There's a discussion to be had about the shifting of the workforce as jobs are automated and the severity at which it will affect existing workers, but I've yet to see an argument that has...
There's a discussion to be had about the shifting of the workforce as jobs are automated and the severity at which it will affect existing workers, but I've yet to see an argument that has convinced me companies will somehow be able to pay humans less money, while making large swaths of the workforce obsolete, without shooting themselves in the foot.
I just can't grasp a situation where the obsolescence of labor argument pointed at AI is not an economically feasible outcome within our system. It's interesting to see an argument from the perspective of the irreplaceable value of humans, especially in delivering value to other humans
There's a discussion to be had about the shifting of the workforce as jobs are automated and the severity at which it will affect existing workers, but I've yet to see an argument that has convinced me companies will somehow be able to pay humans less money, while making large swaths of the workforce obsolete, without shooting themselves in the foot.
I just can't grasp a situation where the obsolescence of labor argument pointed at AI is not an economically feasible outcome within our system. It's interesting to see an argument from the perspective of the irreplaceable value of humans, especially in delivering value to other humans