, but our new US government is shameless.
I'll put my tentative answer in the comments. I'm very interested to hear your thoughts if you care to share.
35 votes -
H.R.1161 - To authorize the US President to enter into negotiations to acquire Greenland and to rename Greenland as "Red, White, and Blueland".
34 votes -
You have 1.000.000 EUR to spend on protecting European democracy. What do you spend it on?
I would like to hear your opinions. 1MM eur is not a lot; how do you spend it most efficiently? Do you use it as a lever to raise more money? Do you tackle grassroots efforts? This is a “how do we...
I would like to hear your opinions. 1MM eur is not a lot; how do you spend it most efficiently? Do you use it as a lever to raise more money? Do you tackle grassroots efforts?
This is a “how do we fight back” question.
My requirement is that the suggestions are practical and relevant for today’s world, not an idealised version of it. But nothing is off limits, be creative.
If you have suggestions for different amounts I’ll also hear them.
24 votes -
Donald Trump government pulls hundreds of videos from US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's YouTube channel
22 votes -
We found the $2 trillion in US government spending cuts that Department of Government Efficiency seeks
25 votes -
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement struggles to boost arrest numbers despite infusion of resources
22 votes -
US farmers feel painful impact of new policies
39 votes -
The feckless opposition
22 votes -
What is the purpose of government?
Succinctly as possible, what is the purpose of government? And with genuine effort to avoid condescension or disparagement, what do you think someone politically opposite to you would say if they...
Succinctly as possible, what is the purpose of government? And with genuine effort to avoid condescension or disparagement, what do you think someone politically opposite to you would say if they were to thoughtfully articulate an answer to the same question?
12 votes -
Attorneys are resigning in response to orders from US President Donald Trump's government
US attorney - Danielle Sassoon US attorney - Hagen Scotten
42 votes -
Only about 40% of the Ted Cruz "woke science" US database is woke science
18 votes -
Interview - how Elon Musk blurs the lines of US free speech and raises tough first amendment questions
11 votes -
Top US election security watchdog forced to stop election security work
21 votes -
Over 60,000 foreigners could lose their right to remain in France due to new language requirements
12 votes -
Thousands of US probationary employees fired as Donald Trump administration directs agencies to carry out widespread layoffs
23 votes -
Denmark's policy of dispersing residents from neighbourhoods with large ethnic minorities is discriminatory, an adviser to the European Union's top court said
7 votes -
Arizona attorney general Kris Mayes: This is a coup
43 votes -
White nationalist forces consolidate power alongside Elon Musk’s junta - a second update on Elon Musk's coup from our intrepid imaginary foreign correspondent
27 votes -
The age of the coward is here, where America’s most powerful corporations, once eager to preach their values, now fold like cheap umbrellas at the first gust of political wind
30 votes -
Non-Americans: How's it going?
Obvious bit of a shitshow over here. Seems to be drowning out the typical international news I see with even "international" news stories being about how the US is doing something stupid in...
Obvious bit of a shitshow over here. Seems to be drowning out the typical international news I see with even "international" news stories being about how the US is doing something stupid in reference to another country.
37 votes -
Denmark least corrupt country, according to Corruption Perceptions Index, closely followed by Finland – New Zealand is replaced by Singapore to make up the top three least corrupt for 2024
17 votes -
Fourteen states sue Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump, calling billionaire’s role unconstitutional
30 votes -
When US Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids go awry, reporting gets blamed
10 votes -
Danish petition to buy California attracts hundreds of thousands of signatures
10 votes -
Statement from New York City Comptroller Brad Lander on the Donald Trump administration’s illegal reversal of Federal Emergency Management Agency funding
23 votes -
US President Donald Trump hiring cuts create chaos as Yosemite National Park tries to prepare for crowded spring and summer seasons
17 votes -
Is this a coup?
42 votes -
The American Bar Association supports the rule of law
38 votes -
US Transportation Security Administration workers who are trans forbidden from performing pat down searches
25 votes