18
votes
Lars Aagaard, Danish climate minister, says farmers deserving most success on the European market should be those who emit the least carbon per tonne of food produced
Link information
This data is scraped automatically and may be incorrect.
- Title
- EU farmers should pay for their carbon emissions, says Denmark
- Word count
- 39 words
Sounds great on paper, we should tackle emissions on all fronts. However, this will probably raise the already rising cost of food to consumers.
Also does this take into account just plain bad year in farming when the harvest is smaller than expected?
What about differences in climates? Italy has an easier time growing all kinds of vegetables than Northern Europe but it seems like a bad deal for Northern Europe to be totally dependent on other countries, they're all independent after all.
Also, this could just encourage importing food outside of Europe, which probably isn't ideal either.
(If someone's up to correcting my grammar, I welcome the pm.)
I also worry about other externalities. Carbon emissions are far from the only issue with modern farming. Fertilizer/pesticide/herbicide consumption and runoff needs to be considered too, at the very least. If optimizing for carbon emissions increases those other metrics, that's not necessarily a net positive.
Yeah, this sounds very good at first glance but could totally ruin incentives and/or prices, and thus demand, for organic food, unfortunately.
My first thought is: does the current system care about these differences you mention? I think the answer is that different climates suit different crops, and this would further incentivize the growth of crops appropriate to the region. And that is a good thing.
Mirror, for those hit by the paywall:
https://archive.is/caWj4