36 votes

The struggle to contain, and eat, the invasive deer taking over Hawaii

13 comments

  1. [7]
    skybrian
    Link
    From the article: … … … …

    From the article:

    The axis deer are a fascinating and multi-dimensional inhabitant. They are simultaneously invasive and part of traditional culture; they destroy food supplies and are an extremely important source of food themselves; they are protected by law and despised by some parts of law enforcement; they are wildly destructive to Hawaii and also, during the worst of COVID-19, were a beacon of hope.

    Axis deer, which are sometimes known as chital, are native to Sri Lanka, parts of India and Nepal. They’re sometimes known as the spotted deer, because they have white spots on their tawny coats, and sometimes as the barking deer, because they are extremely vocal. They first showed up in Hawaii in 1867, given as a gift to King Kamehameha V: three bucks, four does and one male faun, for a total of eight deer. The gift-givers were from Hong Kong, then a colony of Britain. The deer were initially released on Molokai, and they multiplied quickly; some were later moved to Oahu, Lanai and, eventually, in 1959, to Maui.

    [I]t’s not unreasonable to wonder whether the deer should simply be completely eradicated from Hawaii. And, in truth, Hawaii has taken some measures to keep the deer population from spreading: It is now illegal to move deer from one island to another, and when they were illegally brought to the Big Island in 2009, it took only a few years for the government to remove them all. Even in Maui, the Department of Forestry will remove deer from particularly delicate ecosystems, especially watersheds or places where there are endangered species, provided those places are on state land. “We’re the most isolated landmass on the planet,” says Jake Muise, one of the owners of Maui Nui, a commercial venison operation in Maui. (Muise also handled removing the deer from the Big Island, a few years back.) “If our watersheds aren’t functioning properly…water is the most valuable thing we have.”

    [T]he process for actually eradicating these deer from Hawaii would be insanely expensive and maybe impossible; while the Department can remove deer from state land, that land is often remote and rugged and not really the preferred habitat for the deer. Getting permission from every private landowner with deer on their property, and figuring out the liability situation for having government agents with guns there, all in the service of somehow killing and removing more than a hundred thousand deer? It’s just not going to happen.

    Another reason it’s not going to happen, beyond the practicalities, is that, according to Bagshaw, the deer are legally protected. The state constitution, dating back to at least 1950, has included a clause meant to protect the traditional subsistence practices of Hawaiians. But therein lies the question: What exactly is “traditional”? Hawaiian courts have set the precedent that any practice that existed in Hawaii before November 25, 1892 counts as “traditional.” That date was chosen for its importance to Hawaiian law; it was the last reorganization of the Kingdom of Hawaii’s judiciary system prior to American annexation. And the axis deer, of course, had arrived a couple of decades prior to that date. So the law that protects traditional subsistence practices applies, just barely, to a wildly destructive invasive species.

    Despite the fact that the axis deer doesn’t belong in Hawaii, that bit about it being protected as a subsistence practice isn’t actually that crazy. Deer hunting, although only 150 years old, has legitimately become a tradition on the islands of Molokai, Maui and Lanai. Deer, especially but not exclusively in the more rural parts of those islands, is a major part of the culture. Many families have extra chest freezers to store axis deer, and you can find it on the grill at backyard barbecues. (Most often, it’s sliced thin and marinated in teriyaki sauce, according to Muise.)

    The Department of Forestry is engaged in an awkward dance regarding the deer. It can’t eradicate the deer, even if that makes ecological sense. But it’s also the agency that hands out hunting permits, and boy, is it ever handing them out. “On Maui and Molokai, there is no bag limit and there is no season,” says Bagshaw. “You can hunt ’em like a videogame from sunrise to sunset, if you want.” The permits cost $20 for the year and require no more than a gun license and an easy online application. Frankly, the Department of Forestry would love it if hunting was even more common than it is.

    19 votes
    1. [3]
      BashCrandiboot
      Link Parent
      I'm sorry for going off topic, but the king's name was actually kamehameha? That is fucking incredible.

      I'm sorry for going off topic, but the king's name was actually kamehameha? That is fucking incredible.

      3 votes
      1. [2]
        DrStone
        Link Parent
        source

        Akira Toriyama actually tried a number of poses when he was alone in order to decide the best pose for the Kamehameha. After much contemplation, he could not decide on a name for his "Kame" attack, so he asked his wife (Nachi Mikami), who came up with the name.[13] She told Akira that it would be easy to remember the name of the attack if he used the name of the cultural Hawaiian king named Kamehameha (lit. "the very lonely one" or "the one set apart" in Hawaiian language).

        source

        8 votes
    2. [3]
      ebonGavia
      (edited )
      Link Parent
      🙄🙄🙄🙄 (Not your fault OP.) Back in the old days we used to care about spelling and grammar. For everyone else, not that you'll care, but a FAWN is a baby deer, and a FAUN is something from Roman...

      faun

      🙄🙄🙄🙄

      (Not your fault OP.) Back in the old days we used to care about spelling and grammar.

      For everyone else, not that you'll care, but a FAWN is a baby deer, and a FAUN is something from Greek Roman mythology.

      16 votes
      1. [2]
        sparksbet
        Link Parent
        To be even more pedantic, they're called satyrs in Greek mythology. Faun is the term for them in Roman mythology.

        To be even more pedantic, they're called satyrs in Greek mythology. Faun is the term for them in Roman mythology.

        16 votes
        1. ebonGavia
          Link Parent
          (Genuinely) Thank you for the correction.

          (Genuinely) Thank you for the correction.

          11 votes
  2. [6]
    hungariantoast
    Link
    Of all the deer and antelope I've tried, Axis has by far been my favorite. Here in Texas there are so many of them, especially out west around places like Uvalde and Rocksprings, that they can be...

    Of all the deer and antelope I've tried, Axis has by far been my favorite.

    Here in Texas there are so many of them, especially out west around places like Uvalde and Rocksprings, that they can be taken and had processed for pretty cheap. Like in Hawaii, there's no bag limit or season for them, since they're considered exotics.

    I wish I had something to offer regarding the state's deer problem, but honestly the thing I really took away from this article is that Hawaii isn't self-sufficient for food, and that troubles me quite a bit.

    12 votes
    1. [5]
      MimicSquid
      Link Parent
      It theoretically could be self-sufficient, but cash crops pay more than produce. It would require a serious overhaul and an ongoing focus on sustainability to make that change.

      It theoretically could be self-sufficient, but cash crops pay more than produce. It would require a serious overhaul and an ongoing focus on sustainability to make that change.

      7 votes
      1. [4]
        hungariantoast
        Link Parent
        Yeah, I think the article laid it out pretty well (copied below for others). Being as isolated as Hawaii is, and being so dependent on food imports? Maybe it's just because I've lived in a state...

        Yeah, I think the article laid it out pretty well (copied below for others).

        The deer also serves a pretty vital role as a source of protein. While Hawaii was perfectly capable of feeding its own population prior to European contact, the late 19th and early 20th centuries destroyed Hawaiian agriculture. Instead of planting crops that could feed the Hawaiian people, such as taro, breadfruit and coconut, Europeans (and soon, Americans) tore all that out to plant the crops that could feed foreign imperialists, such as sugarcane and pineapple. By 1936, Hawaii was, according to a University of Hawaii study, in desperate straits: Only 37 percent of its food was grown locally. The rest was, and remains today, imported, at great expense and significant risk, mostly from the mainland United States.

        Being as isolated as Hawaii is, and being so dependent on food imports? Maybe it's just because I've lived in a state of constant hurricanes, storms, power outages, pandemics, and crises since 2017, and that's contributed hard to my pseudo-prepper brainrot, but food self-sufficiency is like the #1 thing I would be interested in tackling as a leader of Hawaii.

        Says me, living in his glass house, less than ten miles from the carcinogen plants, with zero gardens in his backyard.

        Or maybe Hawaiians are cool with it, because of all the goddamn deer lmao

        14 votes
        1. Odysseus
          Link Parent
          It's just what it is in Hawaii. Everyone is well aware that if the boats are even delayed a bit, the grocery store shelves are empty (it doesn't even have to be a natural disaster, a contract...

          It's just what it is in Hawaii. Everyone is well aware that if the boats are even delayed a bit, the grocery store shelves are empty (it doesn't even have to be a natural disaster, a contract negotiation can be enough - the Jones Act means that there's very little competition shipping goods between Hawaii and California as well as very high costs).

          Some folks prep, lots of people grow some food, but very few grow enough to live off of. On an individual level though, there's not much you can do. Prepping in a sustainable way requires land, and land on the Hawaiian islands is expensive. That's not even getting into the energy issue, with all of the energy (mainly petroleum) in Hawaii also being brought in by ship.

          11 votes
        2. [2]
          skybrian
          Link Parent
          Oahu’s population is a lot higher than a hundred years ago. Honolulu had 200k people in 1950 and above 900k today. So I think it’s questionable if Oahu could be self-sufficient for food. Maybe...

          Oahu’s population is a lot higher than a hundred years ago. Honolulu had 200k people in 1950 and above 900k today. So I think it’s questionable if Oahu could be self-sufficient for food. Maybe some of the other islands, though?

          It’s kind of a moot point when cutting off trade would be devastating economically. (Consider the pandemic and tourism.)

          From a disaster preparation point of view, having a lot of food in storage would be good, though. I wonder what preparations there are?

          2 votes
          1. MimicSquid
            Link Parent
            There's about 2 million acres of land currently zoned for agriculture in Hawaii, and estimates for how much land is needed per person vary wildly, from .1 acres to 4 acres, depending on...

            There's about 2 million acres of land currently zoned for agriculture in Hawaii, and estimates for how much land is needed per person vary wildly, from .1 acres to 4 acres, depending on assumptions. It seems that, if focused on agriculture efficiency, Hawaii might be able to be nutritionally self sufficient, though even so they'd have to be importing fertilizer. True 100% self sufficiency isn't really compatible with modern living standards.

            5 votes