In short, we need to keep E2EE [(end-to-end encryption)] as it is so that it benefits the 99.9% of people who are good actors. If we enforce backdoors and undermine it, then the bad 0.1% percent simply will switch to non-backdoored systems while the 99.9% are left vulnerable.
It seems to me that the pro-E2EE side keeps pointing out that the "backdoor" solution is fundamentally flawed ... while the backdoor proponents keep utterly ignoring this argument. I have yet to...
It seems to me that the pro-E2EE side keeps pointing out that the "backdoor" solution is fundamentally flawed ... while the backdoor proponents keep utterly ignoring this argument.
I have yet to see any "backdoor" defense that even acknowledges the problem, let alone tries to address it. They just keep on eternally saying "must stop terrorism (or whatever) at any cost".
It seems worth doing the experiment and may help for some problems, but a flaw is that users themselves willingly spread whatever memes they have a weakness for. Maybe the reputation system will...
It seems worth doing the experiment and may help for some problems, but a flaw is that users themselves willingly spread whatever memes they have a weakness for. Maybe the reputation system will help them find the “good stuff” (abhorrent crap) and spread it around faster?
Pardon my ignorance, but this looks just like a longer version of ban list? Trolls would just create more accounts and use them as throwaways. Or what if a user is wrongly banned? Is there any...
Pardon my ignorance, but this looks just like a longer version of ban list?
Trolls would just create more accounts and use them as throwaways.
Or what if a user is wrongly banned? Is there any appeal process?
To me it sounds like an excuse to implement a feature that they want. I'm not against it or anything, but I fail to see how such feature would help with the starting issue that they use in the...
To me it sounds like an excuse to implement a feature that they want. I'm not against it or anything, but I fail to see how such feature would help with the starting issue that they use in the argument.
Well done Matrix.
It seems to me that the pro-E2EE side keeps pointing out that the "backdoor" solution is fundamentally flawed ... while the backdoor proponents keep utterly ignoring this argument.
I have yet to see any "backdoor" defense that even acknowledges the problem, let alone tries to address it. They just keep on eternally saying "must stop terrorism (or whatever) at any cost".
It seems worth doing the experiment and may help for some problems, but a flaw is that users themselves willingly spread whatever memes they have a weakness for. Maybe the reputation system will help them find the “good stuff” (abhorrent crap) and spread it around faster?
Pardon my ignorance, but this looks just like a longer version of ban list?
Trolls would just create more accounts and use them as throwaways.
Or what if a user is wrongly banned? Is there any appeal process?
To me it sounds like an excuse to implement a feature that they want. I'm not against it or anything, but I fail to see how such feature would help with the starting issue that they use in the argument.