Evidence from anthropic around the tradeoffs of different ways of using AI, where the more you delegate the more your skills will atrophy. However, using AI to generate code snippets can still be...
Evidence from anthropic around the tradeoffs of different ways of using AI, where the more you delegate the more your skills will atrophy. However, using AI to generate code snippets can still be net positive. n=52 isn't super conclusive but still an interesting topic, looking forward to future research.
Also interesting that this is something anthropic researchers feel comfortable publishing about when it could be pretty easily spun into something anti-AI
The bottom of the page links to the preprint on arXiv, which goes into more detail. I'm not in a position to quickly evaluate the methods and results, but an immediate worry would be that...
The bottom of the page links to the preprint on arXiv, which goes into more detail. I'm not in a position to quickly evaluate the methods and results, but an immediate worry would be that anthropic is not a disinterested party in this project. I wonder how much that has affected their design choices for this experiment and their interpretation of the results.
Evidence from anthropic around the tradeoffs of different ways of using AI, where the more you delegate the more your skills will atrophy. However, using AI to generate code snippets can still be net positive. n=52 isn't super conclusive but still an interesting topic, looking forward to future research.
Also interesting that this is something anthropic researchers feel comfortable publishing about when it could be pretty easily spun into something anti-AI
The bottom of the page links to the preprint on arXiv, which goes into more detail. I'm not in a position to quickly evaluate the methods and results, but an immediate worry would be that anthropic is not a disinterested party in this project. I wonder how much that has affected their design choices for this experiment and their interpretation of the results.