-
34 votes
-
Anna's Archive ISBN visualization contest winners
20 votes -
What happened to user interfaces?
23 votes -
Kagi recently changed their dark mode, fix inside
Since I know quite a few tilderinos use Kagi (far higher percentage than the standard population) I figured this might interest some of you. Kagi pushed out a new Dark theme that is not dark. It's...
Since I know quite a few tilderinos use Kagi (far higher percentage than the standard population) I figured this might interest some of you.
Kagi pushed out a new Dark theme that is not dark. It's possibly even worse than Googles non-dark official Dark mode.
Here is a CSS fix you can throw in your custom css section in settings that I whipped up for some people in the Discord, should be useful.
:root { --custom-bg-color: #090c10; --search-result-gap: 20px; --search-result-gap-mobile: 10px; --app-bg: var(--custom-bg-color); --search-result-title: #fff; --primary-visited: #aaa; /*! --quick-search-bg: #000; */ --color-search-input: var(--custom-bg-color); --result-item-title-border: rgba(255,255,255,0.25); --search-result-date-bg: rgba(255,255,255,0.15); } .__sri-time { font-size: 12px; border-radius: 2px; margin-right: 3px } .__sri-desc { padding-top: 3px; } .__sri-title { margin-bottom: 5px; } .__sri-url .__sri_url_path_box { margin-top: 0px; } @media screen and (max-width: 1300px) { .search-result, .sri-group { padding-top: 0px !important; padding-bottom: 0px !important; margin-bottom: var(--search-result-gap-mobile) !important; } }
This fixes the colors, padding, and some other general weirdness they introduced. They also don't follow their own variable specs so I introduced two new ones in there so you can modify to your liking (namely padding between links on mobile and desktop).
26 votes -
Just use QWERTY! ("my plea to anyone who has to display a virtual on-screen keyboard")
35 votes -
Why does it seem that FOSS users don't value user-friendliness very much?
The vast majority of free and open source software available is well known for being clunky, having very unintuitive UI/UX and being very inaccessible to non-nerds. We can see this in Linux...
The vast majority of free and open source software available is well known for being clunky, having very unintuitive UI/UX and being very inaccessible to non-nerds.
We can see this in Linux distros, tools, programs and even fediverse sites.
I understand that a lot of it is because "it's free", but I also feel like a lot of people who make and use FOSS don't actually value user-friendliness at all. I feel like some of it is in order to gatekeep the less tech savvy out, and some of it is "it's good enough for me".
What are the best theories for why this is the case?
EDIT: A lot of replies I've been getting are focusing on the developers. I'm asking more why the users seem okay with it, rather than why the developers make it that way.
67 votes -
Evolution of the scrollbar
23 votes