32
votes
What my adult autism diagnosis finally explained
Link information
This data is scraped automatically and may be incorrect.
- Title
- I Was Diagnosed With Autism in My 40s. It Gave Me a Lot of Answers.
- Authors
- Mary H.K. Choi
- Published
- Jul 3 2024
- Word count
- 6033 words
From the article (archive link)
This is a very writerly narrative of one person's discovery that ASD is a good explanatory model for her experiences in life. She expresses the perpetual feeling of wrongness, the combined hypersensitivity and obliviousness, the sense that everyone else was born with an intuitive social manual and she has to write hers as she goes along.
Over the years, I've spoken with a number of professional authors, both fiction and non-fiction. It's my sense that the majority are more than slightly askew from the common frame of social reference. The qualities of meticulous observation and taxonomy Choi mentions are incredible assets in writing, but not in fluid social interaction.
In Choi's words:
I'm not a psychiatrist and it's not within my capacity to say, "this person clearly is on the spectrum". Awareness of neurodiversity has grown over the years, as has medical recognition that there are distinctive constellations of behaviors and traits that fit the diagnostic category of "autism spectrum disorders". High-functioning people who used to be dismissed as "neurotic" or "eccentric" are now better able to manage intense personal and interpersonal suffering.
The appearance of the Internet has made social connections among neurodivergent people less fraught. A whole generation has had the benefit of common forums to discuss and share strategies for life. But ASD is still a surprise for the older folks who grew up with all the bad or mistaken labels and never understood anything other than "something is mysteriously, unfixably wrong about you, live with it". Quite a bit of Choi's narrative was resonant for me.
At the same time, I sometimes wonder if something is mysteriously, unfixably wrong with the vast majority of people. Whether the sum of our traumas, the gaps in our knowledge and experience, the stimuli we never evolved controlled responses for, the constant choice demands, the sheer pressure of human numbers, are simply too much.
I think it's important to remember that neurodiversity and neurodivergence (ND) are broad categories. Neurodivegence often gets shunted down to Autism and ADHD but even the most common definitions I've seen include OCD due to some of the relationships between the disorders. Other definitions will include depression, anxiety, etc.
I know historically studies have shown a likelihood that authors and artists are more likely to experience mental illness than the general population. So by definition it makes sense that you'd see ND among authors and artists. Her experience is why I think that diagnosis can be powerful, but it can also be harmful for some folks.
Anecdotally, ND, for most neurotypicals, seems to imply ASD.
As someone who has forcibly become educated in ADHD over the years, ADHD is widely misunderstood by nearly everyone who lacks the diagnosis or an immediate family member with same.
Here is my attempt to help bridge this gap.
Even among ND communities we mostly reduce it down to the Autistic/ADHD boxes!
I sometimes wonder the same. I think through the people I've met, the family and friends I have, and wonder if there is in fact a normal person anywhere on Earth. Or if we have spent so much of our collective time over previous generations suppressing, hiding, and camouflaging all our unique mental traits to create the illusion of "normal".
It's definitely this. Our concept of normal is influenced so much by culture, the people in our social circles, media, history, etc. The concept of a "normal person" is an illusion - it's like combining multiple images of people to create an averaged, yet attractive, face that doesn't actually exist in reality. We're all comparing our weirdly-functioning brains to this averaged perfection personified by society.