Dangerous. When this is presumably one of the last and best left of the land. Country is beyond in trouble Wiki has a large section on trans coverage shift, and also mentions the Gaza controversy:
Dangerous. When this is presumably one of the last and best left of the land. Country is beyond in trouble
Wiki has a large section on trans coverage shift, and also mentions the Gaza controversy:
The New York Times has received criticism for its coverage of the Gaza war and genocide.[361][362] In April 2024, The Intercept reported that a November 2023 internal memorandum by Susan Wessling and Philip Pan instructed journalists to reduce using the terms "genocide" and "ethnic cleansing" and to avoid using the phrase "occupied territory" in the context of Palestinian land, "Palestine" except in rare circumstances, and the term "refugee camps" to describe areas of Gaza despite recognition from the United Nations.
I feel like trans folks have been screaming about this for a while (as has podcaster Michael Hobbes in like extensive detail). I know I've been incredibly critical here and elsewhere for years...
I feel like trans folks have been screaming about this for a while (as has podcaster Michael Hobbes in like extensive detail). I know I've been incredibly critical here and elsewhere for years now.
I appreciate having this broken down... I just wish it weren't necessary
It hurts precisely the most because their cynical moves cost them nothing while it cost the trans community everything.
This is true within the Times, as well, which I'm sure is not surprising to you. Trans employees at the Times and their allies (which was, luckily, most of their colleagues) were regularly...
This is true within the Times, as well, which I'm sure is not surprising to you. Trans employees at the Times and their allies (which was, luckily, most of their colleagues) were regularly outraged at how attrocious the Times' coverage of trans people was. Not that it helped, obviously.
Yes, my issues with the Times are primarily about the leadership and certain writers vs the majority of their employees. Unfortunately change didn't happen despite those efforts.
Yes, my issues with the Times are primarily about the leadership and certain writers vs the majority of their employees. Unfortunately change didn't happen despite those efforts.
Dangerous. When this is presumably one of the last and best left of the land. Country is beyond in trouble
Wiki has a large section on trans coverage shift, and also mentions the Gaza controversy:
I feel like trans folks have been screaming about this for a while (as has podcaster Michael Hobbes in like extensive detail). I know I've been incredibly critical here and elsewhere for years now.
I appreciate having this broken down... I just wish it weren't necessary
Yeah. We know who gets sacrificed.
This is true within the Times, as well, which I'm sure is not surprising to you. Trans employees at the Times and their allies (which was, luckily, most of their colleagues) were regularly outraged at how attrocious the Times' coverage of trans people was. Not that it helped, obviously.
Yes, my issues with the Times are primarily about the leadership and certain writers vs the majority of their employees. Unfortunately change didn't happen despite those efforts.