-
16 votes
-
US President Donald Trump announces pause in ‘reciprocal’ tariffs for all countries but China
41 votes -
US forges ahead with 104% tariffs on China
47 votes -
Finland's underground facilities, which can double as bomb shelters, have emerged as an inspiring approach as Europe ramps up preparedness after Russia's invasion of Ukraine
10 votes -
Countries say Donald Trump's White House hasn’t responded on tariff talks
14 votes -
Two UK MPs 'astounded' after being denied entry to Israel
10 votes -
Danes are boycotting American goods - one grocery chain reports that sales of Denmark's own cola brand has increased at least thirteen-fold
Posting not a link as it's just a newsflash type thing. Translations with deepl. Edited some of the text myself to get rid of some redundant stuff. Link In March, sales of Jolly Cola increased at...
Posting not a link as it's just a newsflash type thing. Translations with deepl. Edited some of the text myself to get rid of some redundant stuff.
In March, sales of Jolly Cola increased at least 13-fold in Rema 1000 compared to the same period last year. Grocery chains Coop and Fleggaard have also seen significant increases. The Jolly Cola brewery also said earlier in March that they have never experienced anything like this.
Further context:
Danes are bypassing American products, and chains are feeling it.
The boycott movement can be felt at the Danish fast food chain: ""We are clearly experiencing a growing interest. The fact that we are a Danish burger chain is an interesting alternative to the American chains for many Danes."
At a vintner, the anti-American movement is not a big issue, but the wine merchant has still received a “no thanks” from some customers when he has suggested an American wine: "Now that Trump has come to power, the demand is not as great as it used to be. Some people are simply opting out."
Even though consumers in Denmark want to send a signal and turn their backs on Trump and the US with their wallets, it could ultimately be a disservice to ourselves: "It should not become a joint boycott against the US, because we risk losing significantly more as a country than we gain from it. If the US suddenly says that it's time to stop buying Novo Nordisk medicines in the US, it will hit the Danish economy tenfold compared to the effect a consumer boycott has on the US economy,” he says. “There is no reason for us to provoke this trade war to become even fiercer than it already is."
Oh, and then there's also this:
Danish grocery chain to distinguish European from US goods.
More chains are joining in now: Coop to introduce labeling of American goods
24 votes -
Europe talks tough on military spending, but unity is fracturing
8 votes -
US Army to build "warrior ethos" by no longer mandating basic laws of war or combat medicine training for all soldiers
33 votes -
Hungary withdraws from International Criminal Court during Benjamin Netanyahu visit
14 votes -
UK open to Canadian involvement in new fighter jet project
19 votes -
Norway's proximity to the USSR during the Cold War led to it building many military bunkers – tensions with Russia have brought them back into focus
7 votes -
China, Japan, South Korea will jointly respond to US tariffs, Chinese state media says
38 votes -
Finland plans to quit global convention banning anti-personnel landmines and boost defense spending to at least 3% of GDP by 2029
18 votes -
Russian President Vladimir Putin launches largest military draft in years despite ceasefire talks
22 votes -
Chinese military exercises around Taiwan
14 votes -
US President Donald Trump revokes legal status of 530,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans
43 votes -
Could you rearm Europe without US weapons? - Equipping a unified European military (April 1 special)
9 votes -
Denmark will start drafting women into its military from next year, accelerating planned reforms to boost the size of its armed forces
20 votes -
The Donald Trump US administration accidentally texted me its war plans
107 votes -
Why it's time for Norway and Iceland to join the EU – with sufficient political will, both could join in an expedited procedure within two to three years
9 votes -
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney calls for snap election amid trade war with US
24 votes -
EU slams the door on US in colossal defense plan
36 votes -
For four Venezuelan friends, Alien Enemies Act cuts short an American dream
9 votes -
Why Sweden needs the bomb – country best served by nuclear guarantee outside of traditional NATO reliance on US atomic umbrella
15 votes -
The real reason US President Donald Trump submits to Vladimir Putin
10 votes -
European rearmament - the rearm Europe plan and the future of US weapon sales
10 votes -
Pentagon tasked with providing ‘military options’ to ensure US access to Panama Canal, memo says
16 votes -
An unexpected Donald Trump bump for the world's centrists
26 votes -
Greenland’s center-right opposition wins closely watched election dominated by Donald Trump’s annexation threat
15 votes -
Volodymyr Zelenskyy accepts US' thirty-day ceasefire proposal
14 votes -
Ukraine launches massive drone attack on Moscow ahead of US-Ukrainian talks
41 votes -
Iceland may be small, but its strategic importance is vast – as Donald Trump questions NATO commitments, European allies must step up before the Arctic becomes the next geopolitical flashpoint
17 votes -
Syria merges Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces into state institutions
18 votes -
Canadian provinces’ measures to limit electricity exports to US could strain cross-border ties, experts say
18 votes -
The changing war in Ukraine - the US aid freeze, momentum and how the war has changed in 2025
17 votes -
A French senator’s speech on Ukraine, Donald Trump, and the future of Europe
38 votes -
Donald Trump administration cancels $400M in grants and contracts with Columbia University
20 votes -
Denmark's spectacular shift from Atlanticism to European defense – fearing destabilization of transatlantic relationship, it had historically avoided European defense integration
7 votes -
Sweden and Finland's defence sectors are benefiting from their countries joining NATO – both aim to raise defence spending to between 2.6% and 3% of GDP in the next three years
11 votes -
BlackRock strikes $23 billion deal to place Panama Canal ports under American control
17 votes -
How the Vatican's embassies work
7 votes -
Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia promises to force a vote in the US Senate over whether to authorize Donald Trump Canada tariffs
19 votes -
White House seeks plan for possible Russia sanctions relief, sources say
26 votes -
US President Donald Trump cuts short talks with Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelenskyy after Oval Office blow up
91 votes -
Locals now have two fears: Donald Trump and climate change – Greenlanders don't want to be Danish. Greenlanders don't want to be American.
9 votes -
Norway's natural gas windfall should go to Ukraine – the country provides less support, as a share of GDP, than its neighbours
6 votes -
Sunday morning musings no. 1. Does anyone really know what’s happening in Ukraine?
Heretofore, I have held the idea that, 1)Russia is a despotic aggressor, 2)Ukraine is largely innocent holder of resources and land, and 3)Ukraine is largely winning due to a combination of pluck...
Heretofore, I have held the idea that, 1)Russia is a despotic aggressor, 2)Ukraine is largely innocent holder of resources and land, and 3)Ukraine is largely winning due to a combination of pluck and western supplies.
But I heard a recent podcast, however, that caused me to question my line of thinking. The podcast was Chapo Trap House* and they had guest podcasts hosts War Nerd or something, who seem to have some expertise in the slavic world. And they presented a very different narrative. Namely, 1)Ukrainians really want the war to end, even if the country loses some land, 2)There’s tons of corruption in the military, as bad as leaders demanding payment from soldiers to avoid deployment to the front lines, 3)There are fascist units in the military, and they shake down the civilians, 4) Zelensky was of a mind to deal with Russia until Biden asked him not to, 5)Russias economy is very resilient and has adapted to sanctions, and 6)Russia has been very adept at neutralizing new western military tech, and 7) there is a conspiracy of silence about Ukrainian casualties. Side note, there may be problematic funding of all the open source intelligence arms, especially bellingcat, by US Governemtnt intelligence interests.
I managed to confirm at least partially one of the objections:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/05/politics/russia-jamming-himars-rockets-ukraine/index.html
But some of the claims seem less strong:
https://kyivindependent.com/a-very-bloody-war-what-is-the-death-toll-of-russias-war-in-ukraine/
Mixed on some of the others:
https://theintercept.com/2024/06/22/ukraine-azov-battalion-us-training-ban/
The podcast was a useful reminder, at least, to retain a humility about my beliefs, and that news media is especially suspect in our present moment.
It’s not like I have any power to influence the outcome, but I do still buy into the myth that a responsible citizen retains some degree of information about events around them. My query to tildes is, what’s your narrative about the war, and what sources of information are you drawing upon?
*I’m vaguely aware that there’s somce controversy around these guys. I find the podcast entertaining, however, and they seem to share some of my values about how a sane society would function, and, like this report, they sometimes really challenge my understanding of what I think is going on.
26 votes -
Five failures in the Oval Office
14 votes -
Volodymyr Zelenskyy Fox News interview after Oval Office meeting
27 votes