-
10 votes
-
Signal messenger releases 'usernames' so you no longer need to tell someone your phone number in order for them to message you
59 votes -
Online anonymity: study found ‘stable pseudonyms’ created a more civil environment than real user names
68 votes -
The decline of username and password on the same page
Web devs: what's up with this trend? For enterprise apps, I get it…single sign-on needs to detect what your email domain is to send you to your identity provider. For consumers, I feel like it's...
Web devs: what's up with this trend? For enterprise apps, I get it…single sign-on needs to detect what your email domain is to send you to your identity provider. For consumers, I feel like it's gotta be one of these reasons:
- Users don't know about the tab key being able to move to other fields on a page
- Mobile users don't really have a tab key, despite there being "previous/next field" arrows on the stock iOS keyboard since its inception (Android users, help me out please)
- Users tend to hit Enter after typing in their username, leading to a form submission with a blank password
- Security, maybe? In the past I have sent a link and a password in separate emails or separate communication methods entirely. Are you hashing/salting these separately for better MITM mitigation?
Did your UX team make a decision? Are my password managers forever doomed to need a "keyboard combo" value for every entry from now on?
Non-devs: do you prefer one method over the other? If so, why?
Tildes maintainers: selfishly, thanks for keeping these together :)
71 votes -
No more phone number swaps: Signal messaging app now testing usernames
46 votes -
Do you go by a pseudonym or your real name (or both) for your online presence?
Further questions: If you go by both, do you ever mix them or do you keep them totally separate? Do you let your real life friends, family and peers know about your online pseudonyms? For people...
Further questions:
- If you go by both, do you ever mix them or do you keep them totally separate?
- Do you let your real life friends, family and peers know about your online pseudonyms?
- For people building an online presence as a kind of brand, how does this impact your choice?
58 votes -
All Discord users will need to choose new username
19 votes -
Telegram is auctioning off rare usernames on the TON blockchain
4 votes -
Plex breach exposes usernames, emails, and encrypted passwords
12 votes -
If you could rebuild user authentication on the web from the ground up, what would you do?
lou's post here resonated with me and my attempts to get my family to use better security practices (i.e. 2FA, password managers). They're very difficult to wrap your brain around to the average...
lou's post here resonated with me and my attempts to get my family to use better security practices (i.e. 2FA, password managers). They're very difficult to wrap your brain around to the average user, and they have the ability to create catastrophic failstates if used incorrectly. Furthermore, even when they work well, they can still be kind of clunky (different sites use different methods; writing down/printing recovery codes feels like a dated solution alongside other tech-forward things).
Also, outside of this, password requirements are their own bugbear, with nearly every site having different criteria. Even as someone who uses a password generator and manager on the regular, I still have to adjust the password creation criteria to do things like fit character limits or specific requirements (and don't get me started on forced resets!). I totally get why so many people reuse passwords, or have a default one that they sort of modify as needed to fit a given site's needs.
From my (admittedly super limited) perspective of a lay user: usernames, passwords, 2FA and the whole stack seems like something that's suffering under the technical debt of decades' worth of web development and networking. It seems like things have inched forward and many new layers have been added to address emergent problems, but the whole system gives a sort of barely-held-together-by-tape feel.
What if we could use what we know now and redesign things from the ground up? If we could start fresh, today, what might username authentication look like beyond the usual username/password combos that we're so used to?
I'm interested in any ideas -- not necessarily just feasible ones.
Also, despite me being the one prompting this thread, don't feel the need to simplify technical explanations or anything. I'm mostly interested in lurking and seeing what all you very smart techy people have to say about the topic. :)
12 votes -
Name don'ts
14 votes -
Company made to change name that could be used for XSS vulnerabilities
11 votes -
Server names: One of the remaining places where IT managers can be a little silly
20 votes