If I had to guess (and this is total speculation), it was probably an attempt to get access to a drug storage locker, so I don't imagine it was a very big explosion or terrorism related....
If I had to guess (and this is total speculation), it was probably an attempt to get access to a drug storage locker, so I don't imagine it was a very big explosion or terrorism related. Apparently the Goldenson Building, where this took place, is home to Harvard's Biomedical Research and Neuroscience labs, so make of that what you will.
Are the locks on those explosion grade? And wouldn't that risk damaging the contents? With the prevalence of lock picking knowledge online that seems a bit unlikely to me.
Are the locks on those explosion grade? And wouldn't that risk damaging the contents? With the prevalence of lock picking knowledge online that seems a bit unlikely to me.
If it’s for controlled substances, the DEA standard is apparently TL-30, meaning it must withstand 30 minutes of being attacked by tools. Explosives are a separate rating (TXTL), and I suspect a...
If it’s for controlled substances, the DEA standard is apparently TL-30, meaning it must withstand 30 minutes of being attacked by tools. Explosives are a separate rating (TXTL), and I suspect a relatively small amount of explosives could get you in.
Notably, the selection of tools (specifically power tools) is both a bit limited and somewhat vague. They DO mention abrasive cutting wheels, though they don't specifically say battery or plug-in...
TL-30, meaning it must withstand 30 minutes of being attacked by tools
Notably, the selection of tools (specifically power tools) is both a bit limited and somewhat vague. They DO mention abrasive cutting wheels, though they don't specifically say battery or plug-in powered grinders (or otherwise specify the type and power of tool using a cutting disk) so I would be curious to know what their limits are to pass the TL-30 test.
Example: an older Ni-Cad battery powered grinder is materially different than a modern Lion or Lipo powered grinder. More torque, higher max RPM, etc... Then there are modern corded grinders, and then things like gasoline powered concrete saws...
So, yeah, I'd be curious about the specifics of what they use to test for that 30 minute rating and just how aggressive they get.
Two Massachusetts men arrested in connection with an explosion Saturday at Harvard University are accused of detonating a firework inside a laboratory locker in a medical building, federal authorities said Tuesday.
Logan David Patterson, 18, of Bourne, and Dominick Frank Cardoza, 20, of Plymouth, were charged with conspiracy to damage by means of fire or an explosive. If convicted, they could face up to five years in prison, three years of supervised release and fines of up to $250,000.
The explosion happened on the fourth floor of the Goldenson Building, part of the school’s medical campus in Boston. The firework was detonated inside a laboratory locker, Foley said.
A motive is still being investigated. Docks alleged that Cardoza tried to throw away the pants he was wearing on the day of the explosion and that both men "boasted" about it to their friends.
Motive seems to be "Hey bro watch this." Maybe it was something else but like, you don't need more than that. But maybe I've just seen too many conduct reports lately.
Motive seems to be "Hey bro watch this."
Maybe it was something else but like, you don't need more than that. But maybe I've just seen too many conduct reports lately.
People pee on their roommates' clothes often enough that not only does it not surprise me but I also always ask if it's a drunk pee or a spite pee (or both.) It's common enough I have a locked and...
People pee on their roommates' clothes often enough that not only does it not surprise me but I also always ask if it's a drunk pee or a spite pee (or both.) It's common enough I have a locked and loaded follow up question. Students point laser pointers at cops from a window multiple times a year. I just expect this sort of thing.
If we had fireworks in this state I'm sure we'd have had a *I got a great idea, it'll be hilarious" moment. I wouldn't be shocked if they posted it on socials too.
Work in housing in higher ed and you'll rarely be surprised after the first year. Because you'll see EVERYTHING
Explosion like "Halloween stupid fireworks prank", or explosion like "domestic terrorism"? The article isn't clear.
If I had to guess (and this is total speculation), it was probably an attempt to get access to a drug storage locker, so I don't imagine it was a very big explosion or terrorism related. Apparently the Goldenson Building, where this took place, is home to Harvard's Biomedical Research and Neuroscience labs, so make of that what you will.
Are the locks on those explosion grade? And wouldn't that risk damaging the contents? With the prevalence of lock picking knowledge online that seems a bit unlikely to me.
If it’s for controlled substances, the DEA standard is apparently TL-30, meaning it must withstand 30 minutes of being attacked by tools. Explosives are a separate rating (TXTL), and I suspect a relatively small amount of explosives could get you in.
Notably, the selection of tools (specifically power tools) is both a bit limited and somewhat vague. They DO mention abrasive cutting wheels, though they don't specifically say battery or plug-in powered grinders (or otherwise specify the type and power of tool using a cutting disk) so I would be curious to know what their limits are to pass the TL-30 test.
Example: an older Ni-Cad battery powered grinder is materially different than a modern Lion or Lipo powered grinder. More torque, higher max RPM, etc... Then there are modern corded grinders, and then things like gasoline powered concrete saws...
So, yeah, I'd be curious about the specifics of what they use to test for that 30 minute rating and just how aggressive they get.
Update: 2 men arrested in explosion at Harvard University and accused of setting off firework in medical building, FBI says
Motive seems to be "Hey bro watch this."
Maybe it was something else but like, you don't need more than that. But maybe I've just seen too many conduct reports lately.
Yeah, it's definitely looking like it was "just a prank, bro!" ಠ_ಠ
People pee on their roommates' clothes often enough that not only does it not surprise me but I also always ask if it's a drunk pee or a spite pee (or both.) It's common enough I have a locked and loaded follow up question. Students point laser pointers at cops from a window multiple times a year. I just expect this sort of thing.
If we had fireworks in this state I'm sure we'd have had a *I got a great idea, it'll be hilarious" moment. I wouldn't be shocked if they posted it on socials too.
Work in housing in higher ed and you'll rarely be surprised after the first year. Because you'll see EVERYTHING
LOL, that's pretty F'd up. And hearing that makes me glad I never lived in res myself.
It's honestly usually more funny than not
As an outside observer, sure, but I don't imagine it's particularly funny for the person who had their clothes pissed on. :P
Nope. Definitely from a staff angle. It's also a pain because people are upset and it makes you do a lot of work. But you laugh rather than crash out