It'll certainly help with the issue of people not knowing that they're giving away a ton of information. On the other hand, people are more and more willing to give away their information for...
It'll certainly help with the issue of people not knowing that they're giving away a ton of information.
On the other hand, people are more and more willing to give away their information for corporate perks: like your typical customer club program.
People want those programs, they ask for them. People are more than willing to give away plenty of personal information to save money.
GDPR gets at those who don't know what they're doing, but the latest statistics from my country at least, show that the younger people are, the more information they're willing to give away. A majority of the under-21s even say they're comfortable with "people selling ads to you based on your inferred sexual preferences"
being refused a job because you're <random discriminating attribute found out on your profile> ( though no one will really admit to it due to most laws prohibiting that kind of stuff ) insurances...
being refused a job because you're <random discriminating attribute found out on your profile> ( though no one will really admit to it due to most laws prohibiting that kind of stuff )
insurances increasing your premium because <random search on your favorite medical internet board>
higher airplane tickets <because you already searched for them, because you already went there>
selling you more and more "comfort" stuff that you don't really need but ads trick your brain into wanting them ( the whole targeted ads are what you want not what you need, at least with non-targeted ads you don't "want" a lot of it )
interestingly, I can't seem to be able to edit that post ^, keeping it as-is for now in case it's worth debugging it :D here is the same without broken tags: being refused a job because you're...
interestingly, I can't seem to be able to edit that post ^, keeping it as-is for now in case it's worth debugging it :D
here is the same without broken tags:
being refused a job because you're `random discriminating attribute found on your profile> ( though no one will really admit to it due to most laws prohibiting that kind of stuff )
insurances increasing your premium because random search on your favorite internet board
higher airplane tickets because you already searched for them or because you already went there
selling you more and more "comfort" stuff that you don't really need but ads trick your brain into wanting them ( the whole targeted ads are what you want not what you need, at least with non-targeted ads you don't "want" a lot of it )
created https://gitlab.com/tildes/tildes/issues/95 I don't think mentions work yet @teaearlgraycold ( this is a not-so-subtle test ;) ) though maybe Deimos as some keyword alerts.
You don't need keyword alerts when you just read everything! Thanks though, I'll take a look. When it thinks something is an HTML tag it definitely gets really messed up, which should be a part of...
You don't need keyword alerts when you just read everything!
Thanks though, I'll take a look. When it thinks something is an HTML tag it definitely gets really messed up, which should be a part of this issue: https://gitlab.com/tildes/tildes/issues/7
For a generation whose entire teen lives are documented through images and opinions on social media I'd never want a potential employer to see, I'd argue the downsides for them are minimal....
For a generation whose entire teen lives are documented through images and opinions on social media I'd never want a potential employer to see, I'd argue the downsides for them are minimal.
Really, what does a company want with anonymized data regarding your hobbies, and your life? Why would someone want that information specifically about you? The control systems to ensure employee malpractice stops someone from looking someone they know are robust in the GDPR-requirements.
So to a lot of people, the cost-benefit basically shows "Free money" . I can and do choose not to have a Ralph's card, but I can totally understand why other people choose the other option.
It'll certainly help with the issue of people not knowing that they're giving away a ton of information.
On the other hand, people are more and more willing to give away their information for corporate perks: like your typical customer club program.
People want those programs, they ask for them. People are more than willing to give away plenty of personal information to save money.
GDPR gets at those who don't know what they're doing, but the latest statistics from my country at least, show that the younger people are, the more information they're willing to give away. A majority of the under-21s even say they're comfortable with "people selling ads to you based on your inferred sexual preferences"
In a way because no one has presented them with any material downsides for saying “yes” instead of “no”
As an under 21, What downsides are there, material or otherwise?
.... the list is ( most likely ) endless
interestingly, I can't seem to be able to edit that post ^, keeping it as-is for now in case it's worth debugging it :D
here is the same without broken tags:
random search on your favorite internet board.... the list is ( most likely ) endless
Maybe you've already PM'd him, but I'll ping @Deimos
created https://gitlab.com/tildes/tildes/issues/95
I don't think mentions work yet @teaearlgraycold ( this is a not-so-subtle test ;) ) though maybe Deimos as some keyword alerts.
You don't need keyword alerts when you just read everything!
Thanks though, I'll take a look. When it thinks something is an HTML tag it definitely gets really messed up, which should be a part of this issue: https://gitlab.com/tildes/tildes/issues/7
For a generation whose entire teen lives are documented through images and opinions on social media I'd never want a potential employer to see, I'd argue the downsides for them are minimal.
Really, what does a company want with anonymized data regarding your hobbies, and your life? Why would someone want that information specifically about you? The control systems to ensure employee malpractice stops someone from looking someone they know are robust in the GDPR-requirements.
So to a lot of people, the cost-benefit basically shows "Free money" . I can and do choose not to have a Ralph's card, but I can totally understand why other people choose the other option.