10 votes

Weekly US politics news and updates thread - week of February 12

This thread is posted weekly - please try to post all relevant US political content in here, such as news, updates, opinion articles, etc. Extremely significant events may warrant a separate topic, but almost all should be posted in here.

This is an inherently political thread; please try to avoid antagonistic arguments and bickering matches. Comment threads that devolve into unproductive arguments may be removed so that the overall topic is able to continue.

23 comments

  1. [10]
    langis_on
    Link
    Judge fines Donald Trump more than $350 million, bars him from running businesses in N.Y. for three years
    8 votes
    1. [5]
      KapteinB
      Link Parent
      I'm glad to see the judge included his sons as well. Anyone know what happens during the appeal process? The article says he'll probably have to post a bond, but other than that, can he continue...

      I'm glad to see the judge included his sons as well.

      Anyone know what happens during the appeal process? The article says he'll probably have to post a bond, but other than that, can he continue doing business there?

      5 votes
      1. [4]
        langis_on
        Link Parent
        I've read that, if he appeals, he will have to put up the entire fine in escrow while the appeals court reviews the case. I'm not 100% sure if that it accurate though.

        I've read that, if he appeals, he will have to put up the entire fine in escrow while the appeals court reviews the case. I'm not 100% sure if that it accurate though.

        2 votes
        1. [3]
          ackables
          Link Parent
          He can get a bond for it, so in reality he only needs to put up as much as a bondsman takes as collateral. It should still be a lot of money though.

          He can get a bond for it, so in reality he only needs to put up as much as a bondsman takes as collateral. It should still be a lot of money though.

          1 vote
          1. MimicSquid
            Link Parent
            He's also banned from taking out bank loans for 3 years, so whoever loans him that money will be an interesting character, I'm sure.

            He's also banned from taking out bank loans for 3 years, so whoever loans him that money will be an interesting character, I'm sure.

            1 vote
          2. psi
            Link Parent
            He could in principle get a bond, but he will be hard-pressed to find a bondsman willing/able to loan him hundreds of millions of dollars. It's worth noting that he didn't use a bondsman to appeal...

            He could in principle get a bond, but he will be hard-pressed to find a bondsman willing/able to loan him hundreds of millions of dollars. It's worth noting that he didn't use a bondsman to appeal Carroll 1 (in which "only" a few million dollars are at stake).

            There's a decent chance he'll be forced to liquidate some property if he wants to appeal this decision.

            1 vote
    2. [4]
      PantsEnvy
      Link Parent
      The law is a really weird one, it does not require showing any actual harm to anyone. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/16/nyregion/trump-fraud-trial-ny-law.html So while it has been used by Letitia...

      The law is a really weird one, it does not require showing any actual harm to anyone.

      https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/16/nyregion/trump-fraud-trial-ny-law.html

      So while it has been used by Letitia James to go after the oil company Exxon Mobil, the tobacco brand Juul and the pharma executive Martin Shkreli, it does open Letitia James up to accusations of political bias.

      1. [2]
        FriendlyGnome
        Link Parent
        Speeding or running a red light, while not crashing into anything, also doesn't harm anyone. Does that mean speeding and red lights laws should only be enforced if they result in direct harm, per...

        Speeding or running a red light, while not crashing into anything, also doesn't harm anyone. Does that mean speeding and red lights laws should only be enforced if they result in direct harm, per incident?

        But if you read the decision, the penalties are actually based on exactly how much the bank did lose out on due to the fraud. This was quantifiable because the bank literally gave Trump loan offers with and without personal guarantees, and he opted for the one with a personal guarantee that was based on fraudulent accounting (and which had a much, much lower interest rate)

        6 votes
        1. PantsEnvy
          Link Parent
          Yes, false declarations deserve punishment. A lot of people have been convicted criminally of very minor false declarations made under perjury. Clearly Trump lied, he told the IRS one thing, and...

          Yes, false declarations deserve punishment. A lot of people have been convicted criminally of very minor false declarations made under perjury. Clearly Trump lied, he told the IRS one thing, and the government another thing. It's still a weird law that is open to completely valid accusations of misuse.

          Yes, I read the decision, the penalties were based on what an expert witness testified the interest rate would have been if Trumps asset estimates had been more accurate. Yet the banks seemed to claim no harm no foul, yet it didn't matter, because the law didn't require harm. I think Trump basically admitted the declaration was false before the trial even began, by the same team that didn't even request a jury trial.

          1 vote
      2. [2]
        Comment deleted by author
        Link Parent
        1. PantsEnvy
          Link Parent
          She is a very impressive DA. I like what she has done with the law. I do not like the law itself.

          She is a very impressive DA.

          I like what she has done with the law.

          I do not like the law itself.

          1 vote
  2. [6]
    Comment deleted by author
    Link
    1. [2]
      boxer_dogs_dance
      Link Parent
      If the alternative is Trump? I would literally vote for anyone over Trump

      If the alternative is Trump? I would literally vote for anyone over Trump

      6 votes
      1. anadem
        Link Parent
        Yes, me too! But the issue is made of those who would abstain from voting for anyone because they recognize Biden's weakness.

        I would literally vote for anyone over Trump

        Yes, me too! But the issue is made of those who would abstain from voting for anyone because they recognize Biden's weakness.

    2. [2]
      Omnicrola
      Link Parent
      I'm not familiar with the historical precedent, but how often have presidents chosen a new VP? Is that a viable strategy here?

      and will either resign or die in office so that Kamala Harris can take over?

      I'm not familiar with the historical precedent, but how often have presidents chosen a new VP? Is that a viable strategy here?

      1 vote
      1. boxer_dogs_dance
        Link Parent
        My understanding is that Biden is free to choose a new VP candidate before the convention and I wish he would.

        My understanding is that Biden is free to choose a new VP candidate before the convention and I wish he would.

        1 vote
    3. Eji1700
      Link Parent
      The problem with all of this is simple: It's too late. There's edge cases where maybe a new candidate could get on the ballot, but important deadlines have already passed. The time for this...

      The problem with all of this is simple:

      It's too late. There's edge cases where maybe a new candidate could get on the ballot, but important deadlines have already passed. The time for this conversation was the day after he beat trump, and of course it hasn't been done, and it hasn't been done because they don't believe it. Pelosi is 83 and not going fucking anywhere.

      He was old then, he's old now. There has been evidence from the beginning that he's not just "old" but straight up "unfit", but our alternative is a literal wannabe dictator who only failed because he's actually fucking terrible at it.

  3. [3]
    PantsEnvy
    Link
    Super Bowl 2024 was most watched US TV broadcast since 1969 Moon landing My kid is not even a huge fan of Taylor Swift, but the only crowd shots that interested him were of Taylor Swift. I imagine...

    Super Bowl 2024 was most watched US TV broadcast since 1969 Moon landing

    Taylor Swift's highly anticipated attendance to watch boyfriend Travis Kelce may have boosted the figures.

    My kid is not even a huge fan of Taylor Swift, but the only crowd shots that interested him were of Taylor Swift.

    I imagine broadcasters are trying to thread a fine needle, by showing enough Taylor to appeal to the younger fans who are sitting through three hours of sports just to see less than 3 minutes of Taylor Swift, and yet not showing too much to upset the conservative fans, some of whom get angered by Swift.

    3 votes
    1. [2]
      wowbagger
      Link Parent
      It sounds impressive but they could have run the same headline in 2023, 2015, 2014, 2012, and 2011. The NFL market in the US grows each year with the population, and Super Bowl viewership varies...

      It sounds impressive but they could have run the same headline in 2023, 2015, 2014, 2012, and 2011. The NFL market in the US grows each year with the population, and Super Bowl viewership varies year-to-year based on which teams are playing and who's putting on the halftime show. A better comparison would be to adjust for population.

      Also, I get that the far-right media sphere was having one of their hissy fits about Swift being at this game but does breaking viewership records really count as political news?

      6 votes
      1. PantsEnvy
        Link Parent
        Yeah, good point on the statistics. I didn't check before posting. This is a general US politics, US news and US updates thread. We have a lot of non-US folks, the idea was they could ignore this...

        Yeah, good point on the statistics. I didn't check before posting.

        This is a general US politics, US news and US updates thread.

        We have a lot of non-US folks, the idea was they could ignore this thread and not be overwhelmed by noisy US neighbors.

        2 votes
  4. [2]
    updawg
    (edited )
    Link
    Manchin says he won’t run for president, ending speculation about an independent bid. https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/02/16/us/trump-haley-biden-election I honestly have no idea who he would...

    Manchin says he won’t run for president, ending speculation about an independent bid.
    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/02/16/us/trump-haley-biden-election

    I honestly have no idea who he would have stolen votes from.

    2 votes
    1. TheRtRevKaiser
      Link Parent
      I suspect pretty much nobody, which is probably why he's not running...

      I suspect pretty much nobody, which is probably why he's not running...

      4 votes
  5. [2]
    updawg
    Link
    Trump Privately Expresses Support for a 16-Week Abortion Ban https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/16/us/politics/trump-abortion-ban.html

    Trump Privately Expresses Support for a 16-Week Abortion Ban
    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/16/us/politics/trump-abortion-ban.html

    2 votes
    1. langis_on
      Link Parent
      I hope he comes out and says it in a debate or rally. Running on an anti-abortion campaign is a losing strategy

      I hope he comes out and says it in a debate or rally. Running on an anti-abortion campaign is a losing strategy

      3 votes