Even if they did, who's to say they wouldn't have been able to without this technology. There's really no way to prove its usefulness is better than it's intrusiveness. Especially given the...
Even if they did, who's to say they wouldn't have been able to without this technology.
There's really no way to prove its usefulness is better than it's intrusiveness. Especially given the sensitive nature of what they do.
Actually the only "terrorism" thwarted has been done by HumInt. Or through "Human Intelligence" gathering and not SIGNIT or signals intelligence gathering....
Actually the only "terrorism" thwarted has been done by HumInt. Or through "Human Intelligence" gathering and not SIGNIT or signals intelligence gathering.
Very interesting read. It'd say it's a fair bet that the NSA can access anything network based by now.
Has the NSA actually stopped a terrorist attack with these programs?
Even if they did, who's to say they wouldn't have been able to without this technology.
There's really no way to prove its usefulness is better than it's intrusiveness. Especially given the sensitive nature of what they do.
Actually the only "terrorism" thwarted has been done by HumInt. Or through "Human Intelligence" gathering and not SIGNIT or signals intelligence gathering.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/nsa-program-stopped-no-terror-attacks-says-white-house-panel-flna2D11783588