Clicking on 'tag' multiple times opens the dialog multiple times
The title and image say enough: Screenshot
The title and image say enough: Screenshot
You're right about my weak sources; however, I wasn't able to find much about it. I did find this article which also covers other apps that offered full anonimity, and why they all closed.
An excerpt:
"When you’re faced with a space where you can say anything, for what ever reason, people go to the most taboo subjects," says Byttow, who admits he has no overarching statement yet on human nature. "They go to the things they can’t say" otherwise, he adds.
Edit: Here's another article about it
For what it's worth: The idea of having randomised named on a thread-basis is exactly what Candid used to be doing. In their case, it eventually filled with trolls. Their advertisers realised that people would hate a lot, and shied away. Luckily, we don't have to rely on advertisers, but we still have the problem of people acting like trolls if they're fully anonymous.
I indeed haven't mentioned that, but the concept of unvoting other posts so only the real quality posts receive their scores might actually be what we're after. If you've upvoted a picture of a cat just because it's a cat ¹⁾, and a few minutes later you see actual quality content but you're out of votes, I'd like to encourage you to unvote the cat, and upvote the good content instead.
¹⁾ Bad example, but you get the idea
I like your idea of a reputation scale, with some ranges of reputation, instead of a number. For the colour-blind under us, you could add a letter instead (A through F, for example). The downside is that if there is a neutral / newbie rank, people will probably look down on those people (a bit like Stack Overflow's Reputation system). If you introduce a negative rank (for trolls, flames, etc), people might be able to just create a new account once the invitation system is gone.
However, I disagree on making everyone's history private. For example, if I like someone's content, and I am curious to see what else they've written about a specific topic, it'd be perfect to have a page where you can see what someone has written in which group. On the other hand, it also makes people with an opinion you don't like vulnerable to bullying, where one can tag all of their posts to damage the other person's reputation.
Ah yeah, good old timezones. I completely forgot about those. Server time might work, but will probably cause some annoyance as well. An option for setting local time might solve that issue, but will only add to the complexity of the server side. (Especially with those 30-minute-off zones and summertime shivers)
I get that we don't aim to keep our users online as long as possible for marketing reasons, but I regularly find myself forgetting about this website (especially because it's currently not all that active), so having some form of a daily pattern might contribute to more active users, with more content, and a more lively discussion. I could totally get it if that's not what we're after though.
When posting a comment, the width of the text seems limited. When I removed the max-width
from the p
and li
element, it filled the box as I expected it to. (Source)
To me, the second one looks better. Some padding left and right could be added, but I certainly wouldn't use a fixed maximum width there (A percentage would be fine, I guess).
Edit The seems seems to apply for posts as well.
I was thinking about something similar yet different, but instead of making a new post I'll add it to this discussion:
There are also a drawback I can thing of:
I agree with you that it shouldn't fully be the website's duty to take care of such things, but in the example you've given, it's clear that the text isn't equal to the actual URL, so I (and many others) would much more often check the URL. If a new-comer wouldn't know about hiding URLs behind text, I think they'd much quicker tap a malicious link, because they think the blue text is the actual website. Just my idea though
I would use "sway":
Other possibilities worth thinking about:
To indicate that a post is good:
cool / nice / good / super / great
To indicate that a post deserves to move up on the activity feed:
up / rise / plus / step
OS: Antergos
DM: Gnome
Editor: Atom or Vim
Doesn't need a difficult setup, and works fine for everything I need it to do
I don't know how other sites handle this issue, but I'd check that, if the message contains a URL, that domain matches the one in the actual URL. If it doesn't, maybe add a warning after clicking it, before going to the actual webpage.
As can be seen in this post in ~test it is possible to secretly refer to another webpage than the one actually typed. It's not the biggest priority as of now, but it would be nice to see this fixed before Tildes will go live.
In case the ~test post gets deleted, here's an example:
https://innocent.site/
Hmm, I myself don't know of another way to anonymously transfer money, but maybe someone else does
https://innocentsite.com/
Regarding this, I like how Ubuntu does it. For every amount of money they have a little icon that says what that amount is worth.
For example, if you're about to donate $15 (the default value) you get:
The same price as
King Kong versus Godzilla on DVD
$15
Which I think is neat. It makes one realise that $15 is actually not all that much.
Putting a notice like "Donate us a cup of coffee" makes $2 look less expensive.
For example: in Bitcoin or any other (popular) cryptocoin
Tanks! You too ☺