-
17 votes
-
Copyright abuse is getting Luigi Mangione merch removed from the internet – artists, merch sellers, and journalists making and posting Luigi media have become the targets of bogus DMCA claims
65 votes -
Kagi Small Web
39 votes -
Tips for increasing online privacy (without going insane)?
I've been researching internet privacy and fell down the rabbit hole of...well, internet privacy. I started with deleting Facebook/Instagram and switching to fire fox + plugins. I would like to...
I've been researching internet privacy and fell down the rabbit hole of...well, internet privacy. I started with deleting Facebook/Instagram and switching to fire fox + plugins. I would like to make more improvements but I really have no idea how, it started with deleting socials and next thing you know I'm looking at LineageOS and de-googling.
If anyone has any suggestions on where to go next while staying realistic/not going crazy, i would love to hear them. I am not really sure where to set my expectations, basically I would like to have more control of my data. The other day Google photos gave me a memory recap which kind of creeped me out! I am suddenly not fond of whatever is going on under the surface of Google photos that's making collages and trying to sell my photo books. Also g-board giving me a pop up in the text prediction row asking me to rate the app??? Ew.
I am a fan of self hosting and run a small NAS (open media vault) but this too quickly turns into the privacy spiral and leaves me thinking I should throw my phone into a river and live in the forest. Would love to hear your thoughts/advice/opinions!
54 votes -
You should have a website
37 votes -
blogroll.club - A blog directory
15 votes -
Mozilla begs courts to allow Google search deal for Firefox to continue
59 votes -
Supreme Court wants US input on whether ISPs should be liable for users’ piracy, in $1 billion Sony v. Cox case
38 votes -
United States Department of Justice will push Google to sell Chrome to break search monopoly
79 votes -
Google stops letting sites like Forbes rule search for “Best CBD Gummies“
21 votes -
Google is testing the ‘impact’ of removing EU news from search results
21 votes -
Img_0416
35 votes -
The Browser Company announces Arc Browser will no longer be their flagship product
31 votes -
Don't contribute anything relevant in web forums like Reddit
30 votes -
Kagi Translate
24 votes -
We can have a different web
41 votes -
Very unusual behaviour trying to use Duck Duck Go. Any suggestions for what to do?
Solution I added 20.43.161.105 duckduckgo.com to my hosts file and everything is working fine now. I also changed DNS servers away from my ISPs, thanks to all the recommendations in this thread....
Solution
I added 20.43.161.105 duckduckgo.com to my hosts file and everything is working fine now.
I also changed DNS servers away from my ISPs, thanks to all the recommendations in this thread.cat /etc/resolve.conf nameserver 1.1.1.1 nameserver 1.0.0.1
That seems to be working
> nslookup duckduckgo.com Server: 1.1.1.1 Address: 1.1.1.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: duckduckgo.com Address: 202.39.62.156 Name: duckduckgo.com Address: 2001:b000:1a0:3505:202:39:62:15d
except (note that non-autoratative IP address which belongs to my ISP) ...
> ping -4 duckduckgo.com PING duckduckgo.com (202.39.62.156) 56(84) bytes of data.
My ISPs address again. More...
traceroute to duckduckgo.com (202.39.62.156), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 * * * 2 * * * 3 * * * ... 30 * * * *
Why do ping and traceroute not use the new DNS server's I've configured (after re-booting too_)
The only thing to work is to add20.43.161.105 duckduckgo.com
to my hosts file and now everything seems to be working as expected, though I have doubts now that changing the DNS configuration has done any good.
I know ISPs cache things like youtube to reduce costs so I'm wondering if 202.39.62.156 handled caching of duckduckgo, and they pointed their nameservers there and that box is broken.
Thanks for everyone's input and patience (lol are you still reading???)
Original Question
I've used Duck Duck Go as my main search engine for many, many years.
I have several search engines installed in Firefox including 2 for duck duck go. One for the /lite version and one for the full version.[See update at bottom]
In recent days neither of these work. I would type my query into the search engine, press enter as I have done for years.
All I see is a blank page.
The latest development is that when I try and enter ANY search to either of those engines I get a GOOGLE 404 not found page.
traceroute duckduckgo.com ─╯ traceroute to duckduckgo.com (216.239.38.120), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 * * * 2 * * * 3 The usual internal routing of my ISP 4 "" "" "" 5 "" "" "" 6 "" "" "" 7 "" "" "" 8 * * * 9 any-in-2678.1e100.net (216.239.38.120) 4.089 ms 4.077 ms 4.181 ms ping duckduckgo.com ─╯ PING duckduckgo.com (2001:4860:4802:32::78) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from any-in-2001-4860-4802-32--78.1e100.net (2001:4860:4802:32::78): icmp_seq=1 ttl=117 time=10.1 ms 64 bytes from any-in-2001-4860-4802-32--78.1e100.net (2001:4860:4802:32::78): icmp_seq=2 ttl=117 time=8.52 ms 64 bytes from any-in-2001-4860-4802-32--78.1e100.net (2001:4860:4802:32::78): icmp_seq=3 ttl=117 time=6.87 ms 64 bytes from any-in-2001-4860-4802-32--78.1e100.net (2001:4860:4802:32::78): icmp_seq=4 ttl=117 time=8.83 ms --- duckduckgo.com ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3005ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 6.873/8.584/10.118/1.155 ms cat /etc/resolv.conf > MY ISPs name servers > MY ISPs name servers
Sure enough I cannot find any pages on the site 2001-4860-4802-32--78.1e100.net which is obviously belongs to google.
This is very very strange.
Could someone verify if they can use DDG or whether they see the same as me?
Does anyone have any idea what's happening?
UPDATE
I can connect to and use DuckDuckGo using a browser VPN. This appears to be a mess made by my ISP.
I'd still like suggestion to overcome the problem though.14 votes -
‘We were wrong’: An oral history of WIRED’s original website
14 votes -
Wikipedia article blocked worldwide by Delhi high court
78 votes -
Google, Microsoft, and Perplexity promote debunked scientific racism in AI search results
22 votes -
Big changes are coming to ArchiveBox!
10 votes -
The editors protecting Wikipedia from AI hoaxes
18 votes -
HTML for people
55 votes -
Forums are still alive, active, and a treasure trove of information
78 votes -
The disappearance of an internet domain
49 votes -
Is the .io top level domain headed for extinction?
14 votes -
Starlink is offering free internet access for thirty days for folks affected by Hurricane Helene
22 votes -
Vox Media, on the hunt for new revenue streams, is exploring putting up a pay wall on The Verge
29 votes -
OFTC IRC network loses 20,000 users overnight
11 votes -
Does anyone have experience with tools for locally archiving the web, like Archivebox for example?
I found myself on the Archivebox website earlier today. After reading some of it, that's the kind of program I could use. The ephemerous nature of the web is bothersome, so much content is lost...
I found myself on the Archivebox website earlier today. After reading some of it, that's the kind of program I could use. The ephemerous nature of the web is bothersome, so much content is lost for one reason or another. Archivebox seems to be one of the most popular tools, and it can automatically mirror my locally downloaded website to archive.org, which is great. It seems complex though, maybe more complex than I usually tolerate these days. Which is why I am asking if anyone has personal experience with Archivebox or other similar programs. Do you find them useful and reliable? Have you ever found in your local storage a webpage that you really liked, which was gone from the web? How's your setup?
Thank ;)
19 votes -
The Net is a forest. It has fires. (2013)
14 votes -
Google will now link to The Internet Archive to add more context to Search results
37 votes -
Google loses €2.4bn EU antitrust case for favouring its own shopping service
33 votes -
What the death of Cohost tells me about my future on the internet
Cohost.org, an independent social media blogging platform, will be shutting down as early as next month. A lot of users are talking about how their time on Cohost changed the way they think about...
Cohost.org, an independent social media blogging platform, will be shutting down as early as next month. A lot of users are talking about how their time on Cohost changed the way they think about what an experience in an online community can be like in the modern age of the internet. People saying that they'd rather move forward with spending more time offline and with their hobbies than chasing the next social media site after Cohost's closure. I tend to agree.
After checking an old forum recently that I used to frequent in the heyday of internet forums, I found it filled with racist fear-mongering that is left unmoderated after the driving force of the community passed away half a decade ago. I wonder how much of the spirit of the old web we can realistically rekindle. If you're on Tildes, you probably know everything about the faults of giant social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit. Heck, the poor quality the YouTube comments section was a meme when YouTube was new. It was never good on those sites. Just tolerable and everybody was there so you kind of had no choice. Now, many of those platforms are self-imploding.
Cohost, like Tildes, created an atmosphere where you didn't feel like you were committing a moral wrongdoing by not immediately spewing scalding hot takes about current events, drama and conflicts. You were encouraged to write text that wasn't throwaway garbage. You could have meaningful conversations about issues and find an audience. Cohost was not without its flaws. People of colour in particular recently shared experiences of racist harassment on the site that was purely handled by moderation. But overall the takes I'm reading now is that most people will be able to look back on their time on Cohost fondly. I've seen people calling it "the Dreamcast of websites".
Cohost was a social media site that was a joy to visit for me and didn't put me on an edge by interacting with it. I could write posts, long-form posts without pressure to hit out another one-line zinger while a topic "is still relevant". I didn't see endless chains of subtweets that deliberately avoided explicitly mentioning the drama they were commenting on, lest the hate mob find their comment. I didn't get into that kind of unnerving cycle of "I don't know what this post is about, but the infrastructure of this social network suggests it's a moral failure to not chime in on the topic de jour, so I better get going and scan vile tweets for an hour to find out what's going on".
And before you say that this is only a Twitter problem, I have had pretty much exactly the same experiences on Mastodon and especially Bluesky. I feel the same in over-crowded Discord servers where it's very difficult to keep track of what's been talked about and what the current topic of discussion is. I feel the same on the few active forums that still exist, like resetera, where there's just posts upon posts that you're kind of expected to read before you chime in into a thread.
So where to go from here? I'm thinking about setting up my own proper blog, maybe hosted on an own website. That way I can continue to create long form posts about topics I want to. And bring back a little more of the spirit of the old internet. Cohost is dead, but there's no going back to me to doomscrolling. Today I set my phone to aggressively limit my daily usage of Reddit & Mastodon. I said the following when Twitter crashed and burned, but this time I'm not desperate, but genuine when I say: It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine.
30 votes -
The Internet Archive lost their latest appeal. Here’s what that means for you.
27 votes -
Russian dark web marketplace admins indicted after arrest in Miami
8 votes -
End of the road: An AnandTech farewell
53 votes -
Dawn of a new era in Search: Balancing innovation, competition, and public good
23 votes -
IKEA is trialling its own second-hand online marketplace so that customers can sell to each other, rather than relying on buy-and-sell websites like eBay or Gumtree
42 votes -
Chinese government hackers penetrate US internet providers to spy
17 votes -
“Disenshittify or die” a rant about the history of tech, how it is bad and how it might get better
122 votes -
Google must destroy $5 billion worth of user data illegally collected in Incognito Mode
55 votes -
US Federal Trade Commission bans fake online reviews, inflated social media influence; rule takes effect in October
52 votes -
Sustainability of FOSS: The Next Generation Internet ecosystem
14 votes -
Syntax highlighting in hand-coded websites
19 votes -
Susan Wojcicki, former YouTube CEO, dies at 56
15 votes -
Been considering cutting down on YouTube
I find myself scrolling through YT hoping to see something to play in the background, occasionally checking things like TechLinked or MichaelMJD with occasional PointCrow and Dougdoug. But really...
I find myself scrolling through YT hoping to see something to play in the background, occasionally checking things like TechLinked or MichaelMJD with occasional PointCrow and Dougdoug. But really just wasting time doing nothing, just scrolling.
So I want to cut it off but I want to fill in that time with something else.
Anyone else has tried to cut off YT(Or at least minimize) YT from their life? I’m probably using YT the wrong way.
I would like some RSS feeds or podcast to make me go on YT less. Or thoughts/opinions/experiences from other people that used to have YT on almost all the time but minimized the time on YT.31 votes -
Public Work: a search engine for public domain images
29 votes -
Google and Meta struck secret ads deal to target teenagers
61 votes -
Some subreddits could be paywalled, hints Reddit CEO
64 votes