-
8 votes
-
Software developers are not okay
41 votes -
The modern tech interview
19 votes -
Fired OpenAI safety researchers dispute misconduct claims, warn of chilling effect
9 votes -
Productivity tools on MacOS
Hi all, Recently came into possession of a Macbook Pro as a work laptop and since I've never used them in a professional capacity I'm at a loss on what tools are available for Mac. I was wondering...
Hi all,
Recently came into possession of a Macbook Pro as a work laptop and since I've never used them in a professional capacity I'm at a loss on what tools are available for Mac.
I was wondering if anyone has any must have tools for Mac that I shouldn't miss out on that makes the experience overall better. While the title says "productivity" I don't mean just things like Notion or Obsidian, I'm looking for stuff that contributes to a professional environment in more ways than one.
Think calendar, folder structure/navigation, automation/macros, configuration enablers, must have settings, all that jazz. I'm mainly looking for stuff that helps me work with the machine, but hey I wouldn't mind knowing what makes MacOS in general more agreeable to use for someone that wants more settings.In short: What are your must have thangs for MacOS?
Edit to add: it's a 2022 MacBook Pro with an M2 Apple Silicon. I have full rights to the system and can install any tool, barring any enterprise licence requirements. I think most of you picked up that install rights wasn't a worry on account of the open prompt.
22 votes -
OpenAI ignored employees’ warnings about safely testing AI models (gifted link)
12 votes -
Commodified intelligence
9 votes -
AI abundance requires a four-hour workweek
16 votes -
Deepfake crisis spreads across Finnish schools, workplaces and military – law does not prevent the creating of such material
19 votes -
Young adults in the US are increasingly wary of AI, concerned it will take jobs
47 votes -
AI usage patterns in software teams
21 votes -
Do I belong in tech anymore?
66 votes -
Mark Zuckerberg's increasingly bizarre war on whistleblowers
55 votes -
Ramp data shows heavy AI adopters hire more
10 votes -
AI job grief
19 votes -
Our workplace LLM mass delusion
40 votes -
Amazon shuts down internal AI leaderboard after employees cheated
27 votes -
Samsung chip workers to get $340,000 average bonus in AI boom
26 votes -
Bolt CEO says he let go of his entire HR team for creating problems that didn’t exist: ‘Those problems disappeared when I let them go’
37 votes -
I made a post here two years ago about starting my first SWE job, since then I've been promoted and have recently recieved a very exciting job offer
31 votes -
Google DeepMind workers in UK vote to unionize
17 votes -
What are the current channels to find remote work?
I haven't been on the market for a couple of years, but I might be soon-ish. I used to browse websites such as remoteok, or look on LinkedIn but it seems that those are mostly full of ghost...
I haven't been on the market for a couple of years, but I might be soon-ish.
I used to browse websites such as remoteok, or look on LinkedIn but it seems that those are mostly full of ghost offers...
Does it all happen through personal network nowadays?49 votes -
Income tax will be dead within five years as AI jobs crisis grows, says Monzo founder
10 votes -
Software job openings surge this year, defying AI fears
29 votes -
What if AI just makes us work harder?
40 votes -
A survey of 1,000 hiring managers found that 59% say they emphasize AI’s role in layoffs because it is viewed more favorably than saying layoffs or hiring freezes
42 votes -
Meta’s AI smart glasses and data privacy concerns: workers say “we see everything”
37 votes -
The AI disruption has arrived, and it sure is fun
29 votes -
South Korea seeks multilingual talent to hunt down K-content piracy
15 votes -
AI fails at 96% of jobs (new study)
28 votes -
Finland opens Europe's first lithium mine – will create about 350 jobs and offers Europe's only production chain of its kind, reducing reliance on Chinese imports
15 votes -
The AI vampire
27 votes -
‘So tired I want to cry’: AI promotional giveaways swamp shops in China
13 votes -
AI doesn’t reduce work—it intensifies it
41 votes -
AI hallucination cases - When lawyers use hallucinated legal content
25 votes -
Alphabet plots big expansion in India as US restricts visas
20 votes -
Will your AI teammate bring bagels to standup?
19 votes -
I no longer trust the stats that companies publish on the gender equality in their tech roles
I am really not sure if this topic belongs in ~tech or ~society or ~talk but I trust the moderators to re-assign accordingly. So, this is the layout of the "development" team of my companies....
I am really not sure if this topic belongs in ~tech or ~society or ~talk but I trust the moderators to re-assign accordingly.
So, this is the layout of the "development" team of my companies.
there are 4 "development" teams which reports to the development manager who also occasionally codes.
There is one team, that's the one I am on. 7 people, 6 males.
there is another team, 4 people, 3 males.
there is another team, 5 people, 4 males.
The last team, I don't really consider "development" team. its a team of 4 females. What they are best suited for is QA in the sense of manually testing the product to ensure the experience is sufficient for push to PROD, But because of budget restrictions, they are being forced to learn code and testing suites so they can be the people to develop our testing structure. They are great people and excellent Manual QAers but they really are not developers.All our tech managers and team leads are men with the exception of the team lead for QA (obviously).
And just to be clear, the culture is friendly and respectful and no complaints. It's just the gender ratio is pathetic.
So our tech gender ratio is really 17 people and 3 women which is 17%.
If you want to consider the QA team a dev team to bump up the numbers, you get 21 with 7, that's still only 33%.At a recent company meeting, they were talking about how diverse our workforce is and blah blah blah (I tune out most of that stuff as we are fully remote and I spend most of my time coding), but then they showed a slide that claimed our gender ratio for tech roles was like 50% or something.....
I message a colleague at work, being like "where on earth did they get that number??", he was like ":shrug: maybe they are counting the people who use the product we are making?"
To clarify that, the product we work on is rarely used by external customers. Instead we have employees who know how to use our product and correspond on our behalf with external customers. So all these employees are doing is using a webapp the real tech employees develop.
So long story short, my company pulled a number out of nowhere to claim we have gender equity in the tech roles and now I dont know how to trust any stats a company puts out about how equal the gender roles are in their "tech" departments.
31 votes -
YouTube is awful. Please use YouTube, though.
45 votes -
AI might not be coming for lawyers’ jobs anytime soon
7 votes -
How to get found by recruiters on LinkedIn
30 votes -
Anthropic to bring its AI to hundreds of teachers in Iceland with pilot scheme – aim of helping them with lesson planning, classroom materials, and administrative work
7 votes -
How do I convince my workplace we need SQL databases?
I work for a GIS company and our tools have not grown with our projects and client base. We use ArcPro personal geo databases (GDBs) for ALL data. We recently had a project where shit really hit...
I work for a GIS company and our tools have not grown with our projects and client base. We use ArcPro personal geo databases (GDBs) for ALL data. We recently had a project where shit really hit the fan, one major issue was related to invalid values from poor version control. Everything uses personal GDBs and is just "version controlled" by dating filenames in Explorer. It would have been trivial to fix in a proper database. We also have operational constraints, like we can only have one person doing X job at a time since all the data for X job is in a personal GDB.
But I'm just an analyst. I've garnered some attention for my technical expertise beyond processing the data. PostGIS is a thing so it isn't as though we'd be recreating the wheel. How can I push for that sort of change? I'm thinking I can sell it using how much we lost on this project because of these avoidable failures. I'm also wondering if I can make this an opportunity to create a "database administrator" position for myself
29 votes -
What happens when the internet goes out at your work?
Can you pivot to other tasks, or are you dead in the water? What about others? Your team/department? Tell us what its like for those minutes/hours. How often does the internet drop for you (if at...
Can you pivot to other tasks, or are you dead in the water? What about others? Your team/department? Tell us what its like for those minutes/hours.
How often does the internet drop for you (if at all)?
If you don't ever lose internet at work (lucky you!), answer hypothetically about what would happen.
35 votes -
California attorney fined for using twenty-one AI hallucinated cases in court filing
53 votes -
The evidence that AI is destroying jobs for young people just got stronger
35 votes -
Refusing LinkedIn's ID verification is costing me my job
A long, complicated story, summarized: (apart from Tildes, on which I lurk) I swore off all social media years ago. Then my job required that I have an account on LinkedIn. I reconsidered, and...
A long, complicated story, summarized: (apart from Tildes, on which I lurk) I swore off all social media years ago. Then my job required that I have an account on LinkedIn. I reconsidered, and attempted to make the least disclosive account possible in an effort to protect my privacy. Things aren't going well. Despite logging in with the correct credentials, on the same device, using the same browser; and with access to my signup email, and access to the phone I used to enroll, LinkedIn has flagged my account the second time I tried using it and now requires me to upload images of myself and my government ID to regain access to their cesspool. Are you familiar with their protocols and can share insights, so that if I start again I don't face the same problem?
I have read what LinkedIn says and I have read discussions on Reddit on the topic. LinkedIn says you can opt to "use your work email" or mail them an affidavit. These options were not given to me. Everyone else I have seen reporting facing this seems to have triggered the system by losing their login credentials or moving countries; what brought this upon me and can I avoid it?
- Is it that I use a VPN, and it may have routed through a different IP address on the second login?
- I use an email alias. Is LinkedIn purging accounts with email domains that offer aliases?
- Is it a result of clearing cookies?
- Is it easier to maintain a Google account (!) which LinkedIn allows as login without this ID thing coming up?
Please be gentle with your advice as I am kind of panicking.
54 votes -
The enterprise experience
33 votes -
None of this is real and it doesn’t matter
36 votes -
Open AI announces $1.5 million bonus for every employee
22 votes