9 votes

NFL - Instant Replay for Pass Interference

12 comments

  1. [6]
    alyaza
    Link
    unfortunate, because this would have been extremely funny to see this in action in something a little bit larger than the AAF.

    Defeated: Onside kick alternative
    A proposal from the Denver Broncos would have given teams a one-time opportunity in the fourth quarter to swap a kickoff for a fourth-and-15 play attempt at the 35-yard line. Convert and keep the ball. Don't convert and turn it over. In essence, it would have served as an alternative to the onside kick, an attractive option considering the new difficulty in recovering them. But the proposal was not met with much support. New York Giants co-owner John Mara quipped to reporters, "What are we, the Arena League?"

    unfortunate, because this would have been extremely funny to see this in action in something a little bit larger than the AAF.

    4 votes
    1. [4]
      asep
      Link Parent
      I'm not very well versed in american football so can you explain why this is illegal now. As far as my knowledge of the rules go, you're allowed to do whatever play you want with the ball right?...

      I'm not very well versed in american football so can you explain why this is illegal now. As far as my knowledge of the rules go, you're allowed to do whatever play you want with the ball right? What changes when you're on your fourth down or when you're inside the 35 yard as of right now.

      1 vote
      1. [2]
        AnthonyB
        Link Parent
        This is, or was, a proposed rule change to the kickoff, which takes place at the opening of the first and third quarters and after a team scores. During the kickoff, once the ball travels ten...

        This is, or was, a proposed rule change to the kickoff, which takes place at the opening of the first and third quarters and after a team scores. During the kickoff, once the ball travels ten yards, the kicking team can recover the ball and keep possession. An onside kick is a play designed specifically for the kicking team to recover the ball. This almost always takes place at the end of the game when the kicking team is losing and does not have time to stop the opposing offense (but on rare occasions it will happen at a random point - the most famous example being the New Orleans Saits' successful onside kick to start the third quarter of the 2010 Super Bowl). It has always been a very difficult play, but recent saftey changes to the rules have made it almost impossible.

        I believe you are confusing this with a punt, which a team can elect to do at any point when they have posession of the ball. A punt will usually take place on fourth down when the team is outside scoring range and doesn't want to risk giving the opponent good field position.

        Hope that helps!

        5 votes
        1. asep
          Link Parent
          Yes! You're right I did in fact have it confused with a punt, thanks for clearing it up.

          Yes! You're right I did in fact have it confused with a punt, thanks for clearing it up.

          1 vote
      2. [2]
        Comment deleted by author
        Link Parent
        1. asep
          Link Parent
          I see, thanks for clearing that. As a rugby player myself it's actually very interesting to see how even if they're very different sports some strategies remain the same. For example just last...

          I see, thanks for clearing that. As a rugby player myself it's actually very interesting to see how even if they're very different sports some strategies remain the same. For example just last weekend my team tried an onside kick (mainly because the other team had poor fitness though).

          1 vote
    2. insegnamante
      Link Parent
      Yeah, I would have liked to see this, too. It will probably become a rule eventully.

      Yeah, I would have liked to see this, too. It will probably become a rule eventully.

  2. [2]
    insegnamante
    Link
    There are also a number of other changes to the rules, including making the new kickoff rules permanent and not allowing blindside blocks.

    There are also a number of other changes to the rules, including making the new kickoff rules permanent and not allowing blindside blocks.

    3 votes
    1. Cosmos
      Link Parent
      Still no fix to the stupid overtime rules though. Why is it so hard for them to simply adopt the NCAA overtime? It is superior in every conceivable way.

      Still no fix to the stupid overtime rules though. Why is it so hard for them to simply adopt the NCAA overtime? It is superior in every conceivable way.

      3 votes
  3. [3]
    AnthonyB
    Link
    Finally! Hopefully this will expand to other penalties in the future. The rule changes over the past 5-10 years gave so much more pressure and responsibility to the officials that it felt like...

    Finally! Hopefully this will expand to other penalties in the future. The rule changes over the past 5-10 years gave so much more pressure and responsibility to the officials that it felt like they had as much influence on the outcome as an NBA official does in basketball.

    Somewhat unrelated, but I really hope they make significant changes to illegal contact rules in the future. Long live the defensive struggle!

    3 votes
    1. [3]
      Comment deleted by author
      Link Parent
      1. [2]
        frickindeal
        Link Parent
        The point is to avoid and be able to correct obvious mistakes, which have and still do happen. Refs are human and the game at field level happens extremely fast.

        The point is to avoid and be able to correct obvious mistakes, which have and still do happen. Refs are human and the game at field level happens extremely fast.

        1. [2]
          Comment deleted by author
          Link Parent
          1. frickindeal
            Link Parent
            I'm not saying I agree with it, but it's purely reactionary. A 'bad' call changes the outcome of an important game, and they change the rule to allow more scrutiny of the play after the fact. Of...

            I'm not saying I agree with it, but it's purely reactionary. A 'bad' call changes the outcome of an important game, and they change the rule to allow more scrutiny of the play after the fact. Of course 'bad' is subjective, but you have to have rules to have a sport. The NFL uses a team in NY to review critical plays, so it's not up to one person; instead a consensus is reached.

  4. gtwillwin
    Link
    I think this is a really good rule change but with the downside of making cornerback an even harder position to play. I guess a lot of it will come down to how the application of replay on DPI is...

    I think this is a really good rule change but with the downside of making cornerback an even harder position to play. I guess a lot of it will come down to how the application of replay on DPI is applied but there's no way this isn't going to make defending receivers even harder than it already is.

    1 vote