Cellphone review: Umidigi F2
I was recently in the market for a cheap used phone. I was looking for an Android device, preferably less than 3 years old, preferably with an unlockable bootloader and rootable, for $200 or less. I was looking at used Pixel 2's when I came across this weird Chinese manufacturer I'd never heard of.
The Umidigi F2 is a bizarre device. I was blown away by the specs, and the seller was only asking $200CAD for it, so I took a chance. I've got to say, so far I'm pretty impressed.
Quick Specs:
- 6.5" IPS LCD, 2340x1080px, bezelless, w/ hole-punch camera, no notch
- 6GB Dual-channel LPDDR4 RAM, 128GB Storage
- Mediatek P70 - ARM Cortex A73/A53 Octo-core 2.0/2.1GHz CPU
- 5 cameras, 32MP front-facing, 48MP rear, 13MP wide-angle, 5MP depth, 5MP macro
- Dual SIM, MicroSD
- 5150mAh battery
- ~40 frequency bands
- 3.5mm headphone jack
- Stock Android 10
At this price I was initially skeptical. There must be something wrong with it, some glaring flaw I wasn't seeing, and/or those specs must be fake. I'm happy to say though, they're real, and the device seems much more solid than I expected.
I've had the thing a little over a week so far, and have only charged it once. On the first charge it lasted 4 days before I charged it, and still had 30% battery remaining after I'd spent a couple hours surfing the web and two hours watching youtube (total screen-on time was ~4.5hrs). After charging it I haven't been using it as much, but it's currently been running 3 days and it has 70% battery remaining. I've used it to listen to the radio for 3 hours this morning. Oh yeah, did I mention? Bizarrely, it has a FM radio tuner for some reason.
So far everything has been smooth, the device performs really well, which is not something I expected from a Mediatek CPU. Rooting it went smoothly, and I've been able to tweak a bunch of settings via the EdXposed framework, as much as you can in Android 10 anyway. I did remove some background bloat, but otherwise the default ROM is very close to vanilla AOSP.
The build quality of the thing is honestly not bad. I've used mid-range Samsung devices that have felt cheaper and more plastic-y than this. I have read some reports of bad touchscreens, but so far I haven't had any problems. There's also a DIY solution to solve that. Unfortunately, if it dies, this is pretty much my only option, since the warranty and support is pretty much nonexistent. At a quarter the price of a brand-name phone with similar specs though, I'm willing to roll those dice.
So, other than warranty, what are the downsides? Well, so far the biggest gripe I have is there is no notification LED on it. So if I go to the washroom and come back I can't just tell at a glance if I've missed a call or text, I actually need to unlock it. Luckily the fingerprint reader and face unlock are both pretty reliable. There is no wireless charging, which I'm more or less okay with. The main reason I'd want that is if the USB port died, but again, this is the sort of phone that if anything is wrong with it you're pretty much meant to throw it out. The speaker is a bit tinny, and unfortunately it's mono. The cameras are bad. The 48MP camera does take 8000x6000 pictures, but they're grainy to the point where even if you resize them down they still look worse than something taken with a good 6MP camera. This seems to be a software problem though. The camera module is apparently made by Samsung, and people have said it's gotten better with every OTA update. As for that, there's been an update this month, but a lot of people are expecting it might be the last update they put out. Umidigi apparently has a bad track record of only providing updates for a few months.
In conclusion, this is objectively a decent phone, and for it's price, it's exceptional. You sacrifice warranty, updates, any kind of support really, but you get some very decent hardware for $200.
Official site: https://www.umidigi.com/page-umidigi_f2_specification.html
Purchasable on amazon for fast shipping, purchase on aliexpress to save $50.
This came at a pretty convenient time for me, was trying to do some research into this phone currently. Been trying to replace my phone ,a Axon 7, with something that has band71 support, and it seems like only flagships have support for it along with this random chinese phone.
Ultimately I'm probably not gonna pick it up just because of the cpu. When I did research it seems it gets worse geekbench 5 scores than my current phone even though it is 4 years newer. Just hard for me to stomach buying a new phone that technically does things worse than my old phone.
Mediatek is definitely not a great SOC maker. Reviews I've seen for the performance of this thing always factor the price into their review, comparing it to entry-level devices. They say it's a lot faster than similar priced phones, but has about half the performance of a modern flagship.
I don't have any modern phone to compare it against, but it seems fast enough to me. Out of curiosity I downloaded geekbench 5, and got a score of 312 single core, 1449 multicore. That puts it in the range of a Galaxy S8+ or so. Admittedly not fantastic.
Bit better than the reviews of the cpu I've read. Current phone has a Snapdragon 820 and gets 320 single core and 778 multi-core. I like the multi-core and wouldn't have an issue with it. But I just expect an increase in single core also after all these years.
Not awful for a MTK chip though.
Plus for me it's nice to buy any phone that isn't using Qualcomm inside, because screw their monopolistic practices.
If I didn't have a Pixel 3a that works great, I'd definitely have my eyes on this.
Are you at all worried about spyware or anything like that being installed on it?
I’d be concerned that for $200 it was full of stuff like that and they’d sell your data. Sort of like lower end TVs.
A bit.
The debloat guide I followed has a few apps that may or may not be spyware. The guy who wrote this seems fairly paranoid and is pretty heavy-handed with what they recommend uninstalling.
From all the stuff that's installed, anything
com.mediatek
is made by the CPU's manufacturer, and anythingcom.freeme
is made by the device's ODM, Droi.A few of these are suspect, and I've removed them. For example:
However, there's not a lot of apps at all from the manufacturer. Most of the things in this list are included in vanilla android, like:
I've removed most of the stuff on this list. I'm not sure if they could have installed anything in the /sys/ partition running in such a way Android doesn't see it, but the device is in fact certified by google, so idk if that would be something they look for.
Also, A firewall like AFWall+ should help as well, right?
(whitelist network access to only apps/services you trust).
I do this on a Pixel device as well, (anecdotal) and def notice improved battery life with curbing how many apps can actually connect to the internet (via wifi or mobile)
That's definitely not a bad idea, and I think I might just do that. I was also thinking about running wireshark on my network and sniffing to see if it phones home to anywhere sketchy, but I'm not sure I'm that concerned. The default install of android on these things is very close to stock. The lack of effort these guys put into updating software or customizing their install makes me think they don't have the resources to install anything nefarious.
I'd be a lot more concerned about Xiaomi, ZTE, or especially Huawei devices, where they have lots of software people to design custom spying apps, and they're big enough the PRC notices them and asks them to install theirs. Huawei devices without google's apps or stamp of approval seem especially sketchy, since no one outside of China has seen or approved of the software they're installing.
Update: 31/2 days after writing this and I'm still on the same charge. The battery in this thing is absurd. It's now been running over a week without charging, and I'm still at 33%. It says I still have 3 days remaining.
https://i.imgur.com/CPuO7X8.png