-
46 votes
-
US President Donald Trump order challenges independence of Federal Communications Commission, Federal Trade Commission and financial regulators
20 votes -
The legal blueprint for radical federalism - to protect state autonomy in the US
9 votes -
A quarter of US shoppers have dumped favorite stores over political stances
22 votes -
How can one determine "true" sentiment?
In an age of increasing misinformation and division, I've found that it's increasingly easy to find yourself in an echo chamber of opinions (of people and/or bots). And when I go searching outside...
In an age of increasing misinformation and division, I've found that it's increasingly easy to find yourself in an echo chamber of opinions (of people and/or bots). And when I go searching outside that echo chamber, I usually don't find well reasoned discussion, but a different echo chamber with the opposite opinion.
This is especially true on sites like Reddit and Twitter, but also applies to pretty much every website (including Tildes) to some extent. Even newspapers aren't helpful as they are all largely owned by a handful of billionaires with an agenda. And real life isn't much better. My friends and family all share similar values and ideals, which is great for getting along, but it doesn't help me figure out how many people actually support something in particular.
The closest thing I've found to objective polling are elections. Unfortunately, they largely group everything into one of two buckets and don't have room for nuance on individual topics. Also, a lot of people don't even vote, which doesn't necessarily muddy the data, but it does leave out the opinions of a lot of people.
Is it even possible to determine this without an individual referendum on each topic? Am I worrying too much about something unknowable?
Some example issues
(copy/pasted from my reply to chocobean)
-
Belief in annexation of Canada as the 51st state. Most people (that I've seen) are not in favour of this, but some people are super gung-ho about this. Is this bot-led behaviour, or is there really such a large number of people that want to invade Canada? And how many Canadians want to become a state? Is it any, or are they all bots? How can I tell if it's 10%, 1%, or 0.1% of the population that actually wants this? A gut feeling from everything I've seen online tells me that more Americans want this than Canadians, but that doesn't really mean much without an anchor point.
-
Similarly, trampling individual rights (especially when it comes to LGBTQ+ policies). The current US administration is doing everything they can to destroy this. I've seen similar sentiment in Canada, but I don't know how much this is supported by either population. Does everyone who didn't vote or who voted Republican hate queer people? Hopefully not. But there's no way to separate (in the data) a Republican full of hatred from a Republican who thought that Trump would fix the economy and prioritized that above all else. So how many people hate "the gays"? How many people say they don't hate gay people, but also don't care if they're collateral damage in a fight against "transgender indoctrination"? Maybe nuance like that doesn't actually matter, but assuming it does, the nuance disappears in any online discussion and can't be properly observed.
-
Sentiment about [country]'s position in Palestine/Israel. Everything I've seen leads me to believe that almost every politician supports Israel, and almost every non-politician supports Palestine. Obviously there's a lot more nuance to "support" than I'm giving here, but it's hard to actually believe that the divide is so stark and well-defined.
13 votes -
-
Timothy Snyder: Appeasement at Munich
7 votes -
Analysis of US President Donald Trump's executive orders focusing on impact to countries in the Global South
11 votes -
The path to American authoritarianism - what comes after democratic breakdown
33 votes -
Remarks by Singapore minister for defence Dr Ng Eng Hen at the BMW Foundation Leaders Roundtable, “On the horns of a trilemma: Geopolitical recession, technological leadership and energy security"
6 votes -
What insights do you have as to why and how the US right is accepting blatant corruption and why the government cuts are so extreme and unrelated to stated goals?
This question was inspired by a question from a US immigrant citizen who came from a country that had been under Soviet political hegemony. They said that in their experience authoritarianism and...
This question was inspired by a question from a US immigrant citizen who came from a country that had been under Soviet political hegemony. They said that in their experience authoritarianism and corruption were kept camoflauged for fear of political backlash, but our new US government is shameless.
I'll put my tentative answer in the comments. I'm very interested to hear your thoughts if you care to share.
35 votes -
H.R.1161 - To authorize the US President to enter into negotiations to acquire Greenland and to rename Greenland as "Red, White, and Blueland".
34 votes -
You have 1.000.000 EUR to spend on protecting European democracy. What do you spend it on?
I would like to hear your opinions. 1MM eur is not a lot; how do you spend it most efficiently? Do you use it as a lever to raise more money? Do you tackle grassroots efforts? This is a “how do we...
I would like to hear your opinions. 1MM eur is not a lot; how do you spend it most efficiently? Do you use it as a lever to raise more money? Do you tackle grassroots efforts?
This is a “how do we fight back” question.
My requirement is that the suggestions are practical and relevant for today’s world, not an idealised version of it. But nothing is off limits, be creative.
If you have suggestions for different amounts I’ll also hear them.
24 votes -
Donald Trump government pulls hundreds of videos from US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's YouTube channel
22 votes -
We found the $2 trillion in US government spending cuts that Department of Government Efficiency seeks
25 votes -
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement struggles to boost arrest numbers despite infusion of resources
22 votes -
US farmers feel painful impact of new policies
39 votes -
The feckless opposition
22 votes -
What is the purpose of government?
Succinctly as possible, what is the purpose of government? And with genuine effort to avoid condescension or disparagement, what do you think someone politically opposite to you would say if they...
Succinctly as possible, what is the purpose of government? And with genuine effort to avoid condescension or disparagement, what do you think someone politically opposite to you would say if they were to thoughtfully articulate an answer to the same question?
12 votes -
Attorneys are resigning in response to orders from US President Donald Trump's government
US attorney - Danielle Sassoon US attorney - Hagen Scotten
42 votes -
Only about 40% of the Ted Cruz "woke science" US database is woke science
18 votes -
Interview - how Elon Musk blurs the lines of US free speech and raises tough first amendment questions
11 votes -
Top US election security watchdog forced to stop election security work
21 votes -
Over 60,000 foreigners could lose their right to remain in France due to new language requirements
12 votes -
Thousands of US probationary employees fired as Donald Trump administration directs agencies to carry out widespread layoffs
23 votes -
Denmark's policy of dispersing residents from neighbourhoods with large ethnic minorities is discriminatory, an adviser to the European Union's top court said
7 votes -
Arizona attorney general Kris Mayes: This is a coup
43 votes -
White nationalist forces consolidate power alongside Elon Musk’s junta - a second update on Elon Musk's coup from our intrepid imaginary foreign correspondent
27 votes -
The age of the coward is here, where America’s most powerful corporations, once eager to preach their values, now fold like cheap umbrellas at the first gust of political wind
30 votes -
Non-Americans: How's it going?
Obvious bit of a shitshow over here. Seems to be drowning out the typical international news I see with even "international" news stories being about how the US is doing something stupid in...
Obvious bit of a shitshow over here. Seems to be drowning out the typical international news I see with even "international" news stories being about how the US is doing something stupid in reference to another country.
37 votes -
Denmark least corrupt country, according to Corruption Perceptions Index, closely followed by Finland – New Zealand is replaced by Singapore to make up the top three least corrupt for 2024
17 votes -
Fourteen states sue Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump, calling billionaire’s role unconstitutional
30 votes -
When US Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids go awry, reporting gets blamed
10 votes -
Danish petition to buy California attracts hundreds of thousands of signatures
10 votes -
US President Donald Trump hiring cuts create chaos as Yosemite National Park tries to prepare for crowded spring and summer seasons
17 votes -
Is this a coup?
42 votes -
US Transportation Security Administration workers who are trans forbidden from performing pat down searches
25 votes -
Immigration and Customs Enforcement came for this Texas town's workforce. It was never the same.
13 votes -
Norwegian de-mining operation cuts 1700 worldwide staff after US President Donald Trump funding decision
10 votes -
Top Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials reassigned amid strain to meet US President Donald Trump deportation goals
9 votes -
Judge orders Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Food and Drug Administration to restore websites taken down after US President Donald Trump gender order
21 votes -
When it comes to Canadian politics, all bets are now off
21 votes -
Seoul to offer one million won marriage grant to newlyweds amid population concerns
13 votes -
America's coming Weimar moment (2022)
5 votes -
The crisis of ethics in the United States
I'm increasingly bothered in the last few years in the crisis of ethics in the United States government. It isn't very important to the leaders, and it isn't very important to the voters. I don't...
I'm increasingly bothered in the last few years in the crisis of ethics in the United States government. It isn't very important to the leaders, and it isn't very important to the voters. I don't think it is a "conservative vs liberal" issue. It isn't about religion. It is about basic morality and doing what is best for a functioning society.
I think about ethics more about once a year when my job has everyone take a small course on ethics. There is a lot of basic and obvious stuff in the course, but a big part of it is that even the appearance of conflicts of interest should be avoided. And I'm sure if this is important for the general workforce, it should be even more important for public figures.
I'm well aware that the government has done unethical things in the past, and some of them were horrific. But I don't remember a time when unethical behavior has been flaunted so openly. The president is fundamentally unethical. He constantly lies and takes open bribes and enriches himself at the expense of the proper functioning of the government. The supreme court is fundamentally unethical and barely tries to conceal taking bribes. The president's political party openly ignores their duty to hold the president accountable for crimes, and participates in them, including sedition. The top leaders of businesses and the press have been obviously captured by money and corruption.
For years we were concerned about "dark money" and who was funding the propaganda and disinformation. Well now we have the richest person in the world openly buying an election and taking over fundamental functions of the government.
This crisis of political ethics is a direct result of a crisis of ethics in all parts of society. I think it flows back and forth like a disease. The voters do not hold the leaders accountable because the voters themselves are not ethical. I don't think supporters of Trump are completely the victims of propaganda. I think they made an unethical choice for selfish reasons. Part of ethics is taking responsibility for making sure you have the correct information when you make a choice. I'm not sure that most are capable of learning that the price of eggs is worth the collapse of being able to trust each other and make progress as a society.
By the way, I think a lot of us are hoping that this open feeding frenzy of greed and dishonesty is part of a pendulum that swings back and forth. But I'm reminded that in 1977 Jimmy Carter was elected to help restore ethics to the presidency. He only served one term as president and was replaced by a highly unethical person who was supported by highly unethical people who created a right-wing propaganda network of talk radio and Fox News.
31 votes -
Finland has been held up as an international example to follow in tackling homelessness but the Nordic country has just reported its first rising numbers in eleven years
8 votes -
Inside the new plan to seize Russia’s shadow fleet
12 votes -
Denmark grants asylum to 'historically' low number – 309 were from Syria, 130 were from Eritrea and another 130 were from Afghanistan
7 votes -
Trade wars and how nations fight them - tariffs, subsidies and the risks of trade warfare
6 votes -
Weekly US politics news and updates thread - week of February 3
This thread is posted weekly - please try to post all relevant US political content in here, such as news, updates, opinion articles, etc. Extremely significant events may warrant a separate...
This thread is posted weekly - please try to post all relevant US political content in here, such as news, updates, opinion articles, etc. Extremely significant events may warrant a separate topic, but almost all should be posted in here.
This is an inherently political thread; please try to avoid antagonistic arguments and bickering matches. Comment threads that devolve into unproductive arguments may be removed so that the overall topic is able to continue.
15 votes -
US National Institutes of Health cuts billions of dollars in biomedical funding, effective immediately
44 votes