18 votes

Review: The Real North Korea, by Andrei Lankov

9 comments

  1. [6]
    skybrian
    (edited )
    Link
    From the review: … … …

    From the review:

    The author, Andrei Lankov, knows a lot about North Korea. Lankov grew up in the Soviet Union and attended university during glasnost. But while all his buddies were wearing jeans and doing student exchange programs in Western Europe, Lankov got chosen to study at… sad trombone Kim Il-Sung University in Pyongyang. He’s been back many times since then, speaks fluent Korean, chats frequently with North Korean defectors, and now has a teaching position at a university in Seoul. But Lankov has one other very important quality: that peculiar Slavic combination of grim fatalism and bleak humor. An American might get huffy or moralistic writing a book about decades of mass slaughter. It takes a Russian to treat the same topic with a deadpan sense of irony, thereby resulting in a very depressing book that is also very funny.

    Lankov argues that through the crucible of famine and economic collapse, the world’s most totalitarian society seamlessly transformed into a surreal hybrid of totalitarianism and anarcho-capitalism. The farms are a good example. Approximately all of the food is now grown off-the-books, unauthorized, in the middle of the night and then sold by private dealers. But the truly demented part is that the vast, centralized state-run farms are still there, occupying all the good land, producing nothing, fully-staffed by slave-farmers who go through the motions all day, and then sneak off at night to grow food for sale in their private plots. But those private plots that produce everything are necessarily located in the worst and least productive soil, soil that the state has officially written off.

    Or consider the factories. The black market economy that comprises the vast majority of North Korean GDP is dominated by women. This is a curious setup for such a fearsomely patriarchal society. But actually…it’s because the society is fearsomely patriarchal. The men are allocated jobs by the state. Many of those jobs are jobs in the factories. The problem is that the factories don’t actually exist anymore, and the machinery inside them has all been sold off for scrap metal. But the men have been assigned jobs, and the jobs are in the factories. So they sit in the rotting, empty shells of factories that haven’t functioned for decades, and that takes up a lot of their time. But the women, ah, the good North Korean woman is a housewife and a mother and a homemaker, which means she does not have a fake job in a fake factory, which means she can work a real job in a secret workshop in her house producing unauthorized goods, or buying and selling them in an unauthorized market.

    This “secret privatization” of the entire North Korean economy has been incredibly thorough. It’s estimated that around 80 percent of all goods and services in North Korea are provided in secret and in shadow. It’s capitalism as an extremophile species of lichen, colonizing the cracks and crevices of the official society, and keeping the whole system afloat. They are actually speedrunning the entire history of primitive accumulation leading to investment leading to the joint stock corporation. Large (secret) transportation companies now exist in North Korea and maintain unofficial roads forming an unofficial transit network. The trucks and buses are smuggled in from abroad, then “donated” to various government agencies, which then lease them back in exchange for kickbacks. In this way, they’ve reinvented the idea of funding government operations through corporate taxation in a hilariously roundabout way. There is a booming private restaurant scene.

    Lankov describes the North Korean elite as pervaded by a sense of dread — certain that their present trajectory leads to total destruction, but equally convinced that any deviation from it will only hasten the end. Like a mob boss who knows his odds of getting caught just keep rising, but also knows that any “retirement” will be a retirement to the grave. Yes, it is a cocytarchy. Perhaps this explains why defections from North Korea include not only peasants and slaves, but cadres at the very summit of power. For instance the current president’s older brother, Kim Jong-Nam, was once apprehended in Japan while traveling with his family under a false name with a Dominican passport. He claimed at the time that he only wanted to visit Disneyland, which is incredible if true, but I think it’s more likely that he wanted off a different crazy ride. And he did eventually get his wish. Kim Jong-Nam was assassinated with a nerve agent in 2017.

    12 votes
    1. [5]
      stu2b50
      Link Parent
      This seems the inevitable fate of all planned economies, for them to crumble and fail under their own weight, and for whatever amount of market trade that can exist at the time to sprout in those...

      It’s capitalism as an extremophile species of lichen, colonizing the cracks and crevices of the official society, and keeping the whole system afloat.

      This seems the inevitable fate of all planned economies, for them to crumble and fail under their own weight, and for whatever amount of market trade that can exist at the time to sprout in those cracks until they eventually subsume the entire system. Hopefully North Korea can get there at some point.

      7 votes
      1. [4]
        skybrian
        Link Parent
        I think that's generalizing too broadly from one example of particularly terrible leadership. What happened in North Korea doesn't seem inevitable. For example, another possible fate is what...

        I think that's generalizing too broadly from one example of particularly terrible leadership. What happened in North Korea doesn't seem inevitable. For example, another possible fate is what happened to China, where, after a lot of suffering, they decided that markets were sometimes okay.

        5 votes
        1. [3]
          stu2b50
          Link Parent
          I would say that what happened in China is exactly the same - in fact, it happened quicker. The planned economy of Mao quickly and utterly failed, leading to starvation and black markets picking...

          I would say that what happened in China is exactly the same - in fact, it happened quicker. The planned economy of Mao quickly and utterly failed, leading to starvation and black markets picking up slack, leading to decades of de facto unofficial markets until Deng Xiaoping made it official.

          7 votes
          1. [2]
            skybrian
            Link Parent
            I guess it depends what you mean by "crumble and fail." Sure, huge failures and enormous suffering, but regime change didn't happen. Things got better because the regime wasn't quite so inflexible.

            I guess it depends what you mean by "crumble and fail." Sure, huge failures and enormous suffering, but regime change didn't happen. Things got better because the regime wasn't quite so inflexible.

            2 votes
            1. stu2b50
              Link Parent
              I'm referring to the planned economy when I say "crumble and fail". The regime of the CCP didn't fail, but the ideations of Mao did - China today is absolutely a market based economy with de facto...

              I'm referring to the planned economy when I say "crumble and fail". The regime of the CCP didn't fail, but the ideations of Mao did - China today is absolutely a market based economy with de facto private ownership, and that's what the CCP rules over. Perhaps more government intervention than in other countries, but nonetheless the state does not try to determine allocations anymore.

              5 votes
  2. [3]
    EgoEimi
    Link
    There were interesting points raised by the author and a commenter about treating bad people well so they may give up power willingly. Though it may offend people to give folks like Gaddafi and...

    There were interesting points raised by the author and a commenter about treating bad people well so they may give up power willingly.

    Though it may offend people to give folks like Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein mansions and lavish lifestyles on secret, guarded islands, if it gets them to give up power sooner then it's a net win.

    But it's too late given how dictators typically meet a bad end when they give up or lose power. So now dictators and their lackeys are extremely motivated to hold onto power at all costs because there's no way off the ride.

    It all raises an interesting question: how should we feel about bribing dictators to retire? There are probably many tyrants who know that their odds of survival aren’t great, and who might be persuaded to leave office peacefully if the rest of the world could credibly commit to giving them a life of peace and luxury forever after.7 People would hate it. Our sense of cosmic justice would totally be offended. But could you get over that if it meant millions fewer corpses in the prison camps of North Korea? Fortunately it doesn’t matter what you think, because we are heading in the opposite direction. The last dictator who tried to quasi-retire, Muammar Gaddafi, gave up his WMDs, and then promptly became the recipient of a NATO air campaign before being sodomized to death by US-backed “moderate rebels.” If that’s how we reward good behavior, then it’s not very surprising that North Korea keeps building more nukes.

    And then a commenter writes

    Re: Gaddafi, before him there was Pinochet. Near the end of his reign, Chile agreed to hold a plebiscite on whether to continue the dictatorship. Pinochet lost, and after some pushing from other officers, he stepped down. Then a few years later everyone started trying to prosecute him for all the bad stuff he did and he spent the rest of his life in a legal cloud. Something approximately similar, if a bit less harsh, happened to South Korean ex-dictator Chun Doo-hwan. That'll teach 'em to relinquish power voluntarily.

    I worry that the ICC is accomplishing the same thing. If Putin dies tomorrow, Russia is full of people who will face dire legal sanctions if liberals ever take power. I'm worried in pursuit of justice, we're creating a larger and larger caste of tiger-riders.

    7 votes
    1. [2]
      div72
      Link Parent
      Wouldn't allowing dictators happy ends embolden more people to become dictators/make dictators more willing to commit heinous crimes?

      Wouldn't allowing dictators happy ends embolden more people to become dictators/make dictators more willing to commit heinous crimes?

      2 votes
      1. Minori
        Link Parent
        The goal is to offer them an off-ramp. If the dictator is out, then a more democratic government can be built up. I don't think they get a bigger off ramp the bigger their atrocities are. I also...

        The goal is to offer them an off-ramp. If the dictator is out, then a more democratic government can be built up. I don't think they get a bigger off ramp the bigger their atrocities are. I also doubt anyone is gonna convince the army to attempt a coup so they might be eligible for a better retirement package lol.

        1 vote