I have seen credible looking scientists on twitter say that the real problem with 5G is that the frequency is so close to water vapour, that it will interfere with weather sensors and hurricane...
I have seen credible looking scientists on twitter say that the real problem with 5G is that the frequency is so close to water vapour, that it will interfere with weather sensors and hurricane predictions.
This is absolutely my primary concern with 5G towers. It will be a significant setback to our capability to sense weather. Right now, our forecasts are accurate about a week-out. In areas where 5G...
This is absolutely my primary concern with 5G towers.
It will be a significant setback to our capability to sense weather. Right now, our forecasts are accurate about a week-out. In areas where 5G is deployed this accuracy falls to 2 days. :(
I think this article explains things very approachable. Especially mentioning that those frequencies have already been used before. I hate how every time a new technology appears people have to be...
I think this article explains things very approachable. Especially mentioning that those frequencies have already been used before. I hate how every time a new technology appears people have to be adamant on it being bad. I had some fliers lying around from people that handed them out in my city, claiming 5g kills insects. I sadly don’t have it anymore or I could upload it. Maybe if I see them again.
If you’d like to upload that poster with an image link it’d make for an interesting artifact when everyone knows 5G is safe. I agree this article was very approachable, although when I got to the...
If you’d like to upload that poster with an image link it’d make for an interesting artifact when everyone knows 5G is safe. I agree this article was very approachable, although when I got to the comparison of the EME spectrum to Australian destinations I was a little shocked as I wasn’t paying attention when I suddenly got to “Remember, you need to get all the way to Sydney before you’re actually in danger from ionizing radiation.” and had to backtrack a bit.
I have seen credible looking scientists on twitter say that the real problem with 5G is that the frequency is so close to water vapour, that it will interfere with weather sensors and hurricane predictions.
eg. https://www.salon.com/2019/09/04/hurricane-tracking-technology-is-about-to-regress-30-years-thanks-to-5g-cell-networks/
This is absolutely my primary concern with 5G towers.
It will be a significant setback to our capability to sense weather. Right now, our forecasts are accurate about a week-out. In areas where 5G is deployed this accuracy falls to 2 days. :(
I think this article explains things very approachable. Especially mentioning that those frequencies have already been used before. I hate how every time a new technology appears people have to be adamant on it being bad. I had some fliers lying around from people that handed them out in my city, claiming 5g kills insects. I sadly don’t have it anymore or I could upload it. Maybe if I see them again.
If you’d like to upload that poster with an image link it’d make for an interesting artifact when everyone knows 5G is safe. I agree this article was very approachable, although when I got to the comparison of the EME spectrum to Australian destinations I was a little shocked as I wasn’t paying attention when I suddenly got to “Remember, you need to get all the way to Sydney before you’re actually in danger from ionizing radiation.” and had to backtrack a bit.