20
votes
Captive audience: How companies make millions charging prisoners to send an email
Link information
This data is scraped automatically and may be incorrect.
- Authors
- Victoria Law, Jane C. Hu, Peter Burrows, Lauren Goode, Kenneth R. Rosen, Daniel AlarcÓn, Andy Greenberg
- Word count
- 2243 words
It's getting harder to tell who the criminals are...
Basic communications with their families should be a right not a commodity.
It's honestly outright exploitation.
How do we change the punitive culture surrounding incarceration? That's the biggest problem IMO, aside from systems/law that incentivize incarceration. It's so easy to villainize people stripped of their rights and separated from society. I feel like we're light years away from ensuring basic human rights for convicts and establishing an end goal of rehabilitation. Our prison system creates more prisoners.
I couldn't agree more. It's so easy to dehumanize prisoners. At what point does limiting freedoms for punishment (rehabilitation) become cruel and unusual? Yes, we don't expect them to be super comfortable as if they're on vacation, but we need to better define what their most basic rights should be.
And honestly, anywhere someone's making gross profits needs more scrutiny.
"And we will nickel and dime that positive network of support to death," JPay, probably.
I guess they could just give each prisoner an e-mail address, but then how would anyone profit while adding absolutely no value?
This is pretty ridiculous, I have no problems at all with a company profiting off of prison services, but this is as exploitative as the phone companies which provided dollar per minute phone calls years ago. Prisoners are in the care of the government, which is why sleeping with a prisoner is essentially considered rape in many places, even if consentual. The supreme court has stated that prisoners have a 1st amendment right to communicate with the outside world, I wish the government had a responsibility to make sure those under it's care are not exploited for using that right.
Exactly. I'm fine with JPay selling email access to inmates, but you can't just block regular mail access without a similarly priced alternative.
I would even argue that this constitutes as obstruction of mail.
Exactly. It's not as if it's just as simple as "lets provide email access to prisoners". I'm sure the company needs to invest in security, hardware, etc that can be used safely by prisoners and can not be exploited by criminal elements. I don't expect it to be free, but to charge upwards of 50 cents per email, with limits to what that email can contain, is completely exploitative. Any digital solution should be required by law to cap out it's charges to be the same as a US postal letter, in my opinion. As for how to limit the size of an email, i'm not sure what's fair or not on that. I assume the prison still has to read and scan through any emails before they go to the prisoner? If anything the limits should match what the postal limits are, if any.
Wasn't sure of the right group to post this, so i figured i'd post in ~tech because of the email angle.