This is a great law. Hopefully they enforce it heavily and with fines as large as humanly possible. Because it’s Fast Company, they have to include the pro-business side of things and make it...
This is a great law. Hopefully they enforce it heavily and with fines as large as humanly possible.
Because it’s Fast Company, they have to include the pro-business side of things and make it sound like it really isn’t a problem…
Many ghost jobs are the result of poor oversight, such as when a third-party platform posts a job that is no longer open, or does not take it down in time.
Okay, where’s the proof of that? That’s just speculating. That’s followed immediately by:
A recent analysis of over 175,000 job listings revealed that about one in seven jobs was active for more than 30 days, at which point a company may no longer be reviewing applications.
That’s just an unrelated stat. It doesn’t backup the claim at all. There’s no causal link or anything.
I agree with the law too but also hate misleading or arbitrary statistics. I've certainly struggled filling certain positions in the last couple years. Mostly specialized senior roles where...
I agree with the law too but also hate misleading or arbitrary statistics.
I've certainly struggled filling certain positions in the last couple years. Mostly specialized senior roles where certain experience is required, else it makes more sense to outsource until we can find the right person. In those cases 30 days doesn't mean much.
I agree that 30 days may be a helpful line for less demanding, or entry/mid career roles but they're not controlling for anything like that.
This is a step in the right direction, but like the salary range law, how useful and effective can it be? I'd like to see strictly regulated job boards run by states. They'd be able to more...
This is a step in the right direction, but like the salary range law, how useful and effective can it be?
I'd like to see strictly regulated job boards run by states. They'd be able to more effectively enforce these regulations/laws, verify companies and hiring individuals/headhunters, and ban repeat bad actors when fines are not a sufficient deterrent. They could tie into unemployment programs requesting evidence of job hunting. I'm sure there's more I haven't considered.
Does anyone know of a government with such a system in place, if so, how effective is it? Is it usurped by unregulated options?
This is a great law. Hopefully they enforce it heavily and with fines as large as humanly possible.
Because it’s Fast Company, they have to include the pro-business side of things and make it sound like it really isn’t a problem…
Okay, where’s the proof of that? That’s just speculating. That’s followed immediately by:
That’s just an unrelated stat. It doesn’t backup the claim at all. There’s no causal link or anything.
I agree with the law too but also hate misleading or arbitrary statistics.
I've certainly struggled filling certain positions in the last couple years. Mostly specialized senior roles where certain experience is required, else it makes more sense to outsource until we can find the right person. In those cases 30 days doesn't mean much.
I agree that 30 days may be a helpful line for less demanding, or entry/mid career roles but they're not controlling for anything like that.
This is a step in the right direction, but like the salary range law, how useful and effective can it be?
I'd like to see strictly regulated job boards run by states. They'd be able to more effectively enforce these regulations/laws, verify companies and hiring individuals/headhunters, and ban repeat bad actors when fines are not a sufficient deterrent. They could tie into unemployment programs requesting evidence of job hunting. I'm sure there's more I haven't considered.
Does anyone know of a government with such a system in place, if so, how effective is it? Is it usurped by unregulated options?