22 votes

Does anyone else find CBS News particularly stressful?

I may be in the minority on Tildes who still watches cable news. My mom is the one who puts it on and I'll usually ignore/forget about it when I'm home alone, but I find it's a good way to keep track of major headlines. Also, our usual choice of national news, ABC with David Muir, tends to end every broadcast with some feel-good story which is just... really appreciated in these times. (Though tonight they played a soundbite of Martin Luther King Jr.'s final Sunday sermon, and the choice of that particular soundbite feels very pointed.)

A couple months ago YoutubeTV and Disney got into a contract disagreement though, so ABC was removed from the lineup for a bit. For a while we watched CBS News, and... Something about it just genuinely stressed me out. Of course the news is very stressful lately, but usually I can deal with it. At worst, I leave the room for certain stories that make me particularly angry.

Something about CBS just left me really agitated and stressed though. I can't say what it was exactly, maybe the delivery, or a heavy focus on the worst parts of US politics? All I know is every night I was getting increasingly worked up, the way I only ever did with the most absolutely infuriating news stories, until we switched to NBC until ABC returned to air.

This came to mind again after my mom put on CBS last night since ABC was starting late due to some sports program. It agitated me until I just snapped.

So my question: does anyone else find CBS particularly stressful compared to other cable news? If so, does anyone have any ideas on why that is? And are there any regular watchers who've noticed a shift in tone? I never really watched CBS before, but I'm wondering if maybe it's somehow tied to Bari Weiss's influence given the stuff with 60 Minutes.

9 comments

  1. [6]
    Akir
    Link
    CBS news is garbage now. The parent company got bought by the Ellison family, of Oracle fame, and their move with the news branch was to install Bari Weiss as editor in chief, a right wing nutjob...
    • Exemplary

    CBS news is garbage now. The parent company got bought by the Ellison family, of Oracle fame, and their move with the news branch was to install Bari Weiss as editor in chief, a right wing nutjob who happens to do a better job of sanewashing than most. You are probably better off getting news off of Instagram these days.

    57 votes
    1. psi
      Link Parent
      A particularly timely article: "Inside Bari Weiss’s Hostile Takeover of CBS News." The New Yorker. Probably the most egregious example of her tenure so far

      A particularly timely article:

      Probably the most egregious example of her tenure so far

      A few days before Christmas, “60 Minutes” was set to air a report on CECOT, the prison in El Salvador where the Trump Administration had sent more than two hundred deportees in March. The men, most of whom were from Venezuela, had been spirited out of the U.S. on a series of late-night flights, in violation of a federal judge’s court order. Sharyn Alfonsi, a “60 Minutes” correspondent, had interviewed two of them. The stories were harrowing. “There was blood everywhere, screams, people crying, people who couldn’t take it and were urinating and vomiting on themselves,” one of the men told her. She had reached out to the Trump Administration for comment but received only a cursory, two-sentence response.

      Like all “60 Minutes” stories, the CECOT segment had been fact-checked and vetted by the network’s legal department. Five separate screenings were held for various editorial stakeholders. Weiss was supposed to attend the final screening, on Thursday afternoon, but she had missed it. She didn’t see the segment until late that night, e-mailing suggestions for a few changes that were incorporated into the piece. The network promoted the segment as the lead story for that Sunday’s episode. Alfonsi flew home to Texas.

      The CECOT story was being finalized almost exactly as Ellison was pursuing another major expansion of his growing media empire. Earlier that month, he had launched a hostile takeover bid to purchase Warner Bros. Discovery, the film-and-television conglomerate that had already announced a deal to be acquired by Netflix. In many ways, the outcome depended on Trump, since regulatory approval would be required for either sale to go through. “I’ll be involved in that decision,” Trump had told reporters.

      For Ellison, this was suddenly a problem. “60 Minutes” had recently aired an interview with Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump ally who had fallen out with the President over his resistance to releasing the F.B.I.’s files on the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. “THEY ARE NO BETTER THAN THE OLD OWNERSHIP,” Trump posted on Truth Social after the interview aired. “Since they bought it, 60 minutes has actually gotten WORSE.”

      On Saturday morning, Weiss, who reports directly to Ellison, told “60 Minutes” producers she was concerned that no officials from the Trump Administration had been interviewed on camera for the piece. Specifically, she wanted to include the Administration’s argument for its use of the Alien Enemies Act, an eighteenth-century law that Trump officials claimed allowed them to deport Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador without due process. “We should explain this, with a voice arguing that Trump is exceeding his authority under the relevant statute, and another arguing that he’s operating within the bounds of his authority,” Weiss wrote in a note to the producers. “There’s a genuine debate here.” She had “tracked down” numbers for Tom Homan, the border czar, and Stephen Miller, Trump’s chief immigration adviser, which she sent to the “60 Minutes” team.

      On Sunday, three hours before broadcast, the CECOT piece was officially pulled from the lineup. “My job is to make sure that all stories we publish are the best they can be,” Weiss said in a statement. “Holding stories that aren’t ready for whatever reason—that they lack sufficient context, say, or that they are missing critical voices—happens every day in every newsroom.” Alfonsi felt betrayed. “In my view, pulling it now, after every rigorous internal check has been met, is not an editorial decision, it is a political one,” she wrote in a note to her colleagues. “Government silence is a statement, not a VETO. Their refusal to be interviewed is a tactical maneuver designed to kill the story.”

      The next day, the Ellisons announced a significant sweetening of their bid for Warner Bros.: Larry would personally guarantee $40.4 billion of the funding. Weiss didn’t come to the CBS offices that day. She joined the morning’s daily editorial meeting via Zoom, beginning with what seemed like a rebuke of Alfonsi. “The only newsroom that I’m interested in running is one where we are able to have contentious disagreements about the thorniest editorial matters and do so with respect, and, crucially, where we assume the best intent of our colleagues,” Weiss said. “And anything else is absolutely unacceptable to me and should be unacceptable to you.”

      That afternoon, during a “60 Minutes” staff meeting, Scott Pelley, a longtime correspondent, expressed frustration that Weiss hadn’t attended any of the screenings of the segment or communicated directly with Alfonsi. “She needs to take her job a little bit more seriously,” he said. A former CBS staffer was soon circulating an open letter to Ellison, expressing alarm at “a breakdown in editorial oversight” that risked “setting a dangerous precedent in a country that has traditionally valued press freedom.” A former CBS executive told me that, even if Weiss’s concerns had been valid, her decision to cut the segment at such a late hour had opened her up to charges of corporate interference: “It makes you wonder, Did someone call once they saw the promo on the air and then she spent more time on it because there was some big complaint?” Sources close to Weiss and Ellison said that Skydance leadership had zero involvement in the story and did not screen the piece.

      10 votes
    2. [3]
      DynamoSunshirt
      Link Parent
      Good to know that I should expect no better from CBS than I expect from Fox these days. I wonder if that purchase explains why more of my previously liberal-leaning CBS-watching relatives have...

      Good to know that I should expect no better from CBS than I expect from Fox these days. I wonder if that purchase explains why more of my previously liberal-leaning CBS-watching relatives have veered far right in the last few years? I previously assumed it was just a part of getting old (I know how ageist that sounds, but surely as dementia and brain cobwebs creep in you become an easier target for brainwashing?), but now I wonder if it's something more insidious.

      8 votes
      1. Akir
        Link Parent
        The Weiss thing is a fairly new development. But that being said, I have noticed that traditional news outlets generally have been leaning farther and farther right in more recent years,...

        The Weiss thing is a fairly new development. But that being said, I have noticed that traditional news outlets generally have been leaning farther and farther right in more recent years, presumably in the attempt to appear to be "balanced".

        6 votes
      2. CannibalisticApple
        Link Parent
        That's part of why I made this topic. As I said in another comment, I worry it may impact the mindsets of longtime viewers. I only watched it for a couple weeks, and was thus able to notice my...

        That's part of why I made this topic. As I said in another comment, I worry it may impact the mindsets of longtime viewers. I only watched it for a couple weeks, and was thus able to notice my stress levels jumping compared to the other news stations, so I could safely conclude there was something up with CBS specifically rather than just "everything is awful".

        For someone who only ever watched CBS though? If there was a gradual shift in tone, they probably wouldn't notice. I don't think it blatantly pushed any agenda that I recall (at least not as blatantly as Fox), but just experiencing the sort of tension and stress I felt long-term would absolutely screw with people's heads. That sort of tension makes it easy to rile people up and look only at the negatives. They'll often look for reasons to get upset, or for something or someone to blame—and the right-wing crowd specializes in targeting those sorts of people.

        Note, this problem unfortunately applies to coverage from both sides. I have a liberal friend with bad anxiety issues who only ever seemed to focus on the worst news towards the end of Trump's first term and 2020. It got to the point that I think they actually lost the ability to believe anything good could happen. At the peak, we had to call them out to stop actively seeking out right-wing Twitter accounts to find new reasons to get upset.

        So even left-leaning news, if it focuses too much on the doom and gloom or otherwise carries an overly negative/critical tone, can lead to pretty bad mental spirals. Which absolutely ties into how screwed up American society is right now... We have people on both sides getting riled up to seek out even more reasons to be angry at the other.

        4 votes
    3. CannibalisticApple
      Link Parent
      No intentions of watching it again. I told my mom last night that I'd rather just not watch the news at all if the other stations aren't available. I'm just curious about what exactly makes it so...

      No intentions of watching it again. I told my mom last night that I'd rather just not watch the news at all if the other stations aren't available.

      I'm just curious about what exactly makes it so much more stressful for me than ABC and NBC, and whether anyone else feels the same. There wasn't anything I could explicitly identity when watching it, and I have no intention of watching it again to analyze it. Just seeing the ticker banner (not even the text, the banner itself) made me feel surprisingly anxious.

      I also wonder if there was a gradual transition in the tone after Bari Weiss took over, or if it was always more... I don't know, negative? Agitating? It's had a steady reputation for a long time, and without getting political, I wonder if it may have worsened the moods of longtime watchers who didn't notice a tone shift towards the worse. It didn't feel as openly incisive as Fox News, but the level of stress and agitation I felt watching it... That would really screw with people's heads over a long period of time, which is the last thing we need right now.

      7 votes
  2. stu2b50
    Link
    Can't say that I have. To refresh myself, I watched a bit of CBS on youtube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ygySTWJ92M), and nothing particularly stood out to me as "stressful".

    Can't say that I have. To refresh myself, I watched a bit of CBS on youtube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ygySTWJ92M), and nothing particularly stood out to me as "stressful".

    3 votes
  3. [2]
    kingofsnake
    Link
    It's no secret that need has become faster, less in-depth and more focused on the stories and perspectives that cater to the algorithms. For reporters, topics that used to be created for TV as a...

    It's no secret that need has become faster, less in-depth and more focused on the stories and perspectives that cater to the algorithms.

    For reporters, topics that used to be created for TV as a destination are now made for social media first and foremost. It's my bet that the feel good stories that used to be peppered throughout nightly news don't play as important a role, and that the flow of the newscast just isn't as playful.

    Or maybe it's the same and we've changed. Lol. Who knows.

    2 votes
    1. CannibalisticApple
      Link Parent
      That, and so much is happening these days that the evening national news typically can't focus on many stories for more than about 30 seconds each. I swear that some of the previews of "upcoming...

      That, and so much is happening these days that the evening national news typically can't focus on many stories for more than about 30 seconds each. I swear that some of the previews of "upcoming stories" before commercial breaks on ABC end up being just as long as the actual segment, particularly when it's focusing on a clip of something like a car crashing through a wall or an explosion. Pretty sure sometimes there's not even a minute between commercial breaks.

      That said, ABC and NBC feel like they keep a fairly neutral if not positive tone—not in terms of political leaning, but delivery. I think ABC makes a point to sprinkle in some more upbeat (or offbeat) stories throughout the broadcast. Even those clips of explosions and car crashes can provide a break from the doom and gloom of bigger stories because it's just wild to see those.

      4 votes