I know it's in the article. I didn't see it as a possible oversight, but more of a burying the lede to garner clicks. SpaceJam, and internet randomness, fans are aware that the 1996 site has been...
I know it's in the article. I didn't see it as a possible oversight, but more of a burying the lede to garner clicks. SpaceJam, and internet randomness, fans are aware that the 1996 site has been a time capsule for 25 years and the headline reads like the old site is completely gone. The article keeps up the charade, by not mentioning that the old site was archived, until the second to last sentence.
It's not, it's just Vice being low effort for clicks.
I thought it was just a hasty oversight, but they acknowledge it in the article itself.
I know it's in the article. I didn't see it as a possible oversight, but more of a burying the lede to garner clicks. SpaceJam, and internet randomness, fans are aware that the 1996 site has been a time capsule for 25 years and the headline reads like the old site is completely gone. The article keeps up the charade, by not mentioning that the old site was archived, until the second to last sentence.
They would never!
good on them for archiving the site.
The article mentions that.