I can't understand journalists that remain on X. The system is explicitly designed to promote voices that are opposed to the values they (supposedly) represent.
And if you were to remove the first link in that chain, if there were no journalists on there at all, I genuinely do think that entire ecosystem would completely break down. Or at the very least disappear inside its own filter bubble. Something to consider.
I can't understand journalists that remain on X. The system is explicitly designed to promote voices that are opposed to the values they (supposedly) represent.
The illusion that everybody is still there perhaps? I'll suggest to my privacy leaning friends that they nuke Instagram and Facebook and they'll feel far better, but somehow, they can't bring...
The illusion that everybody is still there perhaps?
I'll suggest to my privacy leaning friends that they nuke Instagram and Facebook and they'll feel far better, but somehow, they can't bring themselves to disconnect.
You'd think that people so disgusted with their "algorithm" would take action, but as we all know, routine is a powerful drug.
I love(hate) how Twitter comments have become a stand-in for what TV news journalists used to call Streeters. No, a random account is not a decent sample of what "people" are saying. Anonymity is...
I love(hate) how Twitter comments have become a stand-in for what TV news journalists used to call Streeters.
No, a random account is not a decent sample of what "people" are saying.
Anonymity is exactly that - stop with this foolish practice of calling text a person.
I can't understand journalists that remain on X. The system is explicitly designed to promote voices that are opposed to the values they (supposedly) represent.
The illusion that everybody is still there perhaps?
I'll suggest to my privacy leaning friends that they nuke Instagram and Facebook and they'll feel far better, but somehow, they can't bring themselves to disconnect.
You'd think that people so disgusted with their "algorithm" would take action, but as we all know, routine is a powerful drug.
Journalists still source it, which is another problem. And they do that to create outrage headlines, “here’s why people are upset about xyz”
I love(hate) how Twitter comments have become a stand-in for what TV news journalists used to call Streeters.
No, a random account is not a decent sample of what "people" are saying.
Anonymity is exactly that - stop with this foolish practice of calling text a person.