-
30 votes
-
US Department of Homeland Security terminates all advisory boards, halts all investigations
41 votes -
Some US corporations like Costco and Microsoft are resisting Donald Trump's push to end diversity hiring intiatives
39 votes -
Did Donald Trump's executive order just make everyone in the US female?
39 votes -
US President Donald Trump tells Vladimir Putin to end 'ridiculous war' in Ukraine or face new sanctions
20 votes -
New York Governor Kathy Hochul proposes locking the door on corporate housing rollups
15 votes -
US President Donald Trump to make historic move towards revoking birthright citizenship
31 votes -
Joe Biden says Equal Rights Amendment is ratified, but US Supreme Court gets final say
23 votes -
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith puts petroleum over country
14 votes -
The US Senate is considering the Laken Riley Act. Here's what it would do if fully implemented and upheld by the courts.
18 votes -
Ohio woman sues hospital, medical staff, city, and police after being arrested for miscarriage
37 votes -
Spain plans 100% tax for homes bought by non-EU residents
18 votes -
More than a dozen US states have passed new laws that led to restrictions on pornography. Now, the Supreme Court will weigh in.
26 votes -
Abortion bans seem to be driving young people to move out of state
27 votes -
Iceland's youngest-ever prime minister Kristrún Frostadóttir, who entered politics just four years ago, talks about feminism, the far right and reopening talks on joining the EU
13 votes -
Greece to ban thousands of Airbnb accommodations with new regulations
20 votes -
Norway plans to reintroduce an obligation to build bomb shelters in new buildings, a practice halted in 1998
8 votes -
Is America going to abandon its towns falling into the ocean?
23 votes -
Europe, on the brink, faces a pileup of threats for 2025
10 votes -
Berkeley's evolution on housing
5 votes -
While a potential US acquisition of Greenland looks unlikely there are compelling reasons why this would be of benefit to the West's security
12 votes -
Iceland's incoming government will put EU membership to referendum by 2027 – 2008 financial crisis, Brexit and a range of domestic issues has meant country is slowly warming to the idea
13 votes -
US federal anti-hazing legislation to impose new reporting obligations on colleges and universities
12 votes -
Danish government has announced a huge boost in defence spending for Greenland – defence minister Troels Lund Poulsen said the package was at least $1.5bn
17 votes -
Wondering if there is a good discussion or debate on if issues affecting under-privileged folks should be more racially based or socioeconomic based?
basically, there seem to be 2 competing narratives of "people of color/poor people of all color tend to have it worse so let's create social programs specifically targeting them to left them up"...
basically, there seem to be 2 competing narratives of "people of color/poor people of all color tend to have it worse so let's create social programs specifically targeting them to left them up"
and I am see pros and cons to both sides and am wondering what people well-researched and versed on either have to say to each other.
- I really prefer to see a long-form discussion but I am not opposed to a debate as long as its a debate with no audience. I've really grown to hate watching debate participants try to argue for claps or score cheap points with the audience.
- Very minimal shouting or yelling over each other and each side lets the other finish.
- I prefer if its not "dark web" folks like Sam Harris or Coleman Hughes who are involved in discussion but am not totally opposed.
An example of a debate I kinda liked (would have liked it more if Fridman hadn't invited a streamer and treated it like he had the same level of expertise as historians or analyst): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1X_KdkoGxSs
12 votes -
US anti-abortion officials from red states continue deputizing angry men to turn over their partners in new legal tactic
25 votes -
US government report - The cost of anticompetitive pricing algorithms in rental housing
21 votes -
Bold solutions to end the homelessness crisis
19 votes -
Why US health insurance reform is difficult
15 votes -
Norway is assessing its EU options as a second Donald Trump term looms – increased geopolitical tensions could yet see Oslo rethink its attitude towards Brussels
12 votes -
US state courts will also have a strong impact on Donald Trump's plans through their authority over state officials and residents
6 votes -
US Senator Elizabeth Warren pushes bill to make it easier and cheaper to file for bankruptcy
11 votes -
Elon Musk is wrong about the F-35
6 votes -
A manifesto against for-profit US health insurance companies — by Michael Moore
38 votes -
Inside the MAGA plot to write birthright citizenship out of the US constitution
24 votes -
Finland will review whether to reintroduce antipersonnel land mines for improved defenses against Russia on the NATO defense bloc's longest land border with its main adversary
24 votes -
Latest chat control proposal was voted down but only just
13 votes -
40% of new Netherlands housing construction halted by two-thirds affordable requirement
18 votes -
Why US Democrats got the politics of immigration so wrong for so long
20 votes -
UC Berkeley scholar discusses higher education under US President-Elect Donald Trump's government
4 votes -
Policy Window: A surprising lack of discussions regarding healthcare policy reform
Rather than rehash all the conversations about the identity or motive of the person who killed the United Healthcare CEO, I'd love to have a discussion about the policy window it seems to have...
Rather than rehash all the conversations about the identity or motive of the person who killed the United Healthcare CEO, I'd love to have a discussion about the policy window it seems to have opened. This is the first time we've seen widespread, bi-partisan support for an issue - seemingly medicare for all - but I can't find anyone actually talking about policy. None of the big legacy media organizations like BBC or CNN, or your typical cast of medicare for all characters like Bernie Sanders. I'm not sure if silence on the topic to insulate folks from being labelled "cold or heartless", but it seems like systematic issues with the insurance industry is at the core of what has everyone so riled up. Am I missing some large scale discussion happening that is actually focusing on regulatory change or is it just not happening?
Maybe to the heart of the question for those better informed than myself: What can we do from a grassroots perspective to push for regulatory reform while this is still fresh in the public eye? There seems to be momentum, can it be funneled into something meaningful?
I realize the threads I've seen on the topic have been locked, so if you participate in the discussion please keep this policy related. We all have strong feeling about what happened, but as much as we can let's stay on topic.
16 votes -
Public housing in the US was set up to fail but public funds still provide housing for a couple million people
14 votes -
Chat control is back on agenda, again
17 votes -
China bans export of critical minerals to US as trade tensions escalate
30 votes -
'Bodies are piling up': Reporter finds some states are hiding abortion ban death toll
40 votes -
Wall Street is banking on US President-Elect Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown
11 votes -
What really happened after California raised its minimum wage to $20 for fast food workers
21 votes -
Norwegian Parliament votes to extend abortion access to eighteen weeks into a pregnancy, adding six weeks to a limit set in 1978 when the procedure was first legalized
9 votes -
Towards a new nuclear arms race? Vladimir Putin, the breakdown of nuclear treaty limits and MIRVs.
13 votes -
Amphibious warfare center set up in Norway in the latest move by a NATO member to beef up its operations on Russia's Arctic doorstep
6 votes